Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I have a ps3 n xbox360 and as most games come on both consoles i jst wanna know which one should i opt for? So far most games ive bought are on ps3 cos of the bluray compatibility or am i going about it wrong?

Which is a better console related to processing speed/graphics etc

thanks

-Johnny

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/275579-buy-games-for-xbox360-or-ps3/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

They are virtually identical in power/graphics.

Do some research as you will find most answers you get with questions like these are not based on evidence. Of course someone who owns only one system will state the system they have is the only choice. Just like the above poster.

The ps3 i think has a faster processor

The 360 has a better graphics processor

The majority of games on both the 360 and ps3 look and play better on the 360.

I have both systems and when i have the option to by a game for either system i always go for the 360. The controller suits me better and it plays and looks better. However for fighting games where you use the dpad i would choose the ps3 as i dont like the dpad on the 360.

Edited by Pattygtst

Well I would say PS3 for the pure fact that they reigon free. You can buy a game from overseas and be about $20-$30 cheaper (inc. delivery) where as the Xbox360 is region locked so you can't get some games (MLB 2K9 I really want on X360 but it's not coming out to Australia and it's reigoned locked to the US)

The Graphics on both systems are marginlly the same - some has better qualities than the other.

I have ps3/360/wii. Obviously the wii is only party games and stuff so I dont really bother with that for console games.

When I go to buy a game that's on both consoles, I consider who I am going to play the online stuff with, so depending on what style of game and what console those friends have. I dont really consider the graphics etc, as previously said, it's not that different over both consoles.

if there is heaps of online stuff I tend to go for the 360 cos I think xbox live is a fair bit better than the the online psn network.

They are virtually identical in power/graphics.

Do some research as you will find most answers you get with questions like these are not based on evidence. Of course someone who owns only one system will state the system they have is the only choice. Just like the above poster.

The ps3 i think has a faster processor

The 360 has a better graphics processor

The majority of games on both the 360 and ps3 look and play better on the 360.

I have both systems and when i have the option to by a game for either system i always go for the 360. The controller suits me better and it plays and looks better. However for fighting games where you use the dpad i would choose the ps3 as i dont like the dpad on the 360.

:P

Technically, two - PS3 and PC.

I had an Xbox 360 but didnt find it worthwhile keeping - only thing that kept me playing it was Forza 2, everything else I could play on the PS3 or the PC. I also had a Wii for a short period of time because my girlfriend wanted it, eventually sold it as it didnt offer much games that interest me and she only wanted it to play Mario Kart Wii.

Best mate has both PS3 and 360, tbh I'm glad he bought both because I like playing the exclusive games like Resistance. I wouldn't buy one myself though. BTW Activision is looking at withdrawing support for PS3 as of next year.

I reckon they're bluffing, although their sales on the PS3 are fairly poor - but then again, the only descent game they have is COD... which will be better on PC than any console anyway.

Guitar Queero is (for now) still selling truckloads of copies, plus the upcoming dj hero and tony hawks games among others.

After playing the PS3 and 360 a fair bit, I can't see anything about the PS3 that makes it better - when you put a new game in it decides to take 10 minutes dumping random files on the hard disk, the games are still in standard definition, there are no rumble packs in the controllers (not to mention siaxxis was a complete flop), and the controllers aren't as nice feeling as the 360.

Dunno about you, but I know 2 people who have a PS3 - everyone else has 360's!

The multiplayer on Xbox live also canes anything PS has to offer.

The main problem with the 360 is the propensity for the 3 red rings of death due to the shitty cooling system, but if you're the first purchaser and have resisted the urge to open it up for whatever reason, you can get it repaired free of charge.

PS3 runs 7 nvidia 512 cards and the xbox runs 5 512 ATI cards.

PS controller is tryed and proven and in my opinion the best controller shape and feel you can get, i never really liked the xpox controllers.

most if not all xbox games are on PC anyways (got one of those)

6 axiss is great for the right games, and all the new PS3 boxes come with dual shock controllers (ive still got the old non shock, battery lasts longer that way)

most peeps buy the xbox cause its cheaper, and for the online support, which is fair enough, but PSN is free unlike Xbox live.

and the MAIN reason behind buying a PS3 for me (other than the fact it was a Bday present from the missus) is the GT games, and killzone 2, greatest games ever :blink:

dude resistance 2 is like Gears of War for PS3, I've played a fair bit of it, and it was dissapoint.

I've only played the one game with Siaxxis, The Godfather, and it was more annoying than useful.

Most gamers I know would spend as much as it cost to get the premium gaming console, I was initially a fan of the PS3, but after seeing how good the Xbox games looked on a high definition TV, I was sold on it. You would also think that with something like 25GB a disc that there would be more content in the games as well.

Beer Baron, I don't know where you got your PS3 from, but all those I've played have come out with non rumble controllers?

Edited by bozodos

yeah my launch came with non rumble controller but they have been available to buy for ages now, and for the last year or so they ship with them too. I have 2 rumble ones and one original non rumble one from launch. :thumbsup:

They are exactly the same. You wont even notice a difference graphics wise. Games amde for ps3 and then ported to 360 will look a fraction better and vice versa (you wont even notice the difference.) The ps3 downloads files to the HDD so it reduces load times.

What is this about xbox live being better? Because you have to pay for it you want to believe your money is being well spent? Stop being a fanboy

edit: also don't forget some sites compare the ps3 to xbox graphics using the ps3's composite cable which is NOT hd

Edited by topher_

PS3 and xbox dont look the same, theres something so slightly different about the way they look, dunno what it is, but ive never liked the xbox, or 360's picture that much.

and yes $90 -$100 for a PS3 controller is a violation, id rather not rumble for that price. btw PS2 controllers work for most games in the PS3 as long as you have a USB adaptor from USB to PS2 (awesome adaptor to have, costs 4 bucks, and then you can use the PS controller on games like TMN, GRID, Dirt, and all those other awesome PC driving games)

yeah the price of dual shock controllers here is rude. I bought some in japan about 2 years ago and they were about $45-$50 which seemed about right.

but all PS3s do ship with them standard now and have done for quite a while.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You won't need to do that if your happy to learn to tune it yourself. You 100% do not need to do that. It is not part of the learning process. It's not like driving on track and 'finding the limit by stepping over the limit'. You should not ever accidently blow up an engine and you should have setup the ECU's engine protection to save you from yourself while you are learning anyway. Plenty of us have tuned their own cars, myself included. We still come here for advice/guidance/new ideas etc.  What have you been doing so far to learn how to tune?
    • Put the ECU's MAP line in your mouth. Blow as hard as you can. You should be able to see about 10 kPa, maybe 15 kPa positive pressure. Suck on it. You should be able to generate a decent vacuum to about the same level also. Note that this is only ~2 psi either way. If the MAP is reading -5 psi all the time, ignition on, engine running or not, driving around or not, then it is severely f**ked. Also, you SHOULD NOT BE DRIVING IT WITHOUT A LOAD REFERENCE. You will break the engine. Badly.
    • Could be correct. Meter might be that far out. Compare against a known 5 ohm 1% resistor.
    • @Murray_Calavera  If I were an expert I wouldn't be in here looking for assistance.  I am extremely computer literate, have above average understanding on how things should be working and how they should tie together.  If I need to go to a professional tuner so be it, but I'd much rather learn and do things myself even if it means looking for some guidance along the way and blowing up a few engines. @GTSBoy  I was hoping it would be as simple as a large vacuum leak somewhere but I'm unable to find anything, all lines seem to be well capped or going where they need to be, and when removed there is vacuum felt on the tube.  It would be odd for the Haltech built in MAP to be faulty, the GTT tune I imported had it enabled from the start, I incorrectly assumed it was reading a signal from the stock MAP, but that doesn't exist.  After running a vacuum hose to the ECU the signal doesn't change more than 0.2 in either direction.   I'll probably upload a video of my settings tomorrow, as it stands I'm able to daily drive, but getting stuttering when giving it gas from idle, so pulling away from lights is a slow process of revving it up and feathering the clutch until its moving, then it will accelerate fine.  It sounds like I need to get to the bottom of the manifold pressure issue, but the ignition timing section is most intimidating to me and will probably let a pro do that part.  Tomorrow I'll try a different vacuum line to T off of, with any luck I selected one that was already bypassed during the DBW swap.  (edit: I went out and did it right now, the line I had chosen did appear to have no vacuum on it, it used to go to the front of the intake, I've now completely blocked that one off at the bracket that holds several vacuum lines by the firewall.  I T'd into the vacuum line that goes from that bracket to the vacuum pump at the front of the car, but no change in the MAP readings).  Using the new vacuum line that has obvious vacuum on the hose, im still only getting readings between -6.0 and -5.2.  I'm wondering why the ECU was detecting -5.3 when nothing was connected to the MAP nipple and ECU MAP selected as the source. @feartherb26  I do have +T in the works but wanted to wait until Spring to start with that swap since this is my good winter AWD vehicle.  When removing the butterfly, did it leave a bunch of holes in the manifold that you needed to plug?  I thought about removing it but assumed it would be a mess.   I notice no difference when capping the vacuum line to it or letting it do its thing.  This whole thing has convinced me to just get a forward facing manifold when the time comes though.
    • Update: tested my spark plugs that are supposed to be 5ohms with a 10% deviation and one gave me a 0 ohms reading and the rest were 3.9ohm<, so one bad and the others on their way out.
×
×
  • Create New...