Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all, im in the process of searching for a set of jap rims for my s2 r33 but with so many choices out there i cant decide,

some of the ones i have been looking at are

rays ce28

work xd9

volk te37

super advan sar v2

etc

post up some of your ideas for the best looking wheels on a gtst along with size/offset and pics if possible

cheers Nick :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268339-best-looking-wheels-on-an-r33-gtst/
Share on other sites

white te37's :(

and i also dont mind the look of the white starcorp impuls (although i dont think they are japanese)

na, TE-37's look shite on gts-t's / gtt's, not enough offset to get depth into the spokes. GTR only, same with LM-GT4's

m2 hanbais dt05r in gunmetal. 18x9 +20 all round.

work meister s1 2 or 3 piece. 18x9 & 18x10.

work cr kai - 18x8.5 & 18x9.5.

work xd9 - 18x9 & 18x10.

desmond regamaster - 18x9 +20 all round.

any of those fron the top of my head and sizes close to those will be good as.

na, TE-37's look shite on gts-t's / gtt's, not enough offset to get depth into the spokes. GTR only, same with LM-GT4's

No, no they don't. Dezz has a set of them in 18's on his car and they look the shiz! I get all jealous everytime I see them :(

But yeah, +1 for SSR Professor SP1's. Real nice set of rims!

m2 hanbais dt05r in gunmetal. 18x9 +20 all round.

work meister s1 2 or 3 piece. 18x9 & 18x10.

work cr kai - 18x8.5 & 18x9.5.

work xd9 - 18x9 & 18x10.

desmond regamaster - 18x9 +20 all round.

any of those fron the top of my head and sizes close to those will be good as.

+20 would u have to make a few modifications to fit these offset, this is gtr territory isnt it?.

yer xd9s i like the look of, but i dont mind spending a bit of cash on forged stuff

ther is a user on here named blags who has xd9s on his 33 and the rears have a bit of dish looks mint

The difference between the gtst and the gtr should give you a clue as to what design of wheel would look better.

Because the gtst does not have the "phatness" of the gtr, Wheels with big dish go a long way to enhancing the appeal of the gtst from a looks perspective.

The gtr can get away with far less dish by virtue of its already phat look.

Wheels like meisters and starcorp impulse transform the skinny arsed gtst in to a car with way more street presence.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...