Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i can allready tell this topic will be a hecktic one lol

but i read in a magazine (HPI) that by removing the mesh that is apparently ment to "smoothen out the flow" of the air going in will actualy give you 11% more flow with out them... they said there there mainly to stop the whetston bridge? (afm sensor) getting KO'd by random stuff if your pod falls off?? worth while to try im thinking just wanted to see what all you dudes thaught :D cheers.

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I always go by the rule that the factory put it there for a reason.

Also ... how much of that (claimed) 11% increase will you gain depending on what filter you run?

Seems like a too greater risk to me, for such a (realistically) small gain. I doubt you'd notice any gain.

Any other thoughts? :D

umm i would rather keep the mesh and not have the extra 11% flow and keep everything safe in the line Adam

but then again chances of that falling is pretty much none so would be worth giving it a go

I always go by the rule that the factory put it there for a reason.

Also ... how much of that (claimed) 11% increase will you gain depending on what filter you run?

Seems like a too greater risk to me, for such a (realistically) small gain. I doubt you'd notice any gain.

Any other thoughts? :D

Nissan put the turbo, boost solenoid, exhaust and suspension there for a reason too, why did you upgrade?

:D

they mightve put em there for a reason, but that doesnt mean those parts didnt suck. :D

ps, ill be buying some donuts from you me thinks.

Edited by scandyflick
Nissan put the turbo, boost solenoid, exhaust and suspension there for a reason too, why did you upgrade?

they were following certain neccessary things in building a new car, you cant roll a car off the production line with 95db exhaust systems and rock hard coil overs

however im sure they dont say, hey i know a way we can make this car go slower for no apparent reason

Nissan put the turbo, boost solenoid, exhaust and suspension there for a reason too, why did you upgrade?

:D

They're not sensitve to particles in the air :dry:

(turbo 'maybe' if you run no pod and drive thru sand storm)

Nissan uses black grills and mesh for a reason tongue.gif

Ouch! Why all the blue mesh hate :P

Edited by RubyRS4
they were following certain neccessary things in building a new car, you cant roll a car off the production line with 95db exhaust systems and rock hard coil overs

however im sure they dont say, hey i know a way we can make this car go slower for no apparent reason

The reason there is mesh in an afm is to keep the air flow at a consistent speed. If you remove the mesh you can get turbulence in certain portions of the cross section while the air starts circling around the inside of the tube, and that in turn gives your AFM an incorrect reading - yes you can force more air thru the tube if you remove the mesh but the electronics wont actually read it consistently because the sensor is in the middle of the tube - turbulence could put a dead spot in that very section (like the eye of a tornado)

-D

The reason there is mesh in an afm is to keep the air flow at a consistent speed. If you remove the mesh you can get turbulence in certain portions of the cross section while the air starts circling around the inside of the tube, and that in turn gives your AFM an incorrect reading - yes you can force more air thru the tube if you remove the mesh but the electronics wont actually read it consistently because the sensor is in the middle of the tube - turbulence could put a dead spot in that very section (like the eye of a tornado)

-D

And there you have it

[end thread]

:dry:

....circling around the inside of the tube, and that in turn gives your AFM an incorrect reading - yes you can force more air thru the tube if you remove the mesh but the electronics wont actually read it consistently because the sensor is in the middle of the tube - turbulence could put a dead spot in that very section (like the eye of a tornado)

TURBULANCE IN A TURBO wouldnt that make it go faster? twin turbulance super mod :dry:

Edited by Inline 6

i did this about 8 years ago in my 33 you can see a slight difference on the dyno n gained 4rwkw if i remember

yes it was a before and after thing and with no filter i gained like 8rwkw

if you have a decent filter on its a ok and free upgrade, tune does help it along also

but.. what does 11% flow equate to? ..2% increase in kws, 10kph increase in top speed, less turbo lag??

IMO prob only slightly faster spool up. Turbo size and filter used already determines volume of air. It would only have a small effect outside the effects of turbo and filter. I reckon its just spools up marginally quicker, but you'd wouldn't know it.

Anybody got any "on paper" testing/documentation?

Edited by RubyRS4

maybe replace it with blue mesh, it will get 11% for sure then

dont remove it.. unless you want to destroy the tiny ass hot wire on the sensor ....not worth it for 11% gain in seat of the pants take your spare out and stereo

Edited by sapphiregraphics
maybe replace it with blue mesh, it will get 11% for sure then

dont remove it.. unless you want to destroy the tiny ass hot wire on the sensor ....not worth it for 11% gain in seat of the pants take your spare out and stereo

yeah if u wanna go faster, follow my dads advice "Eat Less Kebabs"

Truer words ne'er spoken.

-D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, it's getting like that, my daughter is coming over on Thursday to help me remove the bonnet so I can install the Carbuilders underbonnet stuff,  I might get her to give me a hand and remove the hardtop, maybe, because on really hot days the detachable hardtop helps the aircon keep the interior cool, the heat just punches straight through to rag top I also don't have enough hair for the "wind in the hair" experience, so there is that....LOL
    • Could be falling edge/rising edge is set wrong. Are you getting sync errors?
    • On BMWs what I do because I'm more confident that I can't instantly crush the pinch welds and do thousands of USD in chassis damage is use a set of rubber jacking pads designed to protect the chassis/plastic adapter and raise a corner of the car, place the aforementioned 2x12 inch wooden planks under a tire, drop the car, then this normally gives me enough clearance to get to the front central jack point. If you don't need it to be a ramp it only needs to be 1-1.5 feet long. On my R33 I do not trust the pinch welds to tolerate any of this so I drive up on the ramps. Before then when I had to get a new floor jack that no longer cleared the front lip I removed it to get enough clearance to put the jack under it. Once you're on the ramps once you simply never let the car down to the ground. It lives on the ramps or on jack stands.
    • Nah. You need 2x taps for anything that you cannot pass the tap all the way through. And even then, there's a point in response to the above which I will come back to. The 2x taps are 1x tapered for starting, and 1x plug tap for working to the bottom of blind holes. That block's port is effectively a blind hole from the perspective of the tap. The tapered tap/tapered thread response. You don't ever leave a female hole tapered. They are supposed to be parallel, hence the wide section of a tapered tap being parallel, the existince of plug taps, etc. The male is tapered so that it will eventually get too fat for the female thread, and yes, there is some risk if the tapped length of the female hole doesn't offer enough threads, that it will not lock up very nicely. But you can always buzz off the extra length on the male thread, and the tape is very good at adding bulk to the joint.
    • Nice....looking forward to that update
×
×
  • Create New...