Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 477
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

OK, my original post wasn't that far out.

It's in 4th gear (1 to 1) which is around 29 kph per 1000 rpm with a 4.1 diff ratio.

The scale is slightly different as the original post said 0 to 200 kph scale when in fact it's 0 to 220 kph

Maximum torque is at ~138 kph, that's 138 / 29 = 4,750 rpm

Maximum horsepower is at ~180 kph, that's 180 / 29 = 6,250 rpm

The big miss on my behalf was that it has 80 rwkw at 3,000 rpm, 87 kph which is 87 / 29 = 3,000 rpm

As the big man once said "Two out three ain't bad".

Cheers

Gary

Thanks for the clearer pics Marko.

Here is mine on pump fuel with the Greddy T618Z and power fc before I got a vipec from an authorised dealer in Brisbane :)

GTRwithpumpfuel3.jpg

The car was tuned for Boost 98 (10% Ethanol fuel) but had pump 98 fuel at the time of the dyno run so it was a bit down on power/response.

The dyno day was near my house so I just came around to give them some support, it's really a circuit/drag car and not a dyno queen so I wasn't meant to be there anyhow lol

Anyway, if you ignore the actual numbers and just look at the power curve, it looks like your turbo is more responsive but the T618z breath better up top.

Your power curve reminds me of what mine felt like when I had the t517z with the 3L. The torque with the T517z reminds me of a turbo GT2. Sudden thump in the low to midrange and not much at 7-8.5krpm.

Your setup will be quite fast on the circuit.

Dirtgarage, if you have a dyno printout with your HKS GTRS on pump fuel, could you post for some comparision?

I think it would be unfair to post the dyno printout with race fuel because all of the extra response are from timing advance.

Dirtgarage, if you have a dyno printout with your HKS GTRS on pump fuel, could you post for some comparision?

I think it would be unfair to post the dyno printout with race fuel because all of the extra response are from timing advance.

I may upset Steve-o if i put up my graph...ive got a better one to post...its pump...2530's...basic Nissan engine...home built...stock plenum...260 cams...no tricks...at 25psi...Mobil Synergy 8000. Its a good comparo as its same dyno/tuner etc.

ill put it up if Marko wants to see it...its his thread.

9K the one you would like to see is the one from Autosalon with the GT-RS's... it was the day after i ran my engine in...was a basic CRD run-in tune...again pump fuel but this time BP98...only 20psi of boost. Its not really fair to compare a race engine to Marko's...it made 460 something the night before at CRD both Marko's and my curves could be overlayed from CRD's dyno computer and printed off but...even Jim told him not to compare the two when he was getting tuned. Ill see again what Marko says.

Edited by DiRTgarage

Sorry it's not the best image but that is all I can do without a working scanner thanks to Window Vista lol

Wrongfuel23psi.jpg

and below is what I meant with the small turbo + 3L RB and the 996 GT2 comparison

2_20071004133821.jpg

Your setup has way more power and will be very good for the circuit......now go and eat some Porschessss :D

as if i would mind paul :D

here tis...

see two posts below...

you must remember this was run-in @ 20psi only, the torque increased and came in earlier once it was properly tuned with more timing a much less fuel...I don't ask Jim to print off graphs for me as it means 3/5ths of fu(k all when lined up at the track so you will have to put up with the Autosalon ones.

Edited by DiRTgarage
how did you derive 29kph per 1000rpm?

I punched it into my gear ratio chart that we use for selecting diff and gearbox ratios for each circuit. The formula is pretty simple as 4th gear is 1 to 1;

Three common tyre sizes for a GTR, 235/45/17 is 512 revolutions per kilometer, 255/40/17 is 515 revolutions per kilometer and 265/35/18 is 512 revolutions per kilometer.

1000 engine revolutions per minute / 4.1 diff ratio = 244 wheel revolutions per minute

244 wheels revolutions per minute x 60 minutes in an hour = 14640 wheel revolutions per hour

14640 wheel revolutions per hour / 515 revolutions per kilometer (for 255/40/17) = 28.4 kph per 1000 engine rpm

14640 wheel revolutions per hour / 512 revolutions per kilometer (for 265/35/18 and 235/45/17) = 28.6 kph per 1000 engine rpm

There is a bit of tyre diameter growth due to centrifigal force, so 29 kph per 1000 engine rpm is close enough for this exercise.

If you have a different sized tyre it can make a difference, obviously, but even a 225/50/16 is 519 revolution per kilomete so not a big deal . The above assumes a half worn tyre, say 5 mm of tread left at 30 psi. A new tyre slightly less rpm per kilometer, a worn out tyre slightly more. Obviously when we are setting up a race car we measure each tyre's circumference as we need to feed that into the data logger.

Check it for yourself, 3,000 rpm is my normal test in 4th gear, so it should be 3 x 29 = 87 kph, plus around 4% for speedo error, so your speedo should show around 90 kph.

Cheers

Gary

got a better one to post...its pump...2530's...basic Nissan engine...home built...stock plenum...260 cams...no tricks...at 25psi...Mobil Synergy 8000. Its a good comparo as its same dyno/tuner etc.
it's interesting though that the 3 litre doesn't make the GT-RS turbos as responsive as people make out.

I've had the opinion for a long time that GT-RS's are OK in single configuration on an RB25 but in twin form they are too laggy for my tastes, even on an RB30. The best RB26 I ever drove had a pair of 2530's on it and it did everything just the way I like it. Paul's remarkable results with 2530's even exceeded my expectations. Next year (I think I said that last year) I am going to try a VQ35 with GT-RS's, maybe the extra 500 cc's will make the difference.

Cheers

Gary

Paul, is that at 20psi?

yep...we weren't pushing it as the engine was only fired up 2 days earlier and we were already almost 100kw ahead in the dyno challenge. I didn't see the point of flogging the car on the dyno to please the ricer fans and show car owners set-up next to the dyno cell were whinging about the raw fuel the car was showering them with. The day earlier during the qualifying runs it made 355KW at 11psi...this shocked Todd from Mainline, he looked at me in the car and said..."its only making 11psi mate...is something wrong...i laughed and said not at all, we will come back tomm. and roll 600 with 20psi" (600hp) and we did.

Autosalon don't like exceeding 200km/h on the dyno due to some insurance restraints...every now and then they do. It actually makes no differenceon their dyno whether its 3rd gear or 4th...ill show you something that may dispell another myth if you like. Again if thats ok with you Marko.

Gary would love to see the RS powered VQ...what an engine that would be.

Edited by DiRTgarage

Have you got a power curve with race fuel and full boost then Paul?

Well if it was done in 3rd then you get the impression that it's more responsive at certain speed on the x-axis.

It's like saying your car pull as hard in third gear as Marko in 4th.

I also notice that both your and Mark rpm limits are at 9k rpm and my is only at 8.5k rpm but my dyno speed is a bit higher.

Could someone with more experience explain that? Dyno speedo error?

Edited by 9krpm
I've had the opinion for a long time that GT-RS's are OK in single configuration on an RB25 but in twin form they are too laggy for my tastes, even on an RB30.

Next year (I think I said that last year) I am going to try a VQ35 with GT-RS's, maybe the extra 500 cc's will make the difference.

Cheers

Gary

all this dyno mumbo means sfa, i honestly think if u went for a drive in my car u would change ur mind

u have my attention

ok 4th gear

scan0001dri.jpg

the next day we wanted over 500KW so we changed the last two percentages in the AFM table so it made slighty more power in the top end by running slightly leaner...other than that essentially the same tune. If we didn't touch it it would have made the same power as the 4th gear run, although in my opinion the strapping of the car on the 3rd gear run was also better as the car rode up higher on the roller.

scan0002qgr.jpg

these runs are 25psi

it seems pretty much the same result is achieved on a Mainline dyno whether its in 3rd or 4th.

a few years earlier we did back to back runs in 4WD and 2WD...the difference was 2kw. These Mainline units are clever...you cannot fool them...they read very accurately.

Edited by DiRTgarage
u have my attention

My impression is that if rpm is on the x-axis then it doesnt matter what gear it is in.

However if the x-axis is speed then everything that produces "speed" from "rpm" matters (eg gear ratio, diff ratio) and should be adjusted before comparison.

To be honest, I am in the same boat as Marko. I've never driven anything with a rb26 that is as impressive as the RB30.

The worst one I've driven is an rb30 with a pair of TD06. It wanted to do 180 every time it comes on boost.

Sorry I did not see the second graph when I posted...so I will edit this post.

As you can see there is a subtle difference between the 2 graphs. The power curves looks exactly the same.

However when you analyse the power at specific speed, the dyno run in lower gear always give higher reading.

Dyno operators should print out rpm vs power/torque rather than speed for ease of comparison.

Edited by 9krpm

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Seat of the pants assessment of the new intake: The car is way less "doughy" when hitting the loud pedal, especially off idle when stopped or in traffic, I did use a cheapo lazer thermal thingo to measure the temp around where the pod filter got its air, it was between 55 - 60°C, in saying this the car was shut off and not moving, so the OEM intake pipe was not supplying any fresh air to where the pod was when the car was at least moving A weird bonus was induction noise on the throttle in the cabin increased a bit,  I was worried that I was actually going to lose some of that induction noise I love so much, outside though, when I got the daughter to do a WOT drive by pass for me, the induction noise has increased alot when on the throttle, not quite ITB doort, but well up there I'm extremely happy with the results and have been exploring the country roads in the region  As for house mods: 1.New front fence is up and is awesome, it really upgraded how the joint looks from the street, and the added security is nice 2. Electricians have replace some interior lights, and with more lighting in the garage, a few new motion detecting lights out the front above the garage, front room, and at the front door, which I have already found heaps helpful coming and going, also now has fancy pants CCTV all round the house The only hold point for power though is the solar and batteries due to supply issues, although this will happen over the next few weeks 3. I have done a heap of landscaping out the front and I'm almost ready to do a new small retaining wall with some nice blocks to replace the brick and cemented in rocks around the raised garden beds cemented in river stone "was the fashion at the time" the house was built. I currently have a pallet of retaining wall blocks and 2 bulka bags of 20mm blue metal to replace the wood chip that is in the raised garden beds around the house 4. I now have 3 big raised garden beds for out the back to grow some vegetables, about 70cm high, 200cm long and 100cm wide 5. My 2 compost bins are already pretty full with brown, green and kitchen waste from the landscaping I'vedone so far, but they will probably take a few months to break down, so anything else that gets chopped, trimmed, and kitchen waste will just start filling the base of the raised garden beds to about 30cm before I start throwing 40cm of good compost, and stuff, for the vegetables to grow in, I'll need a few ton of compost and soil, but the local supplier can sent me bulka bags of the stuff Basically the logs, wood chips and a few strategically placed rocks for drainage, will give the beds some good organic materials down low to break down over time, and they will hold moisture during the warmer months to save the water in my big arse water tank if we don't get alot of rain So, all in all, the car and house mods are going well, and I'm really enjoying being retired, I sleep in too 0700 and slowly plod around inside until I feel like actually doing anything, and only work in the yard for as long as want, which has actually been alot over the last few weeks,  although when you look at it, it seems that not a huge amount of work has been done,  until I look at the before I started the work pics Happy days and good times indeed 
    • hahaha yeah. Plan is to get side skirts and probably just rear pods. But going to do them one-by-one. I've got a set that I really like from RHDJapen, but that one isn't shipped to AU. So need to find someone who can get it for me
    • Here's an idea, answer the questions I asked you as they are trying to work out WHY the LSD will be binding up in a straight line.
    • You haven't driven many modern cars then have you? Most of them have sfa steering feel with their stupid electric bullshit steering systems.
×
×
  • Create New...