Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 152
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1989 Liberty Wagon...

30k old 2.5 bottom end balanced to within a gram

2.2 heads, ported with big cams

K&N, Hitech 2.5 with one straight through muffler

30k old Forester gearbox, with Liberty Diffs

'04 WRX struts, lowered

'04 WRX Leather Momo

Falken Azenis

All in all owes me more than my Stagea did, and not much less than my GTR, looks like a busted arse, sounds like a WRX, with no Turbo, Goes like WRX... with no turbo...

But after 3 attempts at making the motor stay together... VICTORY IS MINE!!!

turns out it is that ugly I have never taken a photo of it.... will get around to it!

Edited by iplen
you still own both cars though right??

Only own the R32 now, had to sell the GT due to loosing my job :) . Not toooo upset though, had nothing but problems with it while I had it. But once financial again I plan to get another daily so I can continue with my R32 project.

this is...well meant to be my daily

IMG_13681.jpg

bought it after a sold my R33. plan was to buy the R34 and keep it as a weekender or going out car and the magna for work and stuff. and that never happened. ended up driving the R34 s a daily and the magna sat at home lol. so gave it to my dad lol

Only own the R32 now, had to sell the GT due to loosing my job :thumbsup: . Not toooo upset though, had nothing but problems with it while I had it. But once financial again I plan to get another daily so I can continue with my R32 project.

was gonna say you'd be half insane to sell your GT for a 32 just for the sake of it.

My daily in the rain = R32 GTR with 2.7lt engine running HKS everything with a pair of GT2871R's hahahah

Otherwise its a 86rwkw gsxr 600 complete with full titanium exhaust, BMC race filter, Modified intake trumpets and PC3r computer with 520chain conversion

hahah :thumbsup:

My 32 was my daily for a couple of years and that included weekend upgrades such as: RB30DET, 25t gearbox, 2-way install etc etc.

When it came time to strap the GT35R on there I figure it wouldn't be done in a weekend so got this for a daily..

010a.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...