Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all.

I'm looking for a turbo for my RB30DET project. My goal is 800 - 850hk on boost, and another 100 - 150hk NOS shot on the 1/4 mile track. (Flywheel HK)

Have 2 garretts and one tubonetics in mind.

GT4094R

GT4294R

Or the new GTK 850hk turbo.

8000 rpms limit, high lift cams etc etc..

Which turbo would be my be my best bet? Want as early spool as possible, but still within my goals

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/263268-help-to-choose-turbo/
Share on other sites

Whats "hk"?

A to4z will do 800hp if you get the rear housing correct. Cheap, easily available, heaps of parts made to suite - its a pinless procedure :bunny:

hk is horse kower. but I want to know what parts to suite are and how the procedure is pinless? where do the pins normally go in this suite? :down:

Hk is Hp.. Will use HP form now on. hehe.

Have searched, but cant find conclusive info. Especially on the GT-K series.

Im leaning towards the GT4294R, in a 1.01 trim.. How do you think that will boost on the 3 liter? I have seen the GT4294r compared to a HKS t51 kai unit? Is that correct?

If you want the results of those turbos on 3L motors, have a look on www.supraforums.com www.supraforums.com.au and www.mkiv.com. They've got all the results of turbo vs turbo on 3L based motors albeit 2JZ's instead of RB's :down:

I'd lean to a GT4294R for that power level if I were doing it. The GTK turbos I've heard references to being fairly laggy compared to a lot of the other turbos on the market but are probably tough as anything.

I am also leaning towards a GT4294R.. In one of the smaller trims. 1.01 is the one I'm looking the most at.

In the supra forums I cant seem to find that much info on gt4294r.. its either gt4088r they talk about, or waaay bigger (GT45) than my goals. Or HKS.

I think especially talking to people who have gone that crazy, the consensus seems to be that once you are heading for something more drag orientated and if its moving well out of the range of full on street friendly turbos such as the GT3582R and at most the T04Z (on a 3litre) then its best just be accepted you won't be getting much boost pulling from low revs etc you may as well just go for something silly as if you've got bored with 600hp, whats going to stop you getting bored with 800 after a while.

Thats not necessarily my opinion, but I know people who have been there and done that and they tend to feel that way. The GT4294R is a reasonably proven turbo, the GT4094R is marketed to be fantastic but I'm still not 100% sure on it - I've seen contrasting views on them and while they seem that they could be good I don't think they fit into the proved group, hence why I'd go for a GT42R as there are plenty who have made that kind of power with them and on a 3litre it shouldn't be too bad. There were quite a few around a few years ago that had GT4294Rs I think, just pretty sure they went up to GT4202R or bigger. If you want just around the 800hp mark then a GT4094R should get you there and may be a bit more lively under foot on the road - though the impressions I get is they still have the "large turbo" feel about them.

Hi.

Thanks for the replys. :-) I dont care if i need to be over, say 4500 rpms to get some action.

Arrrg its tough to deside.

The rule "get as small a turbo that will meet my demands" is in my mind.. And 800hk is the goal. So maybe I should just try out the GT4094R.. ? The maps for a GT4094R looks like they fit my goal.

The car should be more track day oriented than drag oriented... But its all how you define each? Monday I will try and call the shop were i usually by my turbos, and have talk with them. Monday the turbo will be bought.

The turbonetics GT-K series I have crossed out now.

So the finalist are GT4094R, or the GT4294R. And if using the rule "get the smallest turbo that fit the goal" applies then it should be a GT4094R.

What do you recon?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...