Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Recently had my 26/30 tuned. Running R34N1s, Trust dumps, nismo pump and 600 inj, Vipec plug and play. Stock FMIC. Produced 370 rwhp at 15 psi and 11.2 afr. Power drops after 6250. A brief run at 17 psi produced 390 rwhp

Increasing boost above 15 psi makes intake temps rise dramatically. The tuner (a good one) claims this is due to the stock cams that are choking the inlet (cooling gas) and outlet (restricting hotside gas escape).

I know the cams are responsible for the power nosing over at 6250 but can't see anything else in the setup that should cause intlet temps to rise so dramatically in relation to boost.

Just wondering if anyone has seen this on their own car and noticed a big difference with cams.

Thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/263003-small-cams-rising-inlet-temps/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

what cams are they? have you had any head work done? standard plenum?

cams are stock Rb26, so clearly too small for 26/30. mild head work / clean up. plenum is standard.

i think if his theory is correct it means that the 30 is producing enough exh to spin the R34s like mad but the cams are restricting air flow so the pressure just backs up, causing the over temp.

Recently had my 26/30 tuned. Running R34N1s, Trust dumps, nismo pump and 600 inj, Vipec plug and play. Stock FMIC. Produced 370 rwhp at 15 psi and 11.2 afr. Power drops after 6250. A brief run at 17 psi produced 390 rwhp

Increasing boost above 15 psi makes intake temps rise dramatically. The tuner (a good one) claims this is due to the stock cams that are choking the inlet (cooling gas) and outlet (restricting hotside gas escape).

I know the cams are responsible for the power nosing over at 6250 but can't see anything else in the setup that should cause intlet temps to rise so dramatically in relation to boost.

Just wondering if anyone has seen this on their own car and noticed a big difference with cams.

Thanks.

Does the stock intercooler get really hot on inlet, and therefore is unable to suck away enough heat

by the time the air gets to the outlet? if so, doesn't that indicate that the N1s are out of their efficiency island

and have begun turning into air heaters?

with an extra 400cc won't you be asking them to shift more

air at the same PSI (relative to a 2.6) therefore you get inefficient faster than a 2.6 application ?

Does the stock intercooler get really hot on inlet, and therefore is unable to suck away enough heat

by the time the air gets to the outlet? if so, doesn't that indicate that the N1s are out of their efficiency island

and have begun turning into air heaters?

with an extra 400cc won't you be asking them to shift more

air at the same PSI (relative to a 2.6) therefore you get inefficient faster than a 2.6 application ?

I'd also be looking at the turbo maps of the N1s...

It's all about air flow, not boost where they become inefficient, so moneypit could be well on the money...

And getting bigger cams, is just going to make the problem worse if he's correct.

cams are stock Rb26, so clearly too small for 26/30. mild head work / clean up. plenum is standard.

'Clearly'... based on what?

Without going into too much detail, i know of two 26/30's 'in the build' at the moment that will be using stock cams @ ~380rwkw with -5's.

Also being that are a good number of stock cam RB26's with -5's also making 380rwkw...

Im inclined to be pretty confident these two 26/30's will not have an issue with the stock cams 'being' too small.

Have you measured the pressure & temp directly before & after the I/C and compared???

I'd check that before going much further, the cooler might have a bit of a pressure drop/blockage and so on which you might find the turbos are making 20+ psi before cooler, and 17psi after the cooler in which case indeed they will be blowing hot air around potentially :D

R34 N1s are good for 400-450rwhp around the 20psi on stock capacity... So i think perhaps something else is wrong at this stage, im not one bit convinced its cam related

'Clearly'... based on what?

'clearly' based on the fact that the 3.0 is 15% larger than the 2.6. and the fact that the power drops off at 6250.

Also being that are a good number of stock cam RB26's with -5's also making 380rwkw...

and you are absolutely certain that they are using stock cams?

Have you measured the pressure & temp directly before & after the I/C and compared???

I'd check that before going much further, the cooler might have a bit of a pressure drop/blockage and so on which you might find the turbos are making 20+ psi before cooler, and 17psi after the cooler in which case indeed they will be blowing hot air around potentially :ph34r:

not yet but it is on my list of things to do; cooler is No1 suspect

R34 N1s are good for 400-450rwhp around the 20psi on stock capacity... So i think perhaps something else is wrong at this stage, im not one bit convinced its cam related

i am getting 390 at 17 psi so presumably this means they are on track for that power range.

I'd also be looking at the turbo maps of the N1s...

It's all about air flow, not boost where they become inefficient, so moneypit could be well on the money...

And getting bigger cams, is just going to make the problem worse if he's correct.

the N1s should be fine. exhaust flow is exhaust flow whether it's from an RB26 or RB30. if the RB30 was spinning the turbos so hard they were backing up, they would be producing a lot more than 17 psi.

1- 'clearly' based on the fact that the 3.0 is 15% larger than the 2.6. and the fact that the power drops off at 6250.

2- and you are absolutely certain that they are using stock cams?

3- not yet but it is on my list of things to do; cooler is No1 suspect

4- i am getting 390 at 17 psi so presumably this means they are on track for that power range.

I numbered - easier

1- You said for a 26/30, and that setup. There is no way, if anything the turbos are the limit, no where near the cams

2- 110% sure mate, one of them is my own. It will use stock cams, it will make 380rwkw. A similar setup was done late last year, same power stock cams

My build will be similar

3- The cooler itself is fine for over 350rwkw if OK (some cars i know are even closer to 400rwkw)... So there could be a blockage or part of it damaged even?

4- Yeah, you're on the marker almost as the 400-450rwkw comes 18-20psi on a 2.6ltr (well, its more like 2.55)

Steve - 390 is HP dude, no way N1's are making 390rwkw.

I numbered - easier

1- You said for a 26/30, and that setup. There is no way, if anything the turbos are the limit, no where near the cams

Steve - 390 is HP dude, no way N1's are making 390rwkw.

So the 2.6 is actually over cammed for its capacity?

Steve that IS 390 rwkw (and on stock injectors). Lol first posts states rwhp.

I am in Canberra but the car was tuned at Insight Motorsport. The Superlap Tilton Evo was there while my car was getting tuned. Thing is a weapon (obviously) and beautifully put together.

Ok, so 390kw from 34N1's.....surely not stock N1's?

I originally wanted to do either 34N1's or GTSS's for my RB2630 for hill runs. If you're in Sydney and have time, please drop me a PM and take me for a ride. Ill repay the favour with a ride in mine if you like :down:

Ash - VERY glad to see you're still doing the RB30 bottom end, good stuff mate!

Ok, so 390kw from 34N1's.....surely not stock N1's?

I originally wanted to do either 34N1's or GTSS's for my RB2630 for hill runs. If you're in Sydney and have time, please drop me a PM and take me for a ride. Ill repay the favour with a ride in mine if you like :down:

Steve it's hp not kw. To answer your question the response is very sharp. I'll let you know when I'm in Syd next.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...