Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hay guys got a question for u could u safley use liquid nitrogen in an intercooler or any where else to get air intake temperature down ?

or would it crack your cooler beacuse it is too cold or cause problems further on in ur engine eg ur throttle getting frozen open due 2 ice froming on it ?

because it is liquid nitrogen and nitrogen is not combustible would it rob you of more power then it would possibly make ?

and could u easly inject it into ur intercooler ?

could u put it in a water injection kit and would it work ?

also how cold could it make ur intake temperature ?

Thanks guys for your help ! :D

I dont think injecting liquid nitrogen would be all that good....for your motor...being that its a liquid it would probably lock the motor solid once it entered the chambers, it would be like filling your intercooler with water.

you would need a very special container to hold the shit and that is where the problems would start and end i think there are too many variables with the stuff to warrant use in cars + i think it has a reverse effect it eats oxygen or displaces it so not good for an intake charge and it evaporates easily. no easy way of using it i think the fittings you would need to use it would be expensive to use and maintain and safety would be number one.

Hay zebra man umm liquid nitrogen i think is nitrogen gas that is at its freezing point and is in a liquid state but when it is heated up it turns into a gas and when it is sprayed into the intercooler i assume it would turn 2 gas even quicker ... and Air is 78.09% made up of nitrogen.. people with Methanol/Water Injection kits do there intercoolers fill up with water or is it just sprayed on the outside of the intercooler ? sorry zebra not having a go at u or anything

You liquid nitrogen idea has kind of been done already in a much more econmical fashion. CO2 intercooler sprayers do the same thing, except they can be filled up anywhere that services soda pop dispensing machines.

Water/meth injection is completly different.

Good point 3lit 32 but it is a gas in a liquid state so it can only be gas or liquid i think so it should not freeze when i heats up but if the air in the intercooler has high humidity it may form water vapor in and around the intercooler which may block the nozzle.

You are also forgetting that you will need to store the liquid nitrogen. If you can't keep it constantly cold then it will turn back into a gas. And the window is a very fine one. At -196c it is a liquid but if it goes to -210c it becomes a solid. At -195c it's a gas again so I'd say you would start the engine, run it for a few seconds and you'd have a big container full of nitrogen gas.

So would it work if i put liquid nitrogen in a empty water methanol injection kit ?

Well you could stop it from evaporating if your empty water methanol injection kit was really really well insulated, but it'd likely evaporate as soon as you injected it and that'd decrease the fraction of oxygen you have to burn.

The only way you'd use liquid nitrogen is in a heat exchanger with charge air. Forget injecting it into the engine.

Your main issue would be maintaining it at storage temp over time.

So would it work if i put liquid nitrogen in a empty water methanol injection kit ?

No it would freeze the container and the container would break.

Unless you want to make up a special container, with a special freezer, and a special injection kit that could somehow withstand the -196c temps....then your car would be very.....special

You are also forgetting that you will need to store the liquid nitrogen. If you can't keep it constantly cold then it will turn back into a gas. And the window is a very fine one. At -196c it is a liquid but if it goes to -210c it becomes a solid. At -195c it's a gas again so I'd say you would start the engine, run it for a few seconds and you'd have a big container full of nitrogen gas.

then assuming the container is unable to vent the gas fast enough to keep the pressure down it would probably explode.

Good thought but ..... effort > gains

If you were really keen just setup a co2 spray onto the cooler.

I setup a dodgy cage one time on my FMIC and filled it will dry ice for the drags, didnt notice a difference and my intercooler was an iceblock.

Efficient intercoolers shouldnt have that much heatsoak (unless its topmount), the only time you would really notice a difference is on a 40 degree day.

Edited by R34GTFOUR
Good thought but ..... effort > gains

If you were really keen just setup a co2 spray onto the cooler.

I setup a dodgy cage one time on my FMIC and filled it will dry ice for the drags, didnt notice a difference and my intercooler was an iceblock.

Efficient intercoolers shouldnt have that much heatsoak (unless its topmount), the only time you would really notice a difference is on a 40 degree day.

true on the intercooler for heatsoak and efficiency but I have read articles on dry ice intercoolers and they are seeing inlet temps of around -40c when set up properly.

It only last for the first pass and maybe half of the second.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...