Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just interested to see who has completed a 10 second pass using these turbo's. I recently did [email protected] with 1.85ft and was only allowed two passes. However I think there is another .2 left in this setup without using the gas.

-5s have done over 400rwkw before, and 380-390rwkw fairly easily many times. I dont think one is easier than the other from what the GTR's around here do.

How much power was that with again Paul? that was the 430rwkw?

I'll have to go and read some stuff, but I'm not totally sure 500rwhp and 126mph works out that well.

You should get 10's on -5's without gas

-5s have done over 400rwkw before, and 380-390rwkw fairly easily many times. I dont think one is easier than the other from what the GTR's around here do.

How much power was that with again Paul? that was the 430rwkw?

I'll have to go and read some stuff, but I'm not totally sure 500rwhp and 126mph works out that well.

You should get 10's on -5's without gas

ive given the weight and MPH...so the power level should be easy to work out.

to make it easy it was between 400 and 420 depending on how the engine was feeling on the day.

im pretty sure the day before racing we dyno'd it and a figure of 404 AWKW at 2 bar seems to ring a bell.

Edited by DiRTgarage
ive given the weight and MPH...so the power level should be easy to work out.

to make it easy it was between 400 and 420 depending on how the engine was feeling on the day.

im pretty sure the day before racing we dyno'd it and a figure of 404 AWKW at 2 bar seems to ring a bell.

I had a rough idea :dry:

Was more for everyone else's benefit :domokun:

And ye, get a .2 on the 60ft time, that's the 10 second pass done

I had a rough idea :dry:

Was more for everyone else's benefit :domokun:

And ye, get a .2 on the 60ft time, that's the 10 second pass done

yeah 2 10ths at the slow end will net 4 10ths at the fast end.

btw..i could easily work out how much power you were making given the trap speed and weight.

Its just that some like to claim crazy hp figures..then trap speed at the track indicates they could not have been making that kind of power.

My previous ride was an aspirated torana that ran 9.5 @ 141...i was just more curious to see what kind of hp guys were making compared to their et thats all...trap speed tells no lies though ,unlike some dyno's or owners.

btw..i could easily work out how much power you were making given the trap speed and weight.

Its just that some like to claim crazy hp figures..then trap speed at the track indicates they could not have been making that kind of power.

My previous ride was an aspirated torana that ran 9.5 @ 141...i was just more curious to see what kind of hp guys were making compared to their et thats all...trap speed tells no lies though ,unlike some dyno's or owners.

my car is well known and its power output is quite public due mainly to the car entering dyno comps which are ran under strict conditions. My MPH has always matched the dyno output of the car...the 400m dyno never lies.

The car had made 460KW+ at the tyres with the HKS 2530's but was never ran with that level of boost (2.5bar) at the track.

its funny how some people like to elevate the power level of their car only to be caught out when they run it down the strip. Some of this is often not the car owners fault but of dyno/workshop operators trying to inflate their ego's or abilities. Ive seen it time and time again at dyno comps too when cars don't come near a figure it made at (insert workshop name here) and blame the dyno or operator only to have my car go on and be within a few KW of what it normally makes.

Edited by DiRTgarage
Its a little presumptuous to assume just because a car runs lower power in a comp than expected that the tuner/workshop is inflating figures don't you think?

Sometimes, i would say yes.

However as past threads go, there seems to be a fair bit of 'inflating' going on sometimes :thumbsup:

Just interested to see who has completed a 10 second pass using these turbo's. I recently did [email protected] with 1.85ft and was only allowed two passes. However I think there is another .2 left in this setup without using the gas.

i guess thats better than some cars in perth running close to 500rwhp and trapping at 118mph :thumbsup:

126.5mph might squeeze you into a 10 but you will need decent tyres

i think there have been a few 32's in perth that have run 10's at 127mph

I didnt think it was possible to make that kind of power with these turbo's..

Im not doubting you at all dirt ,only surprised that you made 460kw.

I think i will definately be going with a set of these.

Although i am fairly new to gtr ownership..a few guys i have spoken to have said you wont make 400kw or over with the 25/30's .

shows how much they really know i guess.

10.34 @ 134

1474KG without driver

street tyres

no nos

HKS 2530's though

my car is well known and its power output is quite public due mainly to the car entering dyno comps which are ran under strict conditions. My MPH has always matched the dyno output of the car...the 400m dyno never lies.

The car had made 460KW+ at the tyres with the HKS 2530's but was never ran with that level of boost (2.5bar) at the track.

its funny how some people like to elevate the power level of their car only to be caught out when they run it down the strip. Some of this is often not the car owners fault but of dyno/workshop operators trying to inflate their ego's or abilities. Ive seen it time and time again at dyno comps too when cars don't come near a figure it made at (insert workshop name here) and blame the dyno or operator only to have my car go on and be within a few KW of what it normally makes.

What fuel??? I would've thought that 2.5 bar even on race fuel would be pushing shit up a hill.

I've seen around 370rwkw with the -5 on about 25psi of boost on a tired race engine RB26 on pump98.

I would like to think that you might see around 420rwkw with race fuel tho.

I didnt think it was possible to make that kind of power with these turbo's..

Im not doubting you at all dirt ,only surprised that you made 460kw.

I think i will definately be going with a set of these.

Although i am fairly new to gtr ownership..a few guys i have spoken to have said you wont make 400kw or over with the 25/30's .

shows how much they really know i guess.

467 to be precise...done at Powercruise dyno comp...its on the dvd for all to see. VP 104 fuel was used and 34psi of boost...we actually removed the actuator lines and let the turbo's produce as much boost as they could muster...yes im crazy!! ( a few little dyno comp tricks were also used that netted nearly 20KW more than it had ever made before )

the set-up was fairly simple...Full HKS 2530 turbo kit...4 inch cooler...Power FC...stock plenum. The engine was one of my builds with all Nissan internals except pistons, rod bolts and cams. It was built tough and copped an absolute thrashing for 3.5years before the N1 oil pump expired at 9500rpm banging it off the limiter launching at WSID.

I remember the night we cracked 400 at the treads on pump fuel...we thought it could never be done. Then we put race fuel in it and made another 42KW!!...ahh those were the days. Now if i dont make over 600KW im disapointed... :D

Edited by DiRTgarage

With the sort of boost that Dirt is talking about with a splash of good fuel that power level wouldn't be unbelievable. My own car R33GTR RB28 with 2530's is making 417awkw on 1.4bar (21psi) at at only 7100rpm on bp ultimate pump fuel and the power on the dyno sheet is still climbing so with full rpm 8500 it would be making an easy 425awkw and 2530's dont really come into their effeciancy untill the see at least 1.7bar (25psi) anyone wanting to check out the dyno graph it is posted in my build thread in the motorsport section dazmos R33GTR track car.

What fuel??? I would've thought that 2.5 bar even on race fuel would be pushing shit up a hill.

I've seen around 370rwkw with the -5 on about 25psi of boost on a tired race engine RB26 on pump98.

I would like to think that you might see around 420rwkw with race fuel tho.

Almost all the GTR's here, PULP - 380rwkw... 20-22psi tops. (2.6ltr)

Big $$$ motors will do over 400, and have done :(

That tired motor wasn't doing many favours, probably needed the extra few PSI to counter the blowby :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Haha I do that.. thats when it chirps..The bit point for me is almost non-existent. Otherwise I stall it. But yes, in terms of performance, the clutch is solid af.
    • Greg speaks wisdom. These dirty old Datsuns are only value when they are cheap. When they are not cheap, there is no value. Sounds contradictory, but it's true. We are now 20 years past the hey day of modifying cheap 90s JDM cars for small amounts of money. This is a different world. If you are rich and can afford not to care about what is effectively wasting money on an old Datto shitter, then I have no reason to argue against it. But if you are wanting to experience what we all experienced back in 2005 (and I bought my car last century!) then there is no way to do it.
    • Short answer: No. Medium answer: No, because you still need to conjure the things out of thin air to bolt them to a NA to make it a NA+T. Long Answer: No - The things you need to conjure - meaning a turbo, intercooling, manifolds, exhaust, intake/manifold/piping, clutch, injectors, fuel pump, AFM (?), ECU + Wiring (woo, N/A loom fun) have to come from somewhere. You could have many scavenged these things from an OEM car that someone had upgraded from and use some of these. This will be cost prohibitive now, especially so in the USA. You'd probably pay the same for newer, upgraded components that are better than old OEM stuff from 25-30 years ago. None of these big ticket items are re-usable for the N/A car. Why not buy new and upgrade while you're there? The only real consideration is turbo and fuel sizing and determining whether you want to stay within the bounds of the OEM engine or get into rebuild territory. These limits ARE lower with a N/A motor and especially N/A gearbox at the starting point. And if you're gonna upgrade those then you may as well consider having them built to begin with. Because everyone here knows you're never far from that next engine rebuild once you start making the power you want... The cars you see on the internet and SAU etc have been built over decades. If you're really clued in... you would sell your US car to somebody for what you paid for it. You would then scour AU JDM pages or SAU and buy a car like Dose's on this forum with your powerful American Dollar. This will save you so much money in the long term. Importing it could be tricky. Or it might not because USA. I have long said the only reason 90's Japanese stuff took off was because a) Japanese people had Japanese cars so that is what they used b) Australians could import these cars to Australia with very minimal changes and use them on the road here c) Neither country had well-priced access to US or EU Sports Cars. I don't believe the JDM scene would have taken off in Australia at all if we had EU priced EU BMW M offerings, or more especially the AUS V8 Scene would never have existed if we had the multitude of US cars like Camaros, Mustangs, Corvettes at the prices you folks do. After all - Do the math. I would say put a V8 in your R34 and that's the smart way forward. It is. I did it. I know this from my own experience. But at that point there's no reason to simply not buy a C5 or C6? It would be simpler and easier and cheaper and bette-
    • Reading all this... hurts lol. I have an ENR34 5MT and I paid an inflated USA price for the car alone, had to do tons of preventative maintenance past that, and so I'm over $30K USD into the car already and haven't even touched power.  I wanted to +t it. Not even trying to make GTR numbers, I'd be happy with 250hp.  Can I get away with paying much less to make that happen?
    • Damn you’ve done well, definitely snapping necks.
×
×
  • Create New...