Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well, it finally happened!!! Dark has, at last, told his “Juliet” how he feels about her.

I think we’ve all been privy to his musings and angst ridden deliberation over what to do about this princess named Michelle. Many of us have offered counsel and tried to give him the benefit of our wisdom. I for one have been particularly anxious to see him subjugate his nerves and bite the bullet. So much so that I’ve often become quite vociferous in my urgings.

However I am pleased to announce that I received a PM on Monday heralding the dawn of a new age. Dark informed me that he had, in fact, strode up to his beloved and despite at least 10 others in her presence, proclaimed his feelings for her.

This courageous action was met with applause and cheers of respect and approval from his fellows and special gratitude from its intended recipient.

I would therefore like to dedicate this thread to both Dark and Michelle (if she’s reading) and convey my congratulations to the young man.

Lets hope that Michelle will eventually feel ready to fully reciprocate and share Dark’s feelings and that they will hook up officially. At that time I have offered to blast down to where ever he lives, swoop up him and his lady before heading to my joint for many a vodka with me and any other of the SAU inner circle crew that wanna have a few.

I’ll need a co-pilot though as I’ve never been to where ever it is that Dark actually lives.

Who’s down?

:rave:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/26461-dark-only-by-name/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

This is what caused the banning.

Excessive whoring, cheap shots (someone's mum I recall) and very much stretching the 'no racist comments' line.

Sure - there was provocation, but the subsequent retalliation was just a bit too much for most to put up with. Kinda like Terrance - it simply became annoying.

If you guys still want to 'chat' - take it to the wasteland.

Good luck with your woman Dark... this thread be closed.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/26461-dark-only-by-name/#findComment-560496
Share on other sites

in plain english? compared to what ed said?? lol

well.. here..

today, michelle was sitting around with all her friends.. like 10 of them.. and i felt sorta nervous.. coz i'd be outnumberd.. but my friend said.. you have to lose ur dignity in the process.. otherwise its not gonna be worth it  

so i went up to her.. and told her exactly how i felt about her.. infront of everyone.. when i finished.. they all yelled out "go tharaka" lol.. i thought it was quite funny..  

then i told them all.. that thats it.. and i walked off..  

i lost all my dignity at the start.. but then when they all cheered for me.. i got it all back.. :D  

then at lunchtime.. michelle told me that it was the nicest thing anyone had ever said to her...  

i asked her out.. but she said that she wasnt ready quite yet =[.. she told me she'd say when she is ready..  

i'll be the first one in when she is ready..  so i guess all is good..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/26461-dark-only-by-name/#findComment-560744
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...