Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 231
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

This meeting waz a good idea

i would love to know what waz legaly defectable and what waznt..and have the cops know that aswell so their is no grey areas.

hope this all works out well in the end

lol.

1 person of status disagrees, watch everyone jump on board.

ive said it before, ill say it again, stop trying to fight the law, you will lose.

lol that made me think of this:

But honestly, everything has now been said and done, why argue points from 3 weeks ago?

It really doesnt matter how good the relationship is with SAPOL and who knows who.....

The fact is organised car cruises represent a gathering of people with generally illegally modified cars that are getting together to show each other their cars, talk cars, and finally drive their cars. Rarely do people with totally stock Hyundai Accents go to these cruises because they dont give a damn about their cars...

To the Police organised cruises represent a rare opportunity of shooting fish in a barrel by ridding the roads of a potential menace, congestion, and anti-social car behaviour. While this might sound damning I cant remember being on a car cruise in the past 20 years where multiple traffic violations havent occurred. Now be honest with yourselves and who hasnt given it a squirt alongside their mates on a cruise, thats part of the fun, right?

And so is SAPOLs determination to stop these gatherings and the resulting activity. You drive an illegal car, you invite the Police to your cruise, they will defect you. They see roadworthiness as your safety as well as their job, and really they should have explained that you. No amount of brokering deals will ever change this, its all been done many times before, and will be again in the future. The result will always be the same.

Enjoy your modified cars, but be sensible enough not to do it in groups if you dont want to be defected. Go for drives meeting up somewhere out in the country, and then keep it to a minimum. Dont drive through built up areas or the cruise strips attracting unwanted attention. Rather than trying to change the law, its time to change your thinking....or keep playing the defect game. As one old Copper told me in the past "Try as hard as you want mate and put it through stock again, we will just keep pinging you every time we see you....and we ALWAYS win. You will get sick of it before we do".

Know what? He was right :ermm:

i honestly agreez with mr donnon

no im not the most sensible out there, far from it, but im stoppin how i look at things due to recent events, as said before like it or not the cops will win

its like snakes and ladders

u build the car up, and they come along and bring u back down, then u go up again and u fall even harder the second time, hell i never won a game of snakes and ladders and it like that with an import

but for the real hard passionate drivers, not the cruising type of people, but the 80 km/h+ sidewayz people, and i know there is a couple on here

SAVE IT FOR THE TRACK and buy a car dedicated for it

thankyou :)

moral - BUY A TRACK CAR, OR SAVE UR PASSIONATE SKILLS FOR THE TRACK

and i wont use hooning, coz if you know wat ur doing and had practice, ur not a hoon, ur a skilled/passionate driver

R*K are hoons

Its unfair for us to expect the police to believe you've done your mods safely and correctly if you're not qualified for the job. Producing invoicing for work completed or at least 'safety checked' by a pro is the fair and proper way to do things. There are alot of dodgy mods out there and they are unsafe, you know this. You can't ask for special treatment because you "know what you are doing". These have been famous last words. The police would like to see evidence of a qualified professional doing the job. I love working on my own car, but I also love ensuring everything is right and safe. I have no quarrels at all with having most or part of the work completed by a pro. It only commonsense guys. Before you go bombarding Neil with trivial questions, push your pride aside and try using a bit of commonsense first.

innocent til proven guilty, they should have to prove its unsafe, we shouldnt have to prove its safe. unfortunately it doesnt work like this, we have to pay $130 just to prove our own innocence even if we havnt done anything wrong.

the defect system is an absolute disgrace and until its fixed some police will continue to abuse it, i think its great that we are working with a few police officers, but if we think for a second this will make any noticable difference on the streets we are kidding ourselves. maybe as far as SAU cruises are concerned there might be a bit of releif, but the hour or 2 i spend on a cruise once every few weeks is hardly going to make a difference to the many hours a day i spend on the road having to take special "anti-police" routes, having to position myself between cars in my lane to hide my car from police cars going the opposite direction and having to spend every second on the road searching for police cars, just so i can limit my defect count to only a few times a year instead of more.

im sorry, i just dont beleive the problem can really be solved until the defect system is fixed, which i dont see happening any time soon as it is cost efficient and doesnt affect the majority of the public, and nobody gives a shit about the hoons, they deserve to have their cars taken off the road, so why change it?

like i said, any cooperation between us and sapol is a step in the right direction, i just dont think people should be rushing out of their bomb shelters just yet.

It really doesnt matter how good the relationship is with SAPOL and who knows who.....

The fact is organised car cruises represent a gathering of people with generally illegally modified cars that are getting together to show each other their cars, talk cars, and finally drive their cars. Rarely do people with totally stock Hyundai Accents go to these cruises because they dont give a damn about their cars...

To the Police organised cruises represent a rare opportunity of shooting fish in a barrel by ridding the roads of a potential menace, congestion, and anti-social car behaviour. While this might sound damning I cant remember being on a car cruise in the past 20 years where multiple traffic violations havent occurred. Now be honest with yourselves and who hasnt given it a squirt alongside their mates on a cruise, thats part of the fun, right?

And so is SAPOLs determination to stop these gatherings and the resulting activity. You drive an illegal car, you invite the Police to your cruise, they will defect you. They see roadworthiness as your safety as well as their job, and really they should have explained that you. No amount of brokering deals will ever change this, its all been done many times before, and will be again in the future. The result will always be the same.

Enjoy your modified cars, but be sensible enough not to do it in groups if you dont want to be defected. Go for drives meeting up somewhere out in the country, and then keep it to a minimum. Dont drive through built up areas or the cruise strips attracting unwanted attention. Rather than trying to change the law, its time to change your thinking....or keep playing the defect game. As one old Copper told me in the past "Try as hard as you want mate and put it through stock again, we will just keep pinging you every time we see you....and we ALWAYS win. You will get sick of it before we do".

Know what? He was right :)

perfectly put, agree 100%

I disagree.

To the Police organised cruises represent a rare opportunity of shooting fish in a barrel by ridding the roads of a potential menace, congestion, and anti-social car behaviour. While this might sound damning I cant remember being on a car cruise in the past 20 years where multiple traffic violations havent occurred. Now be honest with yourselves and who hasnt given it a squirt alongside their mates on a cruise, thats part of the fun, right?

Then you've obviously been on the wrong cruises. As a matter of fact, I haven't seen you attend any SAU cruises that I've been on in the last 12 months. All the cruises I've attended (and organised) have not once resulted in any defects or traffic violations. We are discussing SAU cruises and the SAU reputation here. Your observation is just that: "your observation".

In any case, the concern is with defects and the fairness of defect, not "multiple traffic violations". Keep on topic please.

Nisskid is right, the defect system needs to be fixed, and Neil has informed us that the wheels are turning to fix that problem.

Already been said by my self. I'll stop repeating, thats it from me. :)

Yep ... I'm tired of repeating myself too. Some people are not listening ... their ears are only open to what they want to hear. So I've said enough and had enough. Its easy to lead sheep when you feed them what they want. Try to make a difference and people get all negative and disbelieving.

If everyone wants to live in a box, thats fine by me. Some of us are trying to make a difference. Others will never believe, and would rather watch FnF over and over again :)

Edited by RubyRS4
If everyone wants to live in a box, thats fine by me. Some of us are trying to make a difference. Others will never believe, and would rather watch FnF over and over again :)

I think you need to take your own advice on some other topics.

I think change is great but it all last awhile and then goes back to the same old system.. A few of us have been around for a long time in the car scence and have seen this all before..

When I see the changes then I will believe!

:)

Other topics? We're talking about the defect problem in SA, not NSW. I don't see many members putting in the work to make a change. And I've been around the car scene long enough too (20 years) thank you. You haven't noticed changes in 20 years? I pity you.

Stay on topic please.

Edited by RubyRS4
Then you've obviously been on the wrong cruises. As a matter of fact, I haven't seen you attend any SAU cruises that I've been on in the last 12 months. All the cruises I've attended (and organised) have not once resulted in any defects or traffic violations. We are discussing SAU cruises and the SAU reputation here. Your observation is just that: "your observation".

In any case, the concern is with defects and the fairness of defect, not "multiple traffic violations". Keep on topic please.

then you either have memory loss problems, or are lying.

ive been on 3-4 SAU organised cruises and every time have seen traffic violations, "prominent" members of the SA SAU giving it a squirt over the speed limit, burnouts from lights, no indication between lanes, short drag races and you realise when you do a "tunnel" run and everyone slaps the exelarator that is noise polution and therefor against the law, and isnt that even a hoon law now?.....

so either open your eyes or dont lie

This thread is never going to go well due to there are people that sit on two sides of the fence.

Even if you do talk to one cop "Neil" it doesnt change the fact that the rest of the police force in SA will start thinking the same..When they pull you over they do so on there own judgement!

All modifications are illegal due to the car didnt come out with them from factory so if you modify you run the risk..

I have learnt like Martin you cant win and the safe way to go is get a daily car and take your hi powered car off the streets - to Drags or Track!

maybe the next step is to start making movements to mod plates? talk to local MP's or senators, there is no logical reason why we shouldnt have these plates in SA, the cops still get there revenue and we get to feel that little bit safer

Nisskid is right, the defect system needs to be fixed, and Neil has informed us that the wheels are turning to fix that problem.

good to hear.

Then you've obviously been on the wrong cruises. As a matter of fact, I haven't seen you attend any SAU cruises that I've been on in the last 12 months. All the cruises I've attended (and organised) have not once resulted in any defects or traffic violations. We are discussing SAU cruises and the SAU reputation here. Your observation is just that: "your observation".

i think what he is saying they occur, not that they get pinched for them.

Thats how screwed the whole thing is....if you cant be truthful to yourselves ie. some if not ALL SAU members will break the speed limit on a cruise (which is why cruises exist in the first place).....then dont ever expect to pull the wool over the cops eyes either. Remember when you were a little kid and heard Fairytales at bedtime? Ever heard of 'Little Red Riding Hood' - "Oh what big teeth you have Constable Neill"

Now put him to the test and show me I am wrong... :wave:

Make sure you have wireless Broadband so you can post from the waiting room at Regency Park......

Edited by Martin Donnon

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks for the reply mate. Well I really hope its a hose then not engine out job
    • But.... the reason I want to run a 60 weight is so at 125C it has the same viscosity as a 40 weight at 100C. That's the whole reason. If the viscosity changes that much to drop oil pressure from 73psi to 36psi then that's another reason I should be running an oil that mimics the 40 weight at 100C. I have datalogs from the dyno with the oil pressure hitting 73psi at full throttle/high RPM. At the dyno the oil temp was around 100-105C. The pump has a 70psi internal relief spring. It will never go/can't go above 70psi. The GM recommendation of 6psi per 1000rpm is well under that... The oil sensor for logging in LS's is at the valley plate at the back of  the block/rear of where the heads are near the firewall. It's also where the knock sensors are which are notable for 'false knock'. I'm hoping I just didn't have enough oil up top causing some chatter instead of rods being sad (big hopium/copium I know) LS's definitely heat up the oil more than RB's do, the stock vettes for example will hit 300F(150C) in a lap or two and happily track for years and years. This is the same oil cooler that I had when I was in RB land, being the Setrab 25 row oil cooler HEL thing. I did think about putting a fan in there to pull air out more, though I don't know if that will actually help in huge load situations with lots of speed. I think when I had the auto cooler. The leak is where the block runs to the oil cooler lines, the OEM/Dash oil pressure sender is connected at that junction and is what broke. I'm actually quite curious to see how much oil in total capacity is actually left in the engine. As it currently stands I'm waiting on that bush to adapt the sender to it. The sump is still full (?) of oil and the lines and accusump have been drained, but the filter and block are off. I suspect there's maybe less than 1/2 the total capacity there should be in there. I have noticed in the past that topping up oil has improved oil pressure, as reported by the dash sensor. This is all extremely sketchy hence wanting to get it sorted out lol.
    • I neglected to respond to this previously. Get it up to 100 psi, and then you'll be OK.
    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
×
×
  • Create New...