Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys

just wondering has anyone tried/used the gt3582r on there rb25?

im looking at upgrading my turbo, at the moment im running a kkr480 with 50mm ext gate on 18psi making 240rwkw ran 115mph.

has anyone had issues with the gt3582r internal gate? can they hold boost etc

would it be a worthy upgrade or not worth it? want something with more punch!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/265130-rb25-turbo-upgrade/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

get a 3076, more power, about the same response as the KKR junk :P

hey im chasing more mid range torque plus ya top end power, my kkr i make 1.4bar at about 4800rpm, i want it at 3800rpm if possible. but with the same torque. til redline.

would 3076 make 250rwkw on 14psi? so 18psi could i push 280rwkw and 120mph+?

do they make 3076 internally gated? do they hold boost or creep?

im not really into the mood of hacking into another exhaust housing and gettin a 50mm ext gate welded on again! its why im considering iternal gate

Edited by l0WRB

i have an internal gate 3076, it holds boost fine if you make the dump properly. i'm making 250rwkw at 17psi. all in around 3900 on the road. if i was going to do it again i'd go external from the start

i have an internal gate 3076, it holds boost fine if you make the dump properly. i'm making 250rwkw at 17psi. all in around 3900 on the road. if i was going to do it again i'd go external from the start

oh ok thanks 4 that. see no point upgrading if im only gonna gain 10kw at same boost level, not worth the 2.5g to do it!

i kinda want a turbo that makes 250rwkw at 1bar and perhaps 280-300 at 1.3bar-1.4bar

i had one if not the first 3582r-iw sold in Aus, mounted on my 25

it started out low mounted and then high mounted on a etm manifold, and i loved it.

my car was running a built r33 auto with highstall.

the turbo had a 18 psi actuator with a .82 rear and would see 20 psi between 4000 - 4200rpm

going up a lg hill in overdrive ive seen 5 psi at 2500 rpm, Laggy i think not.

in my eyes this is the same boost response to the 3076, yet the potential for future power is allways there.

i have since sold this turbo and manifold to another SAU member and he with a manual and e85 has produced 380 rwkws,

on a stock motor with lg injectors at around 23 psi.

i think they are the one of best suited turbo to the rb25 you can get.

a wise man "nismoid" once said, a poor man pays twice

so why choose a 3076 to get the same response and less power?

you then want more power so you sell it and get a 3582.

get a 3582 to begin with and do the job once.

as far as internal gate's go above 20 psi,

the 3582r-iw with .82 rear has no boost control issues that i have found when set up correctly.

post-24852-1239583376_thumb.jpg

thanks dangerman! well this is the turbo im really looking at going 2!

i only wanna run around 1.3bar because motor is still stock, motor has run 1.3bar for 2yrs nearly now and no signs of giving in yet lol

where is the best place 2 start looking? price wise etc.

Two things:

1) If you aren't going to get >250rwkw on a GT3076R, then you won't on a GT3582R either - both can flow that power level at that boost level without an issue.

2) A .82a/r GT3582R feels WAY spongier "around town" driving than a GT3076R, saying they respond/drive the same as a GT3076R is ridiculous.

Agreed fully with Nismoid, recommending a .82 GT35R over a GT3076R is basically saying "Why get 280-300rwkw with good response when you can spend the same and make 280-300rwkw with more lag??" There is a dude on here who has cracked 350rwkw with a .68a/r GT30R running E85 on his RB25DET. GT30R ftw.

Two things:

1) If you aren't going to get >250rwkw on a GT3076R, then you won't on a GT3582R either - both can flow that power level at that boost level without an issue.

2) A .82a/r GT3582R feels WAY spongier "around town" driving than a GT3076R, saying they respond/drive the same as a GT3076R is ridiculous.

Agreed fully with Nismoid, recommending a .82 GT35R over a GT3076R is basically saying "Why get 280-300rwkw with good response when you can spend the same and make 280-300rwkw with more lag??" There is a dude on here who has cracked 350rwkw with a .68a/r GT30R running E85 on his RB25DET. GT30R ftw.

im assuming you have a 3076 dyno print out to compare to mine?

or is all that just your personal opinion without actually owning one?

spongier?

the host is asking about drag racing not going shopping

Im glad Lith said it and not me lol...

But come on, a bit of logic.

The larger compressor wheel in the GT35 cannot be as efficient as the GT30. It flows more, and a reasonable amount more too considering the 50-70rwkw

From what i remember in my GT3X days, the rear ends on them are identical, its just the front wheel thats changed... so going to a larger front wheel whilst making more power/flow (clearly), is not going to have the same response.

A dyno print out isnt a good gauge either... anyone can load up harder and get a better curve.

Hey Dangerman hows things mate.

I think Lithium is refering to my HKS3037 on E85.

Heres a plot with Adrians and my car on the same dyno (Willall's)

GT3582 vs HKS3037 .68

Lee

Edit: Picture not working properly but is on the last page of the E85 thread up the top.^^^^^

post-46183-1239679793.jpg

Edited by RB25DETS2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...