Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys i currently have a set of 18's on my car which are in poor condition and was thinking of replacing them. However most of the rims i like are all 17x7/7.5 my current set up is running 18's with 235/40 profile tyres i like how the tyres sit in relation to the guard so what im wanting to know is what set up would have the same overall diameter so they sit and look the same as my current set up (obviously the profile of the tyre will be greater). Also what is the best width to run on s2 stags im not sure how wide my current one's are or what offset they are. Also if i change to 17's would i need to do any speedo corrections?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/276339-wheel-question/
Share on other sites

your post confuses me.. had to read it like 3 times lol

so your'e saying you are going to change to 17's or you want to stay with 18's?

either way, i personally wouldn't run less than an 8.5" wide wheel on a stag, the guards can take it and they are big,heavy, fast cars

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/276339-wheel-question/#findComment-4677849
Share on other sites

1. if you want 17s with the same overall diameter 235/45 will do it - best on 8in but 7.5 will do.

2. If you have the same overall diameter your speedo reading will not change.

3. Take a wheel off and look inside for the actual size and offset (e.g. 8J or 7 1/2 JJ offset 30)

4. Because the front track is narrower than the rear you need a smaller offset number on the front or alternatively use a 25mm spacer on the front.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/276339-wheel-question/#findComment-4678521
Share on other sites

This is interesting as atm I am looking at a new set of tyres. Currently running 225/50R/17 as supplied with the car.

Was looking at the compliancing papers and original specs for a 1996 RSFour.

Documentation states vehicle is an RS FOUR S. Specs detail tyre size front and rear as 205/60R/15. (Yes fifteen). Sticker on door and DOTARS inspection certificate lists size as 225/50R/17 on 7 JJ 17 +40 rims. Yet the rims are 8 JJ 17.

Now the rolling diameter of the 17s must be larger than the 15s. Right?

If Nissan supply car with 17s instead of 15s, do they adjust the speedo to suit? If they dont then it could be the reason I appear to be getting poor economy.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/276339-wheel-question/#findComment-4679296
Share on other sites

rolling diameter must stay the same eg http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html

Ok so assuming im completely noob the diameter is the crucial part so width of rims has no bearing and cannot do any damage to 4wd system or transfer case?. So i can run two diff widths front and rear without fear of damage say 8" front 9" rear is this correct?.And in using this theory why the hell would any 4wd car running 16 or 17" rims be fitted with a tiny ass space saver tyre?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/276339-wheel-question/#findComment-4679342
Share on other sites

ok to help you all with speedo issues, standard tyres fitted to stageas are:

16inch - 205/55/16

17inch - 215/55/17 (rs4s)

these are the factory tyre sizes, there may be some 15s on some cars (possibly non turbo?) but i haven't seen any so i dont know. some stags will have different sizes on their compliance tyre placard but this is only because the tyres were that size at the time of compliance (mine has 225/45/17s, speedo reads 9km/h over what i'm actually doing))

im pretty sure nissan would not have adjusted the speedo to suit the 17s on the manuals so they would just be out from factory.

you need to match the rolling height of the 205/55/16 to make your speedo as accurate as you can, ill check the rolling height and any close matches tomorrow at work and get back to you all.

the other thing you can do is go to jaycar and buy their electronic speedo correction kit. it's just a little circut that intercepts the signal from the speedo and allows you to adjust it. cost about $45 from memory... i'm yet to fit mine but ill let people know how it goes when i do.

as for the attesa question, you must have the same rolling height on the front AND back of your car. there are allowances in the system for tyre wear etc. but from what i've found, they're very small. best to keep same heights all round to prevent any damage to the system or get the closest match you can. ie. i wouldn't allow a difference greater than about 3mm in rolling height.

space savers, allows for bigger fuel tank and more boot space, they are the worst thing ever invented and i hate them. they would match the rolling height of the factory 16s.

you can put different size tyres on them, i haven't looked into that yet but i've been told not to bother by a few of the reps from companies that make them. the prices are insainly high and it's basically not worth it.

D.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/276339-wheel-question/#findComment-4679417
Share on other sites

Hugh I have 17in 235/45 (seems a popular size) and the diameter is slightly bigger than stock but that just seems to make the speedo more, not less accurate - most cars you will notice have speedos that are slightly or sometimes very "optomistic" and the stock Stagea is no exception.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/276339-wheel-question/#findComment-4679850
Share on other sites

ok to help you all with speedo issues, standard tyres fitted to stageas are:

16inch - 205/55/16

17inch - 215/55/17 (rs4s)

these are the factory tyre sizes, there may be some 15s on some cars (possibly non turbo?) but i haven't seen any so i dont know. some stags will have different sizes on their compliance tyre placard but this is only because the tyres were that size at the time of compliance (mine has 225/45/17s, speedo reads 9km/h over what i'm actually doing))

im pretty sure nissan would not have adjusted the speedo to suit the 17s on the manuals so they would just be out from factory.

you need to match the rolling height of the 205/55/16 to make your speedo as accurate as you can, ill check the rolling height and any close matches tomorrow at work and get back to you all.

the other thing you can do is go to jaycar and buy their electronic speedo correction kit. it's just a little circut that intercepts the signal from the speedo and allows you to adjust it. cost about $45 from memory... i'm yet to fit mine but ill let people know how it goes when i do.

as for the attesa question, you must have the same rolling height on the front AND back of your car. there are allowances in the system for tyre wear etc. but from what i've found, they're very small. best to keep same heights all round to prevent any damage to the system or get the closest match you can. ie. i wouldn't allow a difference greater than about 3mm in rolling height.

space savers, allows for bigger fuel tank and more boot space, they are the worst thing ever invented and i hate them. they would match the rolling height of the factory 16s.

you can put different size tyres on them, i haven't looked into that yet but i've been told not to bother by a few of the reps from companies that make them. the prices are insainly high and it's basically not worth it.

D.

Dave I am very interested in the jaycar speedo correcter. They are supposed to have a large range of correction and I think it could be the basis for our 320km/hr speedo - i.e the jaycar unit plus a new scale printed on sticky paper to stick on the stock speedo face??!! (Of course you could do 300 or 280 etc but there would be economy of scale in printing just one and 320 should suit everybody).
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/276339-wheel-question/#findComment-4679851
Share on other sites

Dave I am very interested in the jaycar speedo correcter. They are supposed to have a large range of correction and I think it could be the basis for our 320km/hr speedo - i.e the jaycar unit plus a new scale printed on sticky paper to stick on the stock speedo face??!! (Of course you could do 300 or 280 etc but there would be economy of scale in printing just one and 320 should suit everybody).

yeh it could be used for that i spose... i'm not sure if it works by adjusting the signal at set points/speeds that you set (like 80, 100km/h etc.) or weather it just adjusts it all the way thru the speed curve which is what you'd want if you were changing the dials. if it does, sweet, problem solved! if not then i guess you'd have to set corrections at say 5 or 10km/h incriments to make it accurate but even then it would be slightly off unless you were sitting on one of your set speeds. i'd also be worried about it not correcting the speed until you were doing on of the set correction speeds... say you set it to correct at 80km/h and your speedo was normally over reading by 5km/h. if you were sitting on 79 on your speedo, you'd really be doing 84... so would it start correcting only when you hit 80? if that's how it works then that could be a problem... i hope that all makes sense....

Was surprised. Put an R30 wheel, 205/60/15 against the 225/50/17 and there is SFA difference in dia.

visually, yes. they would look about the same. technically, no. they are about an inch different in diametre. use the link above to check the difference. another thing to consider is that different sizes of tyres will sit differently when under the weight of the car. if i remember tomorrow ill bring home my tyre bible from work and if anyone wants to know rolling heights or anything, i should be able to help.

D.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/276339-wheel-question/#findComment-4681227
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...