Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Fark!!! Just checked...

Only the outside one is connected to anything!! I feel cheated.. :P

At least the OEM R33 GTS-T muffler was a genuine twin outlet.

On the plus side, a new muffler, now counts as a performance mod, rather than just a cosmetic change... :P

and you wonder why I say exhaust should be the 1st mod done to a turbo M35?

Edited by iamhe77
  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

you better hurry dude :ermm: lol

if you can make the stagea meet this coming weekend, bring it with you! its a public holiday the next day.........

Can't make this meetup (hope to make one soon:)), PM your bestest offer for loverly, giant exhaust to make your car sing!

canonexh.jpg

  • 5 weeks later...

i've been trying to figure out what exaust i have on my RS4S.

what does the "SR" stand for on the label thing underneath?

i know blitz do a nuspec SR exhaust.. although mine seems a tad corroded for me to make anything more out on it than the SR.

IMG_0512.jpg

exhaust.jpg

i found this one online.... aparantly a blitz nur spec SR

"JASMA" stamp from Blitz keeps the police happy in JP apparently??

SSPX0019.jpg

just want to know if i'm on the right track or totally wrong? :sick:

Blitz makes sense as i have a

Blitz FMIC,

Blitz BOV,

and i think its a Blitz POD filter.. but unsure as i cant see any stamps on it.

i presume he had a thing for Blitz :)

Edited by atomaly

hmm blitzy!

yeah it probably is a blitz, if the rest of the car is....

and Jasma is (so im lead to believe) a testing place that approve the exhaust sound levels. however i think their limit is 96db where in australia its 92(i think) but thats pretty close

hmm blitzy!

yeah it probably is a blitz, if the rest of the car is....

and Jasma is (so im lead to believe) a testing place that approve the exhaust sound levels. however i think their limit is 96db where in australia its 92(i think) but thats pretty close

ahhhh the "SR" is just a safety standards thing to do with JASMA!. just went on their website

i'll have to try and see if i can figure out what it is as i couldnt see anything other than the plate on it.

any idea of where the brand stamp might be hiding ? :rofl:

if its not on one of the stainless cans, or on the tip, it may not be on the exhaust at all. my apexi N1 didnt have any branding anywhere on it, but came out of an apexi box!

and Jasma is (so im lead to believe) a testing place that approve the exhaust sound levels. however i think their limit is 96db where in australia its 92(i think) but thats pretty close

Actually, 92dB is ALOT quieter than 96dB.

nope, its about 2.3 times as loud if it doubles every 3db..... i think

Yup.

Edited by iamhe77
Isn't 96dB is twice as loud as 92dB?

Just adding some useless information :(

When Jet & I were in Charlestone Exhaust fitting his dump pipe, Bruce needed some help with testing the dB of a overdone Ford that was there LOL

Jet held the sound thingie and it registered a 120db if memory serves me right LOL

It was noisy, and smelly :)

the epa test is quite specific with exhaust testing. so its entirely possible he would get a lower reading. mind you its still over :( but who cares, its a volvo, and clearly that P plater in the skyline has the loud exhaust.......

  • 3 weeks later...
Posting in an old thread.

But 10db is a double in perceived volume. 3db is a double in power.

agreeing an in old thread :)

percieved volume will also change with ambient air pressure/temperature/humidity.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
    • Well this shows me the fuel pump relay is inside the base of the drivers A Pillar, and goes into the main power wire, and it connects to the ignition. The alarm is.... in the base of the drivers A Pillar. The issue is that I'm not getting 12v to the pump at ignition which tells me that relay isn't being triggered. AVS told me the immobiliser should be open until the ignition is active. So once ignition is active, the immobiliser relay should be telling that fuel pump relay to close which completes the circuit. But I'm not getting voltage at the relay in the rear triggered by the ECU, which leaves me back at the same assumption that that relay was never connected into the immobiliser. This is what I'm trying to verify, that my assumption is the most likely scenario and I'll go back to the alarm tech yet again that he needs to fix his work.      Here is the alarms wiring diagram, so my assumption is IM3A, IM3B, or both, aren't connected or improper. But this is all sealed up, with black wiring, and loomed  
×
×
  • Create New...