Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ahh sorry i should have explained better, yeah upgrading from the stock dump is a good idea. but i rekon changing from a 2.5" dump to a 3" will do stuff all. there is no back pressure required on a turbo car, there is already enough there supplied by the turbo :)

if the pipe is TOO big, especially off the back of the turbo, then the air wont flow away from it, it will come out the back and 'billow' around and create flow problems. the air is still hot and expanded already, so velocity is required (more so) to move it away from the back of the turbo faster, as it cools, i guess it doesnt matter, its waste anyway........

any one know if there are tuned length headers available for a VQ25DET?? i got some wicked spool times when i changed my manifolds on SR20s

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

any one know if there are tuned length headers available for a VQ25DET?? i got some wicked spool times when i changed my manifolds on SR20s

Haven't come across them yet.

In fact, I haven't come across many heavily modified VQ25DET's.

Edited by iamhe77
i guess there isnt much room in there to play anyway. plus it will generate more under-bonnet heat too........... hmmmm

mmm under-bonnet heat....

I do like Masa's partial solution to the heat issue with the externally venting front quarter panels.

Dolphin made a vented CF bonnet, but I think that productions ceased on that a while ago...

i guess there isnt much room in there to play anyway. plus it will generate more under-bonnet heat too........... hmmmm

Don't forget that the right manifold is coming around the back of the block between the fire wall and joining the left manifold at the turbo.

It would be very difficult to tune the length too much unless you go twin turbo.... Now there is an idea...

Don't forget that the right manifold is coming around the back of the block between the fire wall and joining the left manifold at the turbo.

It would be very difficult to tune the length too much unless you go twin turbo.... Now there is an idea...

Ahh yes.. TT. An idea that has been kicked around in my head for a while.

Would need pretty decent $$$$$'s to do it and, preferably, another intake box on the left of the engine as well as 2 return piping FMIC's... ooh yeah

actually would it REALLY be all that much work. after thinking about it, just a dual input FMIC and piping from the turbo to suit might do it. i mean besides all the exhaust manifold piping etc and the turbo mounting, oil and water lines, exhaust..... a lot of work, but possible!

actually would it REALLY be all that much work. after thinking about it, just a dual input FMIC and piping from the turbo to suit might do it. i mean besides all the exhaust manifold piping etc and the turbo mounting, oil and water lines, exhaust..... a lot of work, but possible!

lol. Anything is possible with the right $$$'s and expertise

Very noice.....

and if I may ask, what did that cost you? Also, which of the XForce Mufflers is that one?

Much as with my R33, the fake trims on the dual pipes is starting to get to me, different is that with the R33, a swap to a full GT-R cat-back with proper dual pipes was only $120 and 1 hours work fitting it away..

Edited by nickcorr

is it loud?

It's got a nice tone, real V6ie sort of noise, actually same as the big apexi but quieter. I was told it was legal ( < 95 Db's) ...and it indeed passed rego inspection yesterday.

It still sounds nice, actually I can hear my turbo and intake sucking air more clearly now and the BOV sounds louder too :)

the fake trims on the dual pipes is starting to get to me

Understandable.

Have you noticed that in the case of the OE "dual" pipe muffler, only one of the pipes is actually spitting out gasses?

The other is just for "show".

Fark!!! Just checked...

Only the outside one is connected to anything!! I feel cheated.. :P

At least the OEM R33 GTS-T muffler was a genuine twin outlet.

On the plus side, a new muffler, now counts as a performance mod, rather than just a cosmetic change... :P

Understandable.

Have you noticed that in the case of the OE "dual" pipe muffler, only one of the pipes is actually spitting out gasses?

The other is just for "show".

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • With stone chips, you really can't just try to fill them. You really have to sand that spot to lower the edges of the chip, so that the filler will end up covering a wider patch than just the chip. Otherwise, you're trying to have a sharp edged paint surface match up to some filler, and they just do not sand the same and you always end up with a noticable transition. A bunch of adjacent chips should be well sanded back, to round off all those edges, and use a lot (in a relative sense) of filler to raise the whole area back.
    • To expand on this to help understanding... The bigger/longer the block is, the more it's going to work to sit on your far away high areas, and not touch the low stuff in the middle. When you throw the guide coat, and give it a quick go with a big block, guide coat will disappear in the high spots. If those high spots are in the correct position where the panel should be, stop sanding, and fill the low spots. However, using a small block, you "fall off" one of the high spots, and now your sanding the "side of the hill". Your little block would have been great for the stone chips, where you only use a very small amount of filler, so you're sanding and area let's say the size of a 5/10cent piece, with something that is 75*150. For the big panel, go bigger!   And now I'll go back to my "body work sucks, it takes too much patience, and I don't have it" PS, I thought your picture with coloured circles was an ultra sound... That's after my brain thought you were trying to make a dick and balls drawing...
    • Oh I probably didn't speak enough about the small sanding block for blocking large areas.  In the video about 3 minutes in, he talks about creating valleys in the panel. This is the issue with using a small sanding block for a large area, it's way too easy to create the valleys he is talking about. With a large block its much easier to create a nice flat surface.  Hard to explain but in practice you'll notice the difference straight away using the large block. 
    • Yep I guessed as much. You'll find life much easier with a large block something like this -  https://wholesalepaint.com.au/products/dura-block-long-hook-loop-sanding-block-100-eva-rubber-af4437 This is a good demo video of something like this in use -    You have turned your small rock chip holes into large low spots. You'll need to fill and block these low spots.  It's always a little hard not seeing it in person, but yes I would go ahead and lay filler over the whole area. Have a good look at the video I linked, it's a very good example of all the things you're doing. They went to bare metal, they are using guide coat, they are doing a skim coat with the filler and blocking it back. If what you're doing doesn't look like what they are doing, that's a big hint for you  
×
×
  • Create New...