Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

GT-Rs are perhaps best described as "intelligent" 4WD.

Subarus, Lancers, and the like are basically FWD that also feed (constant) drive to the rear wheels.

GT-Rs on the other hand are RWD, and feed some drive to the front wheels when the system detects a need to do so. Not simply when (rear) wheel slip is detected, but also when cornering forces indicate a need for some FWD.

The GTR and GTS4 4WD system is unique to Nissan. There is no centre diff as in most other 4WD systems.

The way it works is that it behaves like a normal RWD most of the time, and under certain conditions, there is a clutch that will feed torque to the front wheels.

I believe the computer that controls the 4WD clutch looks at throttle position, as well as lateral and longitudinal accelerometers, and relative front/rear wheel speeds, and decides how much torque to feed to the front wheels.

It combines awsome straight line traction, but has none of the corner entry understeer of a full time 4WD. It is a very good highly developed system far better than full time 4WD.

Full time 4WD is probably better in mud, dirt, or snow, but the GTR system is more suited to driving on wet or dry sealed roads. It was made to win races, not drive around paddocks.

Hi SIR33, Warspeed covered it pretty well. I would only add that a GTR can have 100% torque to the rear wheels, whereas a front wheel drive based all wheel drive (Sub, Mitsi, VW, Audi etc) can only ever have a maximum of 40% of the engine's torque available to the rear wheels.

Since acceleration and cornering weight transfer is to the rear or diagonal, a GTR will always have higher traction capacity regardless of the suspension set up.

The Evo V111 (some 14 years after the R32 GTR) is the only car that even comes close. Notice "close" not "as good".

Hope that adds to the previous posts

This probably explains why alot of PRO-GTR drag racers are having a hard time getting the right setup with the correct torque split for the 4WD. There are plenty of GTST RWD's running quicker times than their GTR equivalents. This is something that HKS struggle with on their car too, apparently. Because all of those drag RWD suspension and tyre setups go out the window as soon as you try to do it on a 4WD.

Hi Zensoku, a lot of the fast GTST's run drag slicks, whereas a lot of the fast GTR's run street legal radials. There is a huge difference in traction and launch torque handling capacity between a proper drag slick and a radial.

Then there is the weight factor, it takes a lot of extra power to overcome a 250 kg weight handicap.

Hope that adds to the thread

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...