Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

About 3 weeks ago mate of mine and me went to Lithgow with boys for some go kart practice, while there we went to holy land Bathurst as well. Also we droped in motorsport museum and took only few shots from all the exitment absolutely amazing. I couldn't really put my foot down anywhere as people were using the track to jogg?? Even if I could coming down the mauntain is no joke let me tell you! :D

Enjoy

Dave

post-20815-1234434664_thumb.jpg

post-20815-1234434727_thumb.jpg

post-20815-1234434799_thumb.jpg

post-20815-1234434918_thumb.jpg

post-20815-1234434974_thumb.jpg

post-20815-1234435031_thumb.jpg

post-20815-1234435101_thumb.jpg

post-20815-1234435164_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/256803-gtr-returns-to-bathurst/
Share on other sites

I couldn't really put my foot down anywhere as people were using the track to jogg??

did u hapen to notice if there was a white au xr8 or a blue bf xr6 parked near he medical center near the heli pad cause we were walking round the mount and a gun metal r32 gtr drove passed us. mite of being you. Yeah the mount is a good place to walk it gets u fit pretty quick walking and jogging it.

I went to last years bathurst 1000 and walked from reid park around to the bottom on friday night. Unless you been there, you really dont know how steep the track is. Unbelievable.

Pity u didnt do it on saturday nite and i knew u i woulda sung out to u to say gday as i was in the team kiwi shed helpin them put the car back together after helping the tint-a-car team in the fujitsu series all weekend.

even after all these years the v8's still cant figure out how to beat the skyline...

GT-R you mean.............GT-R = Godzilla..... GTS-t + GT-T = NOT godzilla

well how could they....if Porsche cant even figure out how to beat the latest R35?!

and had the biggest dummy spit and made a conspiracy against the GT-R

but to be honest, those new VE maloo utes are shit HELLA QUICK!

and they look really nice too

Pity my gtst nugget beat the ve ute!

Oh and I think David knows the difference !!

Actually, search YouTube for user giant, he has his r33 Gtr in rwd mode at Bathurst carving up porsches, a new r35 and many other cars!!!

evil, where is this user giant bloke, i cant find him on youtube.

edit: i think i found him

Yeah thats the video take not of when they were goin over the humps in mountain and conrod straight how they backed of to keep the car straight.

Pity my gtst nugget beat the ve ute!

Oh and I think David knows the difference !!

Actually, search YouTube for user giant, he has his r33 Gtr in rwd mode at Bathurst carving up porsches, a new r35 and many other cars!!!

Hey Chris,

Is that your car mentioned in march MOTOR under "What's in your garage section"??? I've just noticed that while reading it last night if so that's cool I would keep a copy to show my grandkids one day.

Perhaps you could use that as a sales pitch with prospective buyer? :)

Good luck with sale.

Dave

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...