Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys thought i would start a new thread on my car so i can ask all questions/suggestions/comments on one thread.

People interested can follow my progress as i go..

Car is R33 S2.

Mods: (current)

-Split fire coil pack

-Full exhaust

-K&N filter

-Apexi Cooler

-Mines ECU (non programmable)-factory tuned to 12psi-14psi

-Turbo tech manual boost controller

-Greddy blow off

Made 207.8KW at wheels with stock turbo at 12 psi. Since then i ran 14 psi for a bit and blew the turbo. Upgrade here i come!!! Here is dyno chart for those interested:

image026.th.jpg

Installing:

Gt3040 AKA Garrett 3082r(top mount), manifold, external wastegate (40mm)

Aim is 240kw at wheels.-Suggestions? is it possible with this set up running 14psi on this turbo?

image027.th.jpg

Future: Aim 270kw

Power FC, fuel pump, injectors (in no particular order). Suggestions please?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/270210-modifying-r33-s2-in-progress/
Share on other sites

definitely not safe without a bigger fuel pump. that should be much higher on the priority list..

next thing is injectors maxing out... may need adjustable fuel pressure regulator/ new larger injectors to put more fuel into the engine to mix with the larger amount of air pumped in from the bigger turbo.

next thing is afm will be close to its max now, i dont think it would hold up to 240rwkw... so probably need a z32.

Thank you for your inputs.

Its clear that i must get a FUEL PUMP so ill be looking for a 040 pump from now on. Hopefully i find one soon so i can install it while the turbo is getting done, at the same time.

As for injectors, im not sure what to look for? What brand is good enough?

hi

for that turbo you will need

turbo

manifold

external wastegate

exhaust dump pipe changes

powerfc

boost control kit (or elec boost controller)

fuel pump (nismo or 040)

injectors (550cc or GTR might be ok with resistor pack, 550cc is probably easier)

z32 airflow meter

budget around $11k supplied, installed and tuned, no problems with 270rwkw

youll have problems with traction however

the cheaper solution? but a 2nd hand R33 GTST turbo for $300 and be happy with 200rwkw

hi

for that turbo you will need

turbo

manifold

external wastegate

exhaust dump pipe changes

powerfc

boost control kit (or elec boost controller)

fuel pump (nismo or 040)

injectors (550cc or GTR might be ok with resistor pack, 550cc is probably easier)

z32 airflow meter

budget around $11k supplied, installed and tuned, no problems with 270rwkw

youll have problems with traction however

the cheaper solution? but a 2nd hand R33 GTST turbo for $300 and be happy with 200rwkw

:D

you might find the 3040 will peak near 290rwkw ish

so its probably too much power for your requirements and budget

as you climb the power band, the cost $ per killowatt expotentially increases

ive had 200rwkw for about 5 years now and i have no issues with most cars on the street

i think ive had probably 2 vl;s and 1 or 2 v8s beat me properly

so you dont need 280rwkw to be quick on the street

for example if you got a hiflow or 2nd hand stocker and

spent some $ - maybe $2k on suspension youll make the quicker and handle heaps better

hi

for that turbo you will need

turbo

manifold

external wastegate

exhaust dump pipe changes

powerfc

boost control kit (or elec boost controller)

fuel pump (nismo or 040)

injectors (550cc or GTR might be ok with resistor pack, 550cc is probably easier)

z32 airflow meter

budget around $11k supplied, installed and tuned, no problems with 270rwkw

youll have problems with traction however

the cheaper solution? buy a 2nd hand R33 GTST turbo for $300 and be happy with 200rwkw

Okay lets see your list:

I have the following:

turbo-YES

manifold-YES

external wastegate-YES

exhaust dump pipe changes-YES

boost control kit (or elec boost controller)-YES

fuel pump (nismo or 040)-YES, got one today just need to pick it up.

New clutch-YES.

The following i will need:

injectors (550cc or GTR might be ok with resistor pack, 550cc is probably easier)-NO-not yet, looking

z32 airflow meter-Not yet, have to do more research to understand what it does.

powerfc-NOT YET-probably last thing because of tune.

I'm confused, people say you can run 240rwk on a hi flow on 17psi but you cant run 14psi on this turbo with out injectors and pump and z32 airflow meter? Or did i misunderstand that?

My initial plan was to go with these mods: (to achieve 240kw)

-Split fire coil pack

-Full exhaust

-K&N filter

-Apexi Cooler

-Mines ECU (non programmable)-factory tuned to 12psi-14psi

-Turbo tech manual boost controller

-Greddy blow off

-Gt3040 AKA Garrett 3082r(top mount), manifold, external wastegate (40mm)

-040 Fuel pump

-Clutch when this one goes

Basically i was hoping with that set up i would be able to run 240kw on 14 psi, and have room for improvement when i get bored of 240kw.

you might find the 3040 will peak near 290rwkw ish

so its probably too much power for your requirements and budget

as you climb the power band, the cost $ per killowatt expotentially increases

ive had 200rwkw for about 5 years now and i have no issues with most cars on the street

i think ive had probably 2 vl;s and 1 or 2 v8s beat me properly

so you dont need 280rwkw to be quick on the street

Yes you are spot on, i had the same experience. But i got raped by every skyline r33 i tried (2). So i they are fast in the same car, i wouldn't mind being a bit quicker too. But yea you are right, to get the upgrades now, its big bucks.

you cant tune the mines computer, all you can do is plonk it on the dyno

and hope the afrs are OK and it runs ok, given you are changing AFMS and injectors, its unlikely

it probably wont even idle - so unless you can find a shop to remap the mines ecu (try dr drift)

your stuck with a probably unsafe tune / unstable or youll have to replace the ecu

your better off changing injectors, AFM and ECU all at once

and getting it tuned once for the most safest power you can make

then use your brains to control the power or turn the boost down

doing a complete tune on one level of PSI, then months later

doing it again on another level of PSI is stupid

or turning up the boost later and hoping for the best (ie, without retune) is also stupid

i dont see why you need a Z32 or injectors..

Im getting 242rwkw with:

Highflow turbo

Mines ECU + Safc

Exhaust

Cooler

Pod

Walbro fuel pump

Shard adj Fuel Reg

Boost controller on 1 bar boost on safe tune..

Hmmmm, interesting. I see you have Shard adj Fuel Reg, do i need it on a big turbo, in you opinion?

ive had 200rwkw for about 5 years now and i have no issues with most cars on the street

i think ive had probably 2 vl;s and 1 or 2 v8s beat me properly

so you dont need 280rwkw to be quick on the street

and just how did you manage to overcome an ~ 80kw difference?

schumacher, is that you? :blush:

(seriously though, i would like to know)

Hmmmm, interesting. I see you have Shard adj Fuel Reg, do i need it on a big turbo, in you opinion?

Depends if you want more power later on..

I got use to the power in 2 months.. now i want more..

If you JUST want 240rwkw i say go highflow.. its cheaper..

Oh btw.. Dr Drift did tune my Mines ECU.. =]

Oh and if u get EPA'd, ull be taking the turbo out cos its aftermarket and it looks bigger..

I had no problems with the highflow :blush:

Depends if you want more power later on..

I got use to the power in 2 months.. now i want more..

If you JUST want 240rwkw i say go highflow.. its cheaper..

Oh btw.. Dr Drift did tune my Mines ECU.. =]

Oh and if u get EPA'd, ull be taking the turbo out cos its aftermarket and it looks bigger..

I had no problems with the highflow :blush:

I nearly went for hi flow but thought of future wants and needs so i opted for bigger turbo.

So dr drift tuned your ECU, what the rough price for that job?

As for EPA, i know. hehe o well we all take risks.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My first car was a HG. I'm very familiar with them. A mild cam upgrade is a good idea. The 186 is a very flexible engine - meaning it has good torque from down low. You can give up a little torque down low for quite a lot more excitement in the mid range, and a bit more up top - but they are not exactly a rev monster. You need to upgrade valve springs at the minimum. For a bigger cam, you'd want to make sure it wasn't still running the original fibre cam gear. That would be unlikely, given that most of them shat themselves in the 70s and 80s, but still within the realms of possibility. Metal cam gear required. Carbies are a huge issue. The classic upgrade was always a Holley 350, which works, but is usually pretty bad for fuel consumption. The 186S had a 2 barrel Stromberg on it that was very similar to the one on the 253, and is a reasonable thing if you can find one, and find someone to help you get it set up (which is the same issue with setting up a 350 to work nice). The more classic upgrade was twin sidedraught CD type carbs, or triples of same, or triple Webers. The XU-1 triple Webers being the best example. You can still buy all this stuff new, I think, but it's a lot of coin to drop. And then the people able to set them up are getting fewer and further in between. There's still some, but it used to be everyone's** dad and uncle could do it. **Not everyone's! But a lot. All in all, I wouldn't get too carried away with the engine. Anything you do to it without a full rebuild for power and revs will only make it slightly faster. I am all in favour of a complete teardown rebuild, with nice rods and pistons, 10 or 10.5:1 compression, and a clean port job with at least a big enough cam to run 98 with that compression, if not bigger. And if I did that to a dirty old red motor, I'd want to inject it too, which I'd struggle to fight against the devil on my shoulder that would argue for ITBs and trumpets. But the bills would start to mount up, and it will still never make stupid power. OK, a few people still know how to build absolutely mental red motors, courtesy of the work that went into HQ racing and modern knowledge being applied. But even a 300HP red motor is no match for an RB20 with a TD06. So you have to decide what it's worth to you. I'd just put a set of 6>2>1 extractors, a 2.5" exhaust and an electronic ignition conversion/dizzy on it and just run the old girl like the fairly slow old girl that she really is.
    • Thank you so much for the comments.  This is very interesting and gives me some great ideas to think about. Keen to keep it simple and relatively classic looking. That said, i am not too worried about staying 100% period correct.  A little extra performance and relatively good (or improved) economy is just what i am looking for. Ill be keeping any parts i swap out so if i get nostalgic i can always swap it all back in.  Right now just trying to get some good ideas from people in the know (I still have a lot to learn in this space). Thank you again!  
    • Wrt the engine, you're very much limited by 'production quality' as to how much extra power you can extract from them (I'm talking i6 red-motor) -- a lot here depends on how 'authentic' or 'period correct' you want the modifications to be... ...I'm too old... <grin>...the first true performance engine Holden made, was in the HD/HR models ~ this was the 'X2' performance pack...it came with twin downdraft strombergs on an otherwise unimproved intake manifold, with a two piece exhaust manifold (reckoned to be as good as extractors)... ....these engines were built upon the '179HP' cylinder block, which included extra webbing in the casting to make it stronger and less susceptible to block distortion... The next performance i6 came out with the HK Monaro (also found it's way into the LJ GTR Torana ... the car I wish I hadn't sold)...it had pretty much the same manifold setup, but was built against the '186S' block...this block retained all the extra webbing of the 179HP block, but added a forged steel crankshaft (instead of the stock cast crankshaft), because it was possible to snap the crank... ...apart from the inherent weaknesses in the stock (cast crank) blocks, the next limiting factor is the cylinder head porting & combustion chamber design, and the actual valve sizes. Back in the day, you could buy a 'yella terra' cylinder head (from stage 1 to stage 5 gradients), and this was the way to get serious power out of them -- with the extra breathing of these heads, you could fit a triple SU or DCOE Weber setup... ...obviously, these mods were a waste of time on a stock cylinder head/camshaft grind. My housemate rebuilt the i6 in his VH dunnydore about 6 months back -- this is a 186S block with the 12port 2850 blue motor head and intake/exhaust manifolds, with a dual throat Weber off an XF Falcon mounted on an adapter plate ; it's not a bad makeup...got more torque & fuel economy just light-footing it about on the first throat, but stand on it and it makes more giddy-up than the standard 2850 blue motor that it replaced. Personal note: I'd just fit an RB30 and be done it it 馃槂  
    • Thanks for sharing. That's a great video! My buddy is doing the same thing on his build (S chassis struts and towers). He's building an S14 with billet RB30 shooting for 2000whp... a race car with a TH400 just like this video. For a road car I just couldn't go this route as the strut has to be almost vertical and the caster is not going to pivot correctly (let alone camber gain). You think the R32 frontend is bad, wait till you put a MacPherson strut on without modeling it all in Solidworks to check geometry. I'm not saying it's a bad way to do it but I'd be really curious to see how it affects the geometry.
    • Hey Christof and welcome!  Sounds like an awesome project! I'm not sure many of the regular users on here would know much about the HK but I could be wrong.  Looking forward to updates.
  • Create New...