Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys,

recently got my alarm installed from doug @ eastside installs but if i unlock the car, and i dont start the car within 30secs the engine re-immobolises but the doors dont auto re-lock! why? Doug said it was to do with the interior light coming on or somcrap and R33's didnt auto re-lock, sounded like bs - did he install it properly?

also the range is pretty short, about 5meters... he said this was the normal range for this type of alarm? anyone confirm

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/271696-mongoose-m80g/
Share on other sites

Exact same problem with mine. However mine doesnt have central locking to begin with so that might the reason (installed the central locking kit). But yea the range is shit. and sometimes you will have to keep pressing the button before you get any response (like you lock it straight after you unlock it).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/271696-mongoose-m80g/#findComment-4616789
Share on other sites

It should be an option (configurable). I have an M80 on my R34 so might be slightly different but for me it works as follows:

Unlock via remote: Don't open any door, the car will re-lock itself.

Unlock via remote: Open a door but don't start ignition, the car will re-arm the immobiliser but NOT re-lock the doors.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/271696-mongoose-m80g/#findComment-4616853
Share on other sites

It should be an option (configurable). I have an M80 on my R34 so might be slightly different but for me it works as follows:

Unlock via remote: Don't open any door, the car will re-lock itself.

Unlock via remote: Open a door but don't start ignition, the car will re-arm the immobiliser but NOT re-lock the doors.

as above

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/271696-mongoose-m80g/#findComment-4617154
Share on other sites

this is what happens with mine:

If i unlock the car and dont open the doors: the doors dont re-lock

the guy that installed it said it was because my cabin light comes ON when i unlock the car so the alarm thinks the door is open and thats why the alarm wont relock the doors, he wants some more $$ to come out and fix the range and autorelock :dry:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/271696-mongoose-m80g/#findComment-4617869
Share on other sites

It should be an option (configurable). I have an M80 on my R34 so might be slightly different but for me it works as follows:

Unlock via remote: Don't open any door, the car will re-lock itself.

Unlock via remote: Open a door but don't start ignition, the car will re-arm the immobiliser but NOT re-lock the doors.

+1.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/271696-mongoose-m80g/#findComment-4618005
Share on other sites

Would it work better if you just turned the center light off permanently?

You can always turn it on when you hop in the car or need to find something in the car..

I had a black-wire Cyclops alarm in 1 of my other cars and that did well.. was $250 from Ministry of Bass.. but it doesn't have as many options as viper or m80 obviously.. Its just an alarm and immobilizer really (connects to central locking if factory fitted) range on that remote is heaps far like 30-40 meters or through walls it has no problem..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/271696-mongoose-m80g/#findComment-4628405
Share on other sites

it really depends on the car. if its a later car then the BCM controls the light. meaning that when you unlock the car it turns the light on. if they pick the wire up for the doors on that side (light) then the alarm sees the door open and doesn't do as its supposed to.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/271696-mongoose-m80g/#findComment-4628624
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hey guys,

I'm not sure what immobilizer I have, but I can see a mongoose battery pack I think it's there to keep the siren going when the battery is dead *shrugs*.

The car also has that 30 second immobilizer function not certain if it auto locks itself I haven't check (at the moment I have it hidden in my fiance's garage until I get used to driving manual).

How do I check what immobilizer I have? Can someone post a pic of their remote?

I have a pair of greyish-black remotes with buttons "I" - to activate/deactivate and "II" to silence on it.

Cheers guys,

fibbo.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/271696-mongoose-m80g/#findComment-4854155
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...