Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

well i worked out if i made 270.9awkw @ 6800rpm;

theoretically @ 8500rpm it will make 338.62awkw (if i use the formula of 39.84awkw per 1000rpm).

before anyone rips me apart, i know that the power level is not consistent across every 1000rpm & the power may even drop off higher in the rpm hence this is just an average number & 'guesstimate'

...this is calculated @ 10psi with cams @ 0degrees.

with more than double the boost & tuned cams it 'should' piss in over 400awkw :P

now where's that flux capacity & white coat!

Seems like you've already got them on marko :blink:

  • Replies 477
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi guys,

I had the car tuned yesterday @ CRD :banana:

Refer to attached graph, it made 405awkw @ 23psi with 930nm of torque (to put this into perspective, my previous rb26 on the same dyno & turbo's made 750nm)!

I asked jim what this equates to rwkw, he said about 445rwkw.

Rev limit is set at 9000rpm as jim stated that the engine just wants to keep revving, the above figures are based on 8500rpm (who said rb30's don't rev?)...reason for this, he wants me to avoid touching the limiter as he said its not the best thing for the engine.

It drives like an absolute weapon & what a difference the extra capacity makes, it really is phenomenal & to be honest I haven’t seen jim so excited about any of my past tunes & setups, he is a strong advocate of the rb30.

His words:

"you have the best combo for the street, the average torque increase is HUGE & will feel like an rb26 with 480awkw"

"wait till you drive it, it will be completely different to any gtr"

Something else he mentioned which I noticed was that the car was squirming from left/right on the dyno, the reason is due to torque steer which he has only seen on 1 other gtr with an OS Giken 3.0ltr with T51R & made 480awkw.

Jim wanted to go to 24psi but my actuators wouldn’t allow this as they are set @ 0.7bar, he suggested at this boost level it will make 415awkw.

currently @ 23psi he said it is very safe for hot days & has purposely ran it a bit richer.

My next step (if I want more power) is to run E85, upgrade to 1600cc injectors & run 1.2-1.5bar actuators. This will give me an average gain of 50awkw (i.e. over 450awkw)

He was very happy with the results considering the engine ran stock valves, intake plenum & throttle bodies.

He was very impressed with the way the engine performed on the dyno - all Kudo's to Greg @ ProEngines, thanks mate!

post-8728-1247788866_thumb.jpg

Edited by Marko R1

Nice result mate!

Always good to see a project end up with such a great result

You've inspired me to move $1k out of my "Holiday" fund into my "RB30" fund

She looks like she pulls nice and hard up top, what size Kelfords did you use?

Hi guys,

I had the car tuned yesterday @ CRD :P

Refer to attached graph, it made 405awkw @ 23psi with 930nm of torque (to put this into perspective, my previous rb26 on the same dyno & turbo's made 750nm)!

I asked jim what this equates to rwkw, he said about 445rwkw.

Rev limit is set at 9000rpm as jim stated that the engine just wants to keep revving, the above figures are based on 8500rpm (who said rb30's don't rev?)...reason for this, he wants me to avoid touching the limiter as he said its not the best thing for the engine.

It drives like an absolute weapon & what a difference the extra capacity makes, it really is phenomenal & to be honest I haven’t seen jim so excited about any of my past tunes & setups, he is a strong advocate of the rb30.

His words:

"you have the best combo for the street, the average torque increase is HUGE & will feel like an rb26 with 480awkw"

"wait till you drive it, it will be completely different to any gtr"

Something else he mentioned which I noticed was that the car was squirming from left/right on the dyno, the reason is due to torque steer which he has only seen on 1 other gtr with an OS Giken 3.0ltr with T51R & made 480awkw.

Jim wanted to go to 24psi but my actuators wouldn’t allow this as they are set @ 0.7bar, he suggested at this boost level it will make 415awkw.

currently @ 23psi he said it is very safe for hot days & has purposely ran it a bit richer.

My next step (if I want more power) is to run E85, upgrade to 1600cc injectors & run 1.2-1.5bar actuators. This will give me an average gain of 50awkw (i.e. over 450awkw)

He was very happy with the results considering the engine ran stock valves, intake plenum & throttle bodies.

He was very impressed with the way the engine performed on the dyno - all Kudo's to Greg @ ProEngines, thanks mate!

Nice result, well done, that's a strong one Greg. What's the scale along the bottom of the dyno graph? RPM (1K to 10K) or KPH (0 to 200)? The 405 4wkw is around 675 bhp, so there should be plenty left in the 1000 cc injectors? Are you sure it will be necessary to go to 1600 cc's for E85? After all there is plenty of flow and pressure available from 2 x 044's, so lifting the fuel pressure is a no cost option if required.

Cheers

Gary

if anyone is contemplating on building an rb26/30 - just do it!

these gtr's were born to carry these torque monsters.

Mmm i seem to recall someone saying that (and a lot more) to you in a pub about a year ago....

thats what i thought greg :( more bling!

i was waiting for my 'gay request' to bite me on ass lol

I have to admit Marko, you're the first person I've done an engine for that's sent me an email saying "I know this may seem like a gay request..." I'm pretty accommodating but there are limits... :P

Nice result, well done, that's a strong one Greg. What's the scale along the bottom of the dyno graph? RPM (1K to 10K) or KPH (0 to 200)? The 405 4wkw is around 675 bhp, so there should be plenty left in the 1000 cc injectors? Are you sure it will be necessary to go to 1600 cc's for E85? After all there is plenty of flow and pressure available from 2 x 044's, so lifting the fuel pressure is a no cost option if required.

Cheers

Gary

hey gary - the scale along the bottom is kph (0-200).

the fuel system is up to the task for e85, however, the 1000cc are @ 90% injector duty...e85 requires 30% more fuel & if i gain 50awkw i definitely need 1600s

I have to admit Marko, you're the first person I've done an engine for that's sent me an email saying "I know this may seem like a gay request..." I'm pretty accommodating but there are limits... :down:

well greg...u have given me as you quoted "a nice fat curve" (dont worry guys, im married)

hey gary - the scale along the bottom is kph (0-200).

the fuel system is up to the task for e85, however, the 1000cc are @ 90% injector duty...e85 requires 30% more fuel & if i gain 50awkw i definitely need 1600s

are you serious? :down: theres gotta be something funky going on there somewhere caus it doesnt make sence. whats rail pressure set at?

I agree, 1000's should only be running at about 70% to make 400rwkw

forget the power levels guys...its torque that eats injector duty.

example...my old engine with 700cc jobbies could muster 450+ with headroom...new set-up with more torque had them maxed out at 450. The difference between the two engines was the completely different torque curve, one looked like a mountain peak...the other was flat and wide.

running indy blues at a reasonable duty cycle is a lot more sensible than trying to push the 1000's by upping the base on them.

Edited by DiRTgarage
forget the power levels guys...its torque that eats injector duty.

example...my old engine with 700cc jobbies could muster 450+ with headroom...new set-up with more torque had them maxed out at 450. The difference between the two engines was the completely different torque curve, one looked like a mountain peak...the other was flat and wide.

running indy blues at a reasonable duty cycle is a lot more sensible than trying to push the 1000's by upping the base on them.

well its about time somebody explained this on the thread & it actually makes sense, thanks TW.00.GL!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • To follow up a question from earlier too since I had the front bar off again (fking!) This is what is between the bumper and the drivers side wheel And this is the navigator side, only one thing but its a biggy! So basically....no putting coolers in the wheel arches without a lot of moving other stuff. Assuming I move to properly race prepping this car I'll take that job on and see how the computers respond to removing a whole bunch of ADAS modules
    • So I prepped the car for another track day on Wednesday (will be interesting to see coolant temps post flushing out and the larger reservoir, with a forecast of 3-14 being 20o cooler than last time I took it out). Couple of things to mention; since I am just driving the car and not taking a support vehicle, I took the rear seats out and just loaded the back up Team Trackday style. Look at all that space! To cover off removing the rear seat....it is weird (note the hybrid is probably different because it wouldn't have folding rear seats) Basically, you remove the lower seat base, very similar to a r series but it is a clip that pulls forward to release the base rather than it being bolted down. Easy Then, you need to remove the side section of the rear seat on each side. There is a 14mm head nut at the bottom of the side piece, the it slides upwards off a hook at the top to release; you also need to unhook the seatbelt from the loop at the top. Then the centre piece is weird. You need to release/fold the seats forward with the tab in the boot on each side From there, there are 2,x12mm headed bolts holding the rear of each seat to the folding bracket, under the trim between the rear seat and the boot (4x christmas tree clips there, they suck). The seat is out but you can see where the bolts attach to the bracket
    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
×
×
  • Create New...