Jump to content
SAU Community

How many RWKW will Nismo 555cc injectors make safely?  

47 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Hi Fellas,

I currently have 312 rwkw and the injector duty cycle is at 81% (using nismo 555 cc injectors), without a FPR

My aim is to get my power up to 360-370 rwkw. Using basic extrapolation ((0.81 x 365))/312)=94.7%), I get an injector duty cycle of around 94.7%.

However, if I install a Fuel Pressure Regulator (FPR), I will be able to increase the pressure, thus, making the injectors flow a bit more.

Anyway, I need you opinion on what power you think the injector's would max out using a FPR with my 555cc injectors.

My tuner is very confident they will make 360-370rwkw safely, as he has done it before.

Please place your vote!

Cheers

You dont need to bump something 45mins after you last posted in it dude...

Just be patient.

Your vote would be greatly appreciated!

Weren't you runing like 365 watts in your R31? What size injectors were you using?

I already have voted.

I used 740's - i knew the power i wanted, so i purchased injectors to suit it. :happy:

Im not a fan of FPR's if you've gotta buy injectors, you might as well buy the correct ones as i see it and use one of the better Nissan OEM parts.

For what you need, it'll be fine however to add in a FPR, bump a few PSI and make what you need.

without bumping fuel pressure your 555cc's would probably max out at around 330-340rwk

So generally speaking, how much more power does a FPR provide?

Also, are there any disadvantages to having a fuel pressure rgulator over bigger injectors? (Does it increase the chance of damage to the fuel pump? Or increase the risk of split hoses? Can a FPR damage injectors?)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...