Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 470
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

wow, that qualifying was amazing!!! and a bit anti-climatic at the same time!

was going to see if people were interested in getting together to watch the race tomorrow but i have stuff on =(

i think it'll be between lewis and vettel but here hoping a bit of rain will shake things up =)

  • 1 month later...

Thats not good news Steve....but with F1 having drastic changes next year and the introduction of new teams should be a breath of fresh air in the paddocks.....hoping that Ferrari have a lot better season next year then this season....Alonso in Ferrari outfit will be awesome at the same time hoping that Massa can recover 100% and back to his best form....

  • 2 weeks later...

Button gives Brawn the old back hander and signs with Mcdonalds ( Mclaren ) what a sook, goodluck driving a car built around Hamie's chuck it in style!!

the flying finn, who was lets be honest sacked from ferrari, is going to have a year off! another sooky lala, if he had any balls he'd drive for one of the new teams to help them get started, lookout 2011 Mark Webber!!!

I think Redbull the brand would get a better bang for there buck from the Finn, off the track, especially when he shows up to promo's rideing the iceman chopper!!! Lol

crazy for him to have a year off, ferrari are paying him more to not race than he'd get if he did, woulda been better off sticking him a customers car to help them!

i think Kimi taking a year of F1 is not being a sook but wanting to do what he has always wanted to and that is Rally driving....from memory he did compete in the Rally Finland and finished 15th so not bad for someone doing it once in a while and in one stage he kept up with the champ Loeb.....Button signing on to McLaren (or as someone said "McDonalds") is just a big power thing going to his head....I expect Brawn cars to be very strong next season as well.....for some reason i dont think that RBR will be signing or looking to sign Kimi.....their current drivers have the skill to win GP's and challenge for the world title, so why break a happy family :D.....

oh and yes Ferrari had to pay ridiculous amount to buy out Kimi's 2010 contract, just so they can get Alonso

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Oh, it's been done. You just run a wire out there and back. But they have been known to do coolant temp sensors, MAP sensors, etc. They're not silly (at Regency Park) and know what's what with all the different cars.
    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
    • I do this, I also don't get the joke  
    • Return flow cooler will be killing you I reckon. You can certainly push more through a low mount setup but they're good numbers for a stock looking engine bay.  Mine made 345rwkw (hub) at 22psi on 98 with a "highflow" on a stock manifold but it's a long way from a normal high flow or standard engine. I used one of those Turbosmart IWG-75's and it was great with the Motec running closed loop boost with pressure being applied to both sides of the diaphragm. 
×
×
  • Create New...