Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi fellas,

I am getting some new 19 inch rims with some dish soon and want them to sit a bit outside my guards to give it that tough stance that R33's ought to have... I am planning to also flare my rear guards out so having my rear rims/tyres spaced out is a must...

I am new to all this, can someone please provide me with some guidance...e.g. where to get spaces, how much extra width is enough and some pictures would be super...

Many thanks,

Kevin

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/266202-wheel-spacers-how-much-is-enough/
Share on other sites

ok, if u want the tough stance ur gonna have to lose the 19's, chances are they are tempe specials with shitty offsets, i could be wrong, but i doubt it. if u want that tough stance with wheels out of the guards, 18x10 +20ish, 245/45's, modify guards to suit (should be just a roll), done.

19's do not look tough on 33's, they look SXC that ud be NVS of, leave them for the sex spec cars, real men run >18" with low offset.

note: R34 GTR's can pull off 19's, V35's and 350's can pull it off too, but it needs to be done right, a lot of fiddling with fitment to get them acceptable.

Wow 10" width with +20 offset. That'd be fat.

I've got rolled rear lip and my 17 x 9" +38 measure 15mm space left before touching inside of guards with 255/40 tyres. So that'd be 17 x 9 +23 and it'd be just touching the rolled guards.

spacers not needed... just get the right offset...

how far do you wanna go?

here's mine...

DSC00011.jpg

that's 18 x 9.5 +30

do you want more?

Hi mate,

This is exactly what I want my rims to look like...exactly!!

So I should get 30mm spacers for both my front and rears then...ok, noted...the question is where to get these...I am absolutely clueless about spacers, please give me some details, i.e. brand, measurements and price?

More pictures of your car please...it looks really tough...any pics of it from the front?

Thanks fellas...

what size tyre?

if u go wider rim, and maintain tyre size, u can have the rim sticking out further, but the actual tyre tread stays in the same place, its the sidewall which makes up the extra width. this means u get the look of the wheels sticking out further, but having almost exactly the same clearance.

no.... the WHEELS are +30, there are NO spacers....

all wheels have 3 dimentions...

size (17", 18", etc)

width (9.5", 10" etc)

offset (+20, +12, -1 etc)

offset is the distance from the hub mounting surface to the centerline of the wheel...

so my rims are 9.5" wide with an offset of +30

that means that the dead centre of my wheels is offset positively by 30mm from the mounting surface.

the LOWER the offset the MORE they stick out

if i were to have say +12 offset the wheels would stick out an extra 18mm

2.jpg

see how the front wheels have a HIGHER offset than the rear's

any questions? :)

DSC00070.jpg

18 x 9.5 + 30 side on:

this is a link to a dyno run of my car... its the only photo i have of the new front end... also notice the lack of indicators as per your other thread :)

Wouldn't get spacers mate,

Having loose spacers is dangerous (especially if u give ur car a hard time around corners) and you risk having ur insurance claim denied (if they cause you to crash).

Better off getting the right offset.

Edited by Taso84

just remember the further you push the wheel out esp on the front . the more load it places on the wheelbearings and stub axle

hate to see a front wheel rolling down the road not attached to the car .

Thanks to all for your info...I guess I'll just stick to current rims without spacers and get new rims with the proper offset later.

Thanks to JJJ for your informative write up on offsets...cheers mate...your car looks really clean and tough!

no.... the WHEELS are +30, there are NO spacers....

all wheels have 3 dimentions...

size (17", 18", etc)

width (9.5", 10" etc)

offset (+20, +12, -1 etc)

offset is the distance from the hub mounting surface to the centerline of the wheel...

so my rims are 9.5" wide with an offset of +30

that means that the dead centre of my wheels is offset positively by 30mm from the mounting surface.

the LOWER the offset the MORE they stick out

if i were to have say +12 offset the wheels would stick out an extra 18mm

2.jpg

see how the front wheels have a HIGHER offset than the rear's

any questions? :P

DSC00070.jpg

18 x 9.5 + 30 side on:

this is a link to a dyno run of my car... its the only photo i have of the new front end... also notice the lack of indicators as per your other thread :dry:

Thanks for the very informative write up mate...btw, what mods does your car have 300 kws is shitloads of power for a RWD...wow...

stock internals, HKS 2835 pro s (.68), pfc, datalogit, injectors, afm, fuel pump, ex cam gear, clutch, fmic, coils, caster, camber, pineapples, sway's, struts, mech diff, rotors, pads, cosmetic shit

runs 311 on e85 (270 on pulp)

just remember the further you push the wheel out esp on the front . the more load it places on the wheelbearings and stub axle

hate to see a front wheel rolling down the road not attached to the car .

really? i would have thought the mounting surface being closer to the centre of the wheel (where the load is spread more evenly each side) would have been beneficial.

2 points here, biggest cause of failure there is from harsh bumps in the road, not from cornering force, here the car sits static with almost always negative camber, this means staticly there is more force on the inside of the wheel, and when u hit a bump the suspension compresses, causing more dynamic negative camber, putting even more stress towards the inside of the wheel.

so if the stress here is put on the inside of the wheel, putting the mounting surface closer to the inside of the wheel, or at least closer to the middle, means the load is spread more evenly at the mounting surface, and there is less leverage.

hard to explain, this might help:

offset.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...