Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I got my R33 Auto tuned with specs below apart from the VG30 rear,

My Question is.. should I see more power once I put the Vipec on and retune?

My goal once fitted and tuned is 250rwkw(that would be around the 275-280 if it was manual so thats about all for a stock motor) and quicker spoolup and midrange.

Are these realistic expectations?

Dave

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/264263-life-after-vipec/
Share on other sites

do you mean going from one ECU type to another?

then if thats your question, no as the ECU doesn't make power

the state of the tune, so going from a remap / PFC / HKS etc to Vipec wont make any difference in power

and if it does, your old ECU wasnt tuned properly

if you mean from stock ecu to Vipec then yes, youll make heaps more power (everywhere)

For some reason its gone out of tune, dunno why, Ive been told that the stock computer still has too much control and a standalone would get longer lasting results.

It now pings on high boost(15psi) and blows black smoke out the pipe most of the time, and is slowly getting worse, Have been running on low boost(10psi) for months now.

I realise the change of ECU wont give me a better HP figure but thought the bigger housing and a bit more boost on a standalone ECU with a good tune might do it.

Also.. always runs Vortex98 and was slowly getting worse even before changing the rear housing.

Edited by Turbo Dave

Another question is what type of cat are you running?

i had an xforce on my car for 6 months before it failed and my car was knocking all over the place. Chinese = bad.

Im not sure if everyone will agree with me but id say you should get a good after market fuel pump at those power levels.

Edited by silverr34gtt

2 guys in Sydney that i know running the same hiflow but with stock housings are making 280rwkw@20psi on their RB25's.

If I can get somewhere around that I will be stoked.

If i dont get the result from the hiflow what would be the next stepup from the hiflow?

Something in the 300-350rwkw region but with minimal lagg so as not to suffer too much with the auto?

I plan on building a forged motor in the future to run a bit bigger setup but wanna max out what I have at the moment!

Edited by Turbo Dave
Something in the 300-350rwkw region but with minimal lagg so as not to suffer too much with the auto?

HKS 3037 Pro S running E85 will do the job quite nicely.

Edited by RB25DETS2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
    • Welcome Adam. Car looks great!
    • "With a 1.5-WAY, the LSD is effective only during acceleration."
    • Well it wasn't as easy as I thought.... and it also wasn't in my original manual which I did end up finding. They discuss the process in the Nismo catalogue though and it requires slight machining. Page 145.  NISMO PARTS CATALOGUE 2020
    • I'm an idiot, my intercooler is rated for 1000hp. I had clicked on the wrong product. Knowing the delta P would be nice, but I'm doubtful I'll do it. Now as for an EMAP, that would be great and I'll get around to it eventually but from my findings in my last post, I'm considering a turbo swap now. 
×
×
  • Create New...