Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Holy shit...that thing would break traction in top gear. Weighs about 850kg...that's just...f***ed lol.

Edit: All that technology and it's got S15 air vents? Pfft...

Edited by Birds

I'm kind of interested to see how they designed the brakes. They don't look all too impressive from the images but if it can hold grip enough to accelerate that fast and perform equally well on the braking it should be great on the track, as long as you don't understeer into the wall.

Edit:

guessing it may be the same as the MT900R

AP 6-piston front calipers, AP 4-piston rear calipers, AP 378mm ventilated front disc, AP 355mm ventilated rear disc, Manually adjustable front / rear brake bias, Optional front and rear upright carbon brake ducts

Edited by MB2gtr
  • 4 weeks later...

i will believe it when the numbers are confirmed. not saying it isn't possible or that it won't be fast, but all the info comes from the IAD press release. hasn't been tested by anyone else yet.

also i think this will me be more of a straight line hero than a track car. it will be quick around a track but i think it will be too powerful to be super quick. i think round a tight track much less powerful cars will out perform it, kind of like how the veyron isn't that quick around a track.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My thought is if you were just moving it forward and the upstream geometry remained the same, then no difference at all. But because the current one has the filter direct into the AFM inlet, you effectively have the best chance of a completely symmetric air flow profile upstream, and in, the AFM, whilst the aftermarket inlet thingo has a (small, to be sure) bend between the filter and the AFM. That would bias the flow to the outside of the bend (downstream of the bend) which might well reduce the size of the signal seen by the AFM, for the same total flow rate. Having said that: If you're proposing to make your inlet look like a hybrid of your existing one and the aftermarket one, such that there is no bend where the filter is clamped on... then I say it will be just fine. If there is going to be such a bend, then, if you can align the insertion of the AFM blade such that it is at right angles to the plane of the bend, then there is a better than even chance that the centreline velocity where the blade is will remain more or less the same, and the velocity will just be a little faster to the outside of that, and just a little slower to the inside. **This is not professional investment advice and you should consult a suitably qualified ouija board, tea leaves or the intestines of a goat for more accurate prognostication.
    • Hi Tao, Thanks for your reply.  It's been a while and I managed to get the valve stem seals replaced with the head on the car.  Unfortunately this didn't solve my issue, the car still smokes a lot after idling (to be honest during idle you can see a bit of blue smoke from the exhaust), same after deceleration. I will try disconnecting the valve cover breathers, do I leave the PCV valve in? By engine oil drain pipe, do you mean the turbo oil drain?
    • What about if you just give it direct 12v and earth?
    • Hi guys . Can someone help me  I bought an Android screen for my Nissan fuga but it won't turn on   
    • My guesstimate, with no real numbers to back it up, is it won't effect it greatly at all.its not a huge change in position, and I can't see the air flow changing from in turbulence that much based on distance, and what's in front of it. Johnny and Brad may have some more numbers to share from experience though.
×
×
  • Create New...