Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

lol, why 225.00kwS?

If this is in relation to the thread you made in vic section, then yes mate, turbo will be the "smartest" interms of cheapest, but its still not that cheap to get it all up and running....

get a turbo

I wish i could but im on p's

lol, why 225.00kwS?

If this is in relation to the thread you made in vic section, then yes mate, turbo will be the "smartest" interms of cheapest, but its still not that cheap to get it all up and running....

nah WYTSKY its coz im on my p's i wish i could but yeh...

FYI the "smartest" thing to do would be to learn to drive. Upgrading the thing behind the wheel is the best "bang for buck" performance mod you can do, and it'll carry over to any car you own in the future.

As for nos ill pass im not Bryan O'connor

You've got GT-R "badging" on your name but you drive a 2WD Skyline, so if the last movie is anything to go by you're closer to O'Connor than you may think.

Stroking will cost like a few K. Cams yeh i surpose.

Good luck hitting 225kW with an old, non-turbo, 10+ year old, 2.5L engine that doesn't have VTAK or some other cam profile fiddling shenanigans. A stocker will make 140kW[/url] so you're effectively asking for 50% more power than a reasonably fresh engine.

There's no way you're doing that without cracking open the engine if you don't have boost or bottle. And that's going to cost you more than "a few K" to do.

Edited by scathing
FYI the "smartest" thing to do would be to learn to drive. Upgrading the thing behind the wheel is the best "bang for buck" performance mod you can do, and it'll carry over to any car you own in the future.

You've got GT-R "badging" on your name but you drive a 2WD Skyline, so if the last movie is anything to go by you're closer to O'Connor than you may think.

Good luck hitting 225kW with an old, non-turbo, 10+ year old, 2.5L engine that doesn't have VTAK or some other cam profile fiddling shenanigans. A stocker will make 140kW[/url] so you're effectively asking for 50% more power than a reasonably fresh engine.

There's no way you're doing that without cracking open the engine if you don't have boost or bottle. And that's going to cost you more than "a few K" to do.

Hahaha i like keyboard warriors like you. Really entertaining and full of ego but stop before you embarrass yourself ok? First off Without seeing me drive how can you make an automatic assumption of my driving skills? you have no right. Secondly Does the badge in my name really have to correspond with what i drive? Does that mean i have to be a GTS right now and once i get a GTR i have to re-register and THEN call myself RxGTR? Maybe its the future car i want. Maybe its the car i worship so don't i have the right to put it in my name if i choose too? Without anyone flaming me?

Your NA RB25 will not make 225 KW naturally aspirated for under, say, ten grand minimum. At my trade prices.

Stroker kit: Tomei, 2.8 litre kit. Nearly 10 grand by itself.

Cams: Needed for higher RPM breathing - RPM being the only real way to increase your power considerably. Custom ground from comp cams is around 1500+ for a pair.

Independant Throttle Bodies: Can do it yourself with 4AGE ones and a modified intake, but still I would believe that alone would cost 3 grand.

Exhaust: a good $1500.

ECU: at these power levels neccessary - another 2 grand lets say tuned.

PLUS: a slew of other components from wiring to injectors to fuel pump and everything inbetween.

Even then its not gonna happen. Not without a RB30 bottom end and a modified RB26 head anyway.

You say you want to do it cheap? Let me put it to you like this. Your suggesting that without spending big dollars your car will DOUBLE its stock wheel power output?

Dream on.

Learn to drive first, I don't care how skilled you SAY you are your still a p plater in a NA skyline i.e. nothing special (unless of course you have raced at tracks since a young age go-karts, then once you had your licence normal open track days). Do some advanced driving courses at your local track. Not THAT expensive plus they are really worth it.

I'm not flaming - you don't have realistic goals. Realistically you could get, say, 130 RWkW's out of an R33 gts without spending a ridiculous amount of money. Not 225kW. Does anyone on here have a naturally aspirated stock engine size with that power? No. No they do not. Many R33 and R34 GTS-T's don't make that much power.

Research first. Otherwise you just sound like an idiot.

Edited by R33_Dude

save the money now, sell the car for when your off your p's, and then buy a GTR, simple,

everyone wants everything NOW, well you cant have the cake and eat it too, not flaming you or anything,

because once you get to say 200 or 225kw your gona want more and more, it never stops lol, i turboed my car thinking il be happy with 180-200 atw,

i have 180+ on it at the moment, and im already over it, dont get me wrong it will be fun, but for how long?,

wish i was patient and saved the money that i have put into my car, would have bought myself a R32 Gtr, a few nice ones on the forums with fresh rebuilds,

peace

Your NA RB25 will not make 225 KW naturally aspirated for under, say, ten grand minimum. At my trade prices.

Stroker kit: Tomei, 2.8 litre kit. Nearly 10 grand by itself.

Cams: Needed for higher RPM breathing - RPM being the only real way to increase your power considerably. Custom ground from comp cams is around 1500+ for a pair.

Independant Throttle Bodies: Can do it yourself with 4AGE ones and a modified intake, but still I would believe that alone would cost 3 grand.

Exhaust: a good $1500.

ECU: at these power levels neccessary - another 2 grand lets say tuned.

PLUS: a slew of other components from wiring to injectors to fuel pump and everything inbetween.

Even then its not gonna happen. Not without a RB30 bottom end and a modified RB26 head anyway.

You say you want to do it cheap? Let me put it to you like this. Your suggesting that without spending big dollars your car will DOUBLE its stock wheel power output?

Dream on.

Learn to drive first, I don't care how skilled you SAY you are your still a p plater in a NA skyline i.e. nothing special (unless of course you have raced at tracks since a young age go-karts, then once you had your licence normal open track days). Do some advanced driving courses at your local track. Not THAT expensive plus they are really worth it.

I'm not flaming - you don't have realistic goals. Realistically you could get, say, 130 RWkW's out of an R33 gts without spending a ridiculous amount of money. Not 225kW. Does anyone on here have a naturally aspirated stock engine size with that power? No. No they do not. Many R33 and R34 GTS-T's don't make that much power.

Research first. Otherwise you just sound like an idiot.

Hehe another keyboard warrior. And you're another person automatically assumes things.. how sad... im surprised that you even bothered commenting when you knew that you were going use an aggressive stance

save the money now, sell the car for when your off your p's, and then buy a GTR, simple,

everyone wants everything NOW, well you cant have the cake and eat it too, not flaming you or anything,

because once you get to say 200 or 225kw your gona want more and more, it never stops lol, i turboed my car thinking il be happy with 180-200 atw,

i have 180+ on it at the moment, and im already over it, dont get me wrong it will be fun, but for how long?,

wish i was patient and saved the money that i have put into my car, would have bought myself a R32 Gtr, a few nice ones on the forums with fresh rebuilds,

peace

Thankyou J3TR33 ill take your word and start saving. At least you're not the typical douche bags thats here to flame p-platers. thankyou again

If you have no budget constraints it might be possible at a stretch..

Guaranteed, if you do work it that hard and it would have to be "fully worked" it'll be a temperamental pig of a thing to drive.

A much better idea is either more cubes or forced induction.

Been there, lost that.

save the money now, sell the car for when your off your p's, and then buy a GTR, simple,

everyone wants everything NOW, well you cant have the cake and eat it too, not flaming you or anything,

because once you get to say 200 or 225kw your gona want more and more, it never stops lol, i turboed my car thinking il be happy with 180-200 atw,

i have 180+ on it at the moment, and im already over it, dont get me wrong it will be fun, but for how long?,

wish i was patient and saved the money that i have put into my car, would have bought myself a R32 Gtr, a few nice ones on the forums with fresh rebuilds,

peace

+1

lol, this guy wants help, he gets it and then calls them keyboard warriors.

if you really want that power, look at a motor upgrade to either Ls1 OR 350z/V35 worked motor which will cost more then a few k.

theres a few na guys here running just over 150rwkw with quite alot of $$$$ put into them.

you're talkinga bout 225kw at the wheels or engine?

then there is missr34 who got 177rwkw with nos.

lol, this guy wants help, he gets it and then calls them keyboard warriors.

if you really want that power, look at a motor upgrade to either Ls1 OR 350z/V35 worked motor which will cost more then a few k.

theres a few na guys here running just over 150rwkw with quite alot of $$$$ put into them.

you're talkinga bout 225kw at the wheels or engine?

then there is missr34 who got 177rwkw with nos.

lol unfortunately flaming isn't help.

Ive re- thought maybe around 150kw. smarter?

Hehe another keyboard warrior. And you're another person automatically assumes things.. how sad... im surprised that you even bothered commenting when you knew that you were going use an aggressive stance

He stated facts. Gave real examples of what would be needed to possibly achieve that power figure without turbocharging.

Now you mentioned that you fall under P Plate restrictions, and your user name has underneath it Melbourne Victoria.

http://www.arrivealive.vic.gov.au/initiati...pply_if_yo.html

From this date a probationary licence holder cannot drive a vehicle if it has:

  • An engine of eight or more cylinders;
  • a turbocharged or supercharged engine (except diesel powered vehicles);
  • an engine that has been modified to increase its performance; and/or
  • any of the following high performance six cylinder vehicles as published in the
    Government Gazette:

To get 225KW out of a N/A RB25, some SERIOUS engine modifications will need to occur! It's not simply a case of no turbocharged cars and thats all. Take for example the 350Z.

Decide whether you want to keep this Skyline and modify it in the longterm (whether it be turbo modification or whatever), and then decide whether to drive it till you're off your P's and can drive a turbocharged Skyline. If you're happy to keep it N/A for now and want to make more use of power, then as said, improve your driving skills, get out on the track, do suspension and handling modifications and learn to control the car and get the most out of it in its N/A form.

Driving skill is something that takes years to develop, and even then practice makes perfect. 225kw's in a rear wheel drive is a lot of power compared to the 90-100rwkw that an N/A Skyline puts down at the wheels in its stock form, and without the supporting mods to control that power as well as the driver skill, things can turn ugly quickly.

Just a few supporting mods to control this sort of power: Tyres that can reliably put down 225kws, the right suspension set up, and brakes to stop that sort of power. Three important things that really you can do now, in preparation for more power when you're off your P's. No point having all that power if you can't get it to the ground, and stop the car just as quickly as it goes.

Now before you call me a keyboard warrior and flaming, I'm 23, I'm on my P's till the end of this year, fortunately I don't fall under the restrictions...however... I spent a year modifying my R34 starting with suspension, wheels/tyres, and brakes, BEFORE I started modifying it to get more power. Guess what? I don't regret it one bit! It has made me a better driver now, I feel more confident and more in control of the power I now have. We all have to crawl before we can walk.

The fact for you though is that you're on your P's, and therefore the law is going to look at you differently, even if you are a sensible mature driver. It's a sad but true fact.

Now to answer your original question, the smart way to make 225kw out of an RB25DE is to turbocharge it. If all you're after is a big power figure out of an N/A car whilst falling within your restrictions, then sorry to say this, but a N/A Skyline isn't going to be the car of choice. Like madbung said, more cubes or forced induction, and there are plenty of other 6 cylinder cars with more than 2.5litres.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...