Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've been driving a few GTR's in my test driving experience, and have been driving a turbo car for a few years now..

And what's the deal with BOV's?

It seems like every guy out there with something to prove has one. The only instance I agree with a BOV is if you drive a very unsual turbo car like a mazda familia or something similar, where the BOV tells people 'Hey I have turbo on this peice of crap'.

Every skyline I have driven fitted with a BOV has been lame.

Every silvia that drives past me with a BOV has been lame, and I have promptly eaten them with my bovless car.

I think it's a gimick that was only cool back when imports where an unusual site on the road, and the bov noise has absolutely no mechanical merit whatsoever.

Your thoughts?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/26124-bovs-cool-or-not-cool/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Well, I think there needs to be clarification here.

Most turbo cars already have a factory BOV.

e.g. My WRX and my R33 GTST.

I think you are refering to after market BOV's that vent to atmosphere instead of being redirected in to the system.

And for the record, I do agree that those BOV's that vent to atmosphere are pretty much "wank bits".

Poll: Should people be able to post lame polls?

All your 'test driving experience' and you dont know what a BOV does?

I think perhaps you should find out what a bov does, and the fact that it is necessary, and the fact that factory ones fail, and the fact that an adjustable aftermarket one is necessary when you run BIG boost, and the fact that a good aftermarket part will perform better than a stock one, and the fact that even with a stock bov when you put a pod on a car you can hear it quite loudly.

And, who gives a rats arse if anybody thinks they are wank - do you buy a set of wheels for a car because other people think you should buy them.

If you do a mod to a car, do it because you want to, not because someone else tells you that you should - or should not.

I have a trust type R bov, plumbed back (to avoid defects). The plumbing is stainless pipe, the pod is enclosed in an aluminium box - and you can still hear it.

Do yourself a favour. Drive a car with a stock bov and light mods (exhaust, cooler, boost, pod, ecu) - then drive the same car with a properly adjusted aftermarket bov THEN tell me you dont know whether or not they should be fitted. Even with exhuast and pod a decent, properly adjusted bov will make an appreciable difference to lag between gear changes.

:) to steve..

I think aftermarket BOV are pointless to most mildly tuned cars out there. If i was running a proper turbo I guess i'd do one, you can feel the difference between gears like Steve is saying above. 90% of BOV's are just installed for "cool" factor however if you ask me.

To be honest.. I'll admit they are kinda cool, as long as they're not some dick just sitting there PSHT'ing off just to show "oh look i've got a turbo". Hearing a heavily worked car scream on boost with a nice BOV is a pretty nice sound though i reckon. It feels good too.

Member of BOVA - "Blowoff Valves Anonymous" :D

but how mad does it sound wen u rev ur car up and then u hear this "PSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT" sound and then everyone just turns around and looks and ur like, thats right u mofo's, stick that up ur ass! cmon, dont deny it, u love it.

and how shit does it sound wen ur cruisin down the rocks and u got ur system pumpin but all the street can hear is the rattling of ur boot and number plate!

It totally depends on the function vs noise factor. The majority of BOVs I hear hit top volume when the sik one behind the wheel revs it to 2000RPM and shifts up - basically having a BOV for the sake of having a BOV. Hence I voted for "lame", because the poll's wording as such is whether or not they are "cool". However, a subtle atmo BOV which vents air without making a racket when you're up it, or a plumb-back BOV, will have a performance gain if the rest of the car is modified.

At the moment I'm not sure if my car's even running one... will have to check :P

I like my BOV.... my Neon's, my sticker's, my boost guages, my stock everything else.....

CAUSE IT'S MY CAR.....

You should have heard the crap i got when i told people i was fitting Neon's....

now heap's of people say they really like them....

Go figure....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm going to slap an old nismo logo sticker on my spare one and sell it to the land of the free for a thousand bucks
    • lol, probably should have read further!
    • Well - they have arrived.  And they are easy on the eye to put it mildly... These only have three bolts - but for a start there is a key that fits with vacuum like precision..  And as you can see by my ruler, the interface is large..   I listened to a podcast on HP Academy about Dan (KiwiCNC) and I'm more than comfortable he knows what he is doing. R35 Bearing assembly should arrive later today so can mock that up for a look. Can't wait to get these on and get some brake pressure logging too. IMG_3860.MP4
    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
×
×
  • Create New...