Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all sau'ers...

Im currently upgrading my r34gtt rb25det neo, with bolt on mods.

I will be using a hks 2835 pro s as well as all supporting mods.

Now ive spoken with my tuner and he recommend for tomei poncams thats i use 252 degree 9.15mm lift as i will prodominantly be driving on road (mind you its my weekender toy) and the odd track day a few times a year.

Ok well im NOT looking to fry my engine, so i dont want to be sitting off the rev limiter and high rpm's as ive been told will tend to fail a lot faster and in turn cause engine failure.

Although contradictory to all that, i want to be able to get a fat torque range throughout the mids and have minimal lag with the hks 2835 pro s but as well keep some power up top for when needed. (eg qaurter mile runs etc)

now my concern/enquiry is even though my tuner has recommended 252 9.15mm lift poncams i have also heard that 260 9.15mm poncams work a treat...now im not 100% certain which would be more beneficial to my application, as ive said above i am mainly wanting to minimise lag, keep the torque and maximise the mid range and not have to rev the hell out of the engine to only make power in the higher rpm's which in turn would cause more wear and tear and failure in the long run. (alot faster that is)

what is your opinion on all this?? (obviously from experiences)

from what ive read....sydneykid tends to have a great understand of cams and how they may/can benefit an engine so im hoping he may make an appearance to this thread.

any help would be much appreciated.

thanks, Bass.

Edited by allthewaytotheskyline

unfortunately, SK is no longer with us on these boards, so if you dig up old threads with stuff he's written, that's the best you're going to get.

don't know anything about poncams, but maybe try the RB25 turbo upgrage results thread, and search in there, see what other people are running, and what their graphs look like.

good luck

i put the 260 in my car made more power everywhere

brings on boost earlyer as well

hmmmm intriguing, which turbo were you using and do you happen to have a before and after dyno graph to compare against??

also how much earlier did the turbo come on??

cheers, Bass

unfortunately, SK is no longer with us on these boards, so if you dig up old threads with stuff he's written, that's the best you're going to get.

don't know anything about poncams, but maybe try the RB25 turbo upgrage results thread, and search in there, see what other people are running, and what their graphs look like.

good luck

ive searched all the poncam thread and need more particular evidence on rev's and lag...also my particular set up with the hks 2835 pro s.

unfortunate that SK is no longer with us as he was quite the resource for information (i wondered why when i tried to message his inox it said it was full)

anybody know how to get in contact with him???

well after speaking to a few reputable workshops/tuners i have been advised against the 252 degree 9.15mm lift poncams and have been directed to the 260's as the 252's will barely be noticable and depending on the tuning the 260's should be perfectly fine for midrange and all over torque as well as brining on boost some what earlier then standard cams.

if anyone objects dont hesitate to speak up.

thanks for your help peepz.

Edited by allthewaytotheskyline

I had the 256º duration, 8.5mm lift Poncams with a 2835 ProS... was a nice combo... but I don't think Tomei make the 256º for NEO... anyway you want as much lift as you can get without having to mess with the head (new springs, buckets ect) and the least amount of overlap to keep it making power down low... those 252º have a good amount of lift they would be a nice street cam, don't rule them out

I'm going HKS GT 2835 Pro S on an RB25 as well and for cams have been told to keep the lift as low as possible if response is a concern. I think I'll stick with the 256 degree 8.5mm lift tomeis from nengun, good price too. HKS are 8.8mm lift and a bit more expensive.

AS a sough rule of thumb, for every 14 degrees of extra camshaft rotation, ie increasing from 240 to 254, your peak power will shift 500rpm to the right in this case.

That said i went from the standard 240 cams and 7.8mm lift to Tomei 256 and 8.5mm and my engine is still making power at 8000rpm.

Have very close to the same setup but i have a garret equivalent, cant remember exact numbers, and have the 260 cams, power around town speeds is fine it is a little lazy but hit 3500-4000 and it will pull all the way to 7300. In safe tune im getting 285rwkw and on country trips i can get 10.5L/100km.

im gonna try my luck with the 260's only as i was told the 252's will barely be noticable...and seeing that my 2835 pro s has a .68 rear housing that will bring the lag down substantially...so i will be able to bring the 260's in without harming much in the lag section.

what do you all think?

that will help :P

i'm just not a fan of cams... for a street/track application where you want quick boost response...

IMHO (and many people disagree) the $ vs kw is not worth it for cams.

ECR33 Series 1 (RB25DET) - Duration: IN,EX 256 Lift: IN,EX 8.5mm AU $ 837.43 AU $ 1,019.10

Nissan RB26DETT, RB25DET, RB20DET Exhaust Pulley AU $ 213.39 AU $ 247.19

that's nengun's current pricing there... so that's $1250ish plus the price of dialing them in on a dyno all for maybe 10rwkw...

imho, get the ex cam gear and spend the rest of the money datalogit/e85 (remembering i make 311rwkw on the same turbo)

without tuning costs, cams will be around $100/kw and e85 is $15/kw

or spend it on on handling... i'd be willing to bet there's some suspension stuff you need :D

AS a sough rule of thumb, for every 14 degrees of extra camshaft duration, ie increasing from 240 to 254, your peak power will shift 500rpm to the right in this case.

That said i went from the standard 240 cams and 7.8mm lift to Tomei 256 and 8.5mm and my engine is still making power at 8000rpm.

that will help :D

i'm just not a fan of cams... for a street/track application where you want quick boost response...

IMHO (and many people disagree) the $ vs kw is not worth it for cams.

ECR33 Series 1 (RB25DET) - Duration: IN,EX 256 Lift: IN,EX 8.5mm AU $ 837.43 AU $ 1,019.10

Nissan RB26DETT, RB25DET, RB20DET Exhaust Pulley AU $ 213.39 AU $ 247.19

that's nengun's current pricing there... so that's $1250ish plus the price of dialing them in on a dyno for maybe 10rwkw...

imho, get the ex cam gear and spend the rest of the money datalogit/e85 (remembering i make 311rwkw on the same turbo) or on handling (i'd be willing to bet there's some suspension stuff you need :)

Agreed :P

that will help :P

i'm just not a fan of cams... for a street/track application where you want quick boost response...

IMHO (and many people disagree) the $ vs kw is not worth it for cams.

ECR33 Series 1 (RB25DET) - Duration: IN,EX 256 Lift: IN,EX 8.5mm AU $ 837.43 AU $ 1,019.10

Nissan RB26DETT, RB25DET, RB20DET Exhaust Pulley AU $ 213.39 AU $ 247.19

that's nengun's current pricing there... so that's $1250ish plus the price of dialing them in on a dyno all for maybe 10rwkw...

imho, get the ex cam gear and spend the rest of the money datalogit/e85 (remembering i make 311rwkw on the same turbo)

without tuning costs, cams will be around $100/kw and e85 is $15/kw

or spend it on on handling... i'd be willing to bet there's some suspension stuff you need :D

Actually, thats some pretty good advice right there.

I have been tuning RB's for years and cams never do what the owner expects unless they are making close to triple stock power outputs of the motor. or is you intend to run massive boost. for anything less than 18psi and your turbo choice i would forget about the cams. especially on a neo.

spend the money on an exhaust manifold. or as joejojojojojojojojojjojojojojojojoj..... says handling :)

I can tell what SK found on their R33 RB25 and that was that headwork really paid off , with the standard cams and turbo .

At the time he told me that cams were an easier way to partly achieve what better porting and valve sizes do .

Personally I would err on the conservative side with cams for a couple of reasons .

First the thing gets wheeled out for a spin on the weekends so needs to be a nice drive on the street , torque where its needed most makes a much easier car to live with .

Secondly these RB25's are a single throttle inlet system so unlike an RB26's individual throttle system won't cope as well with longer duration cams and reversion .

Thirdly if you make the thing rev other expensive things need to be done to keep it reliable over time . Wear and tear lives at higher revs so if you can find ways to make torque at lower revs it should cut down on the wear/tear thing .

Personally I would put the money into headwork even if it meant buying another head to mod and fit when convenient , cams I'd do second and turbo last .

Thats what I'm doing with my R33 only the Poncams are in the head waiting to be fitted .

I guess I'm lucky , I got to see Gary's progress with that RB25 and it was done in stages so it could be still used between steps .

I only have one VG30 turbine housing and I wish I had two because if I did id use it with the std RB25 turbo when the head and cams go on , I want to keep mine for a Hi Flow if I go that way .

My 2c , cheers A .

Edited by discopotato03

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
    • You put the driver's seat on the wrong side! Incredible detail on all of this. It looks like you could learn a lot about the car just from assembling the kit.
×
×
  • Create New...