Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My R32 GTR is pretty much stock except for: Nismo front pipe, catco ceramic highflow cat, apexi n1 catback, K&N panel filter, adj. cam gears (set for more midrange torque), Gizzmo MS-IBC

Compression results (psi, starting from cyl #1 to #6): 175,175,165,175,175,175

I would have expected about 220-250kw at the rears with these mods, but only getting 199kw at the rears with 14.7psi.

Boostworx said they found a leak at the inlet manifold gasket and it explains the low power, but I've been unable to find the leak myself and a mechanic who works on Skylines couldn't find the leak either.

If the timing belt has skipped a tooth, can this also explain why I'm down on power?

Another thing I thought of is K&N panel filter oiled nature, I brought it new and have never oiled it since it comes out of the packaging already oiled, could there be oil on my AFM causing the loss of power?

Any ideas I haven't thought of?

Forgot I'm running Nistune, with a fairly safe tune.

post-51527-1242114129_thumb.jpg

Edited by Moodles2
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/269666-r32-gtr-down-on-power/
Share on other sites

Hey Mate,

Sounds a bit strange, with those mods and running 1 BAR you should be able to break 200KW!

With the leak coming from the inlet manifold did they notice it under load or at idle?

It would definitely account for some loss of power but the question is why didn't they fix the leak upon discovery?

It's probably something you want to attend to sooner rather than later!

Doubt the K&N filter oil has clogged up your AFM's although you can always take em off and spray them with a bit off electraclean!

Goodluck.

Car was booked in for tune at the time, plus I insisted on going metal gaskets instead of genuine nissan paper types, I've been putting off doing it (since it's a 4.5-5hr job for a trained mechanic) because the mechanic who did the 2nd opinion for me couldn't find the leak. So I'm alittle confused

cat is new from justjap, it was installed with the front pipe at the same time, before that dyno sheet was taken

car runs good at the moment, idles pretty smoothly at around 1100rpm

Edited by Moodles2

Car is pretty much spot on for a untuned r32 GTR. The boost leak may explain it. Spray aerostart around the plenum and tb's if the idle picks up you have a leak (may not show up, as it may be a pressure only leak).

Nistune on your mods should see 215-230rwkw, we do them all the time. Must be a car issue.

Is it a new motor?

175 IMO is too high for a 20yr old RB26 in the vast majority of cases.

You can make 230-250rwkw on the stock ECU, so with a tidied Nistune - same deal, should be 230-250rwkw.

So yes its down on power especially considering you've got a bit of correction applied to that graph - so it would be even lower if the IT: was same as ambient.

Why didnt Boostworx fix the leak or tell you where it was if they found it?

Also - i wouldnt be running 1bar on R32 turbos mate - back it off to 12psi, if a turbo fails its highly likely it will destroy your motor - not a cheap excercise

Old motor, from 01/1994 with 62,xxx on the odo. If the cat has collapsed, if I hit the underneath with a pipe, will I hear loose bits and pieces shaking about, or will I need to take the cat out and inspect it?

I've tried Spraying WD40 liberally around the tb and plenum when idling but nothing, going to get some aerostart/brake cleaner and try again. Boostworx found the leak and were sure it was the intake manifold gasket advising me to run on low boost until the plenum it out and the gasket changed (since it's my daily I needed it, and decided to book it in later once ive sourced some metal gaskets)

Edited by Moodles2

unless you have a log book saying 62 - even then thats still high for a reasonably well km'd 32 IMO.

Not saying it would be a farked motor, just more so the comp test might not have been done right - try getting a leakdown test @ some point

ideally you want to drop it from before the cat - best way to diagnose some kind of restriction

maybe there dyno just reads a little lower than others / maybe they've inputted a wrong parameter

does it 'feel' slow? maybe drive another car with identical mods, Or even better hit the 1/4 mile and your terminal speed should be ~178km/hr+

just saying there might be more to it than a dyno readout

don't oil the filter - > not good for AFM's

mike

  • 3 weeks later...

Shaun at Boostworx says he uses the same dyno settings he uses for all 6 cylinder cars, cat is still intact (front and back). Boostworx made a mistake with the inlet leak diagnosis, had a 2nd mechanic try and find the leak and couldn't. Took it back to Boostworx and they couldn't find it again. Then again the day I had it dyno'd and tune tidied up it was a 45degree C day (and the dyno sheet says AT is 25, which if ambient temp is very wrong).

I've cleaned my AFMs, replaced my cam cover with a clear trust item so had a poke around in there. Boostworx installed the adjustable cam gears for me (4 degrees advanced on the intake gear, 0 on the exhaust gear). I remember before dropping it off, my CAS was dead center in the slots, it wasn't until yesterday I noticed it's current position (before replacing the cover) is to the left, between the extreme left and middle.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't that mean the current CAS position is retarding the timing versus where the CAS would be if it were in the dead center position?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The fab work can be as simple as a couple of silicon hoses and clamps to the factory piping. 
    • Just sounds like either way you need to do some fab work to get everything to fit, so why limit yourself at that point? If the GCG high flow option is zero effort in and out swap though I'd probably do that. It's almost certainly lowest risk, lowest cost, etc. The HKS GTIII-RS option that Kapr mentioned is laughably expensive for what it is, they charge the exact same for two turbos on the RB26 so their margins are off the charts on that thing.
    • Intake manifold is not a part of the issue. The turbo bolts to the exhaust manifold. That is easy. But close your eyes and picture the physical situation. That is a T3 flange on the manifold and a T3 flange on the turbo. As long as any new turbo has a T3 flange on the exhaust housing, that exhaust housing will bolt to the exhaust manifold. This places the exhaust housing in the same place as the stock one. But now move your mental attention a little further forward. The location of the compressor housing is set by the length of the turbo's core. The stock turbo had a long core. Let's say that it is..... 100mm long. So that would place the compressor housing 100mm forward of the exhaust housing. But a highflow, might well have a centre core that is shorter. Let's say that it is only 70mm long. Now the compressor housing will be 30mm further back in the engine bay than the stock one. This DOES move the turbo's compressor outlet backwards. It also moves the compressor's inlet backwards. You will very likely have to do some work to both the inlet and outlet piping to make everything connect again. I am not say this to make it out to be a bigger deal than it is. I am just pointing out that "bolt on" is sometimes not quite bolt on. The highflow from GCG that Murray linked above (https://gcg.com.au/turbo-charger-upgrade-skyline-gtst-2iu-xtrgts-s1.html ) uses a core that is the same length as the stock core, and so does not require this extra work. It will look very much like the stock turbo. No-one uses GTR turbos of any flavour (stock, or aftermarket) in a single turbo application on RB20/25. It's not a thing. Yes, people have been putting on GT3076, GTX3076 (and bigger and smaller versions of those) and G30s (of various sizes) onto RB20/25 since forever. But these are not "bolt on". Everything except the 4 bolts to the exhaust manifold change with these. And genuine Garretts are expensive. Non-gen, like Pulsar, etc, are cheaper, variously as good or nearly as good. But still not bolt on. No-one in the right mind would pay for an HKS turbo. Not in this modern day and age. Well, yes, the GCG highflow. You could ask HG what he can do to make the compressor housing sit in the original location. There are surely others doing highflows around the world. And some of the eBay/Temu ones (as reported by Dose) work and don't die. Bit of a lottery though. I would send your turbo to GCG (here in Oz) to be highflowed if you want a trivial no-extra-work option. But seriously, the work required to change inlet and outlet piping is not that hard. That's a boost control problem, not a turbo problem.
    • Thank you all for the replys 🙂 I know that intake would be different but that is one pipe at it is not that hard to get(custom one). I meant mainly bolt to the stock manifold and the turbo elbow. I looked and many sites/forums but they are just "old" with some old HKS turbos from GT-R i guess? What about some Garrets?  Or any other turbo? Is there even a turbo which i can just bolt on? 😄 And yeah i know about that new HKS but that is like 2000k USD without taxes/shipping in here   Iam getting a touch up tune but my "problem" is that on the "not" hot day iam getting peaks around 0,9 bar...and when it was around 15 Celsious i saw peak around 1 bar which is just too much for stock turbo. And of course turbo is old and i like to get some new one for a piece of mind 🙂 
    • I'm working on the assumption that our friend Jasmine here is a Russian (or, possibly Ukrainian) spammer/spambot, based purely on the number of such that I have been having to neuter in the last few weeks. IP address for the OP above was in WA. But that could have been via VPN. Posting at quarter to 4 in the morning is a good sign of being from somewhere in Europe. The last Jasmine that I kicked in the cooch was IP addressed in Ukraine. Even that could have been via VPN, and the bitchbot could have been from Russia, Serbia, China or anywhere. Regardless, was a spambot, so I killed it with fire. The fact that our new friend Jasmine here did not respond in any way to my tart query strongly suggests to me that this OP was just the establishment phase of a user able to be activated for spamming in a week, or 3 or 10.
×
×
  • Create New...