Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

What would you say the power limit would be for a Nistune on an Rb25 before you would be to a full replacement ecu like Vipec or others

Power isnt a problem but resolution becomes an issue if you after big HP etc... temp compensations (like AIT on GTR's) are also an issue but we are working on that now with pete from nistune. Mind you im talking 380awkw plus. The quality of the tune with nistune comes down to the available registers or addresses which are adjustable, these are getting updated regularly so it pays to keep an eye on them.

For streeters i just cant get enough of the nistune gear hence why we do quite a few each week, for serious track cars i would loo at something like vipec, link or haltech.

That said if any guru's know how to find the relevant registers hidden in the nissan ecu that are not currently accessible let me know.

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The Nistune "chip" from what I understand just facilitates live programming of the existing hardware inside the ECU's it works with (r32 gtr, z32 etc). These ECU's could always be flashed with new maps, just not on the fly - so you would need to adjust the map, flash the ECU, run on the dyno, flash the map and so on - not very nice.

All the hardware you use to achieve a certain power level - AFM's, injectors, fuel pumps etc all run on pretty standard voltages, so as long as they are within the ranges that the ECU can read or output, there is nothing to say that you can't achieve 2gagillion kilowatts

Where the ViPec and other full replacements come in with is additional features and flexibility. Quite often though this comes with incompatibilities / quirks with standard components - CAS for example as discussed above. ViPec from what I have seen are trying hard to make it as plug and play as possible so kudos to them - no doubt the issue discussed above will be corrected with a software update at some point soon.

I personally really don't like having to chop / splice and add / remove sensors from an engine where a plug and play alternative is available.

really only adding one sensor to the vi-pec if its a GTS-t...and thats air inlet temp. This is something that none of the other two (Nistune and Power FC) have. Air inlet temp correction is important in cars that see track duty...ive known of a car that ran perfectly for quite some time on the street with an ecu with no AIT sensor that melted a piston the first time it saw track duty.

With the GTR no sensors need to be added...just a vacuum/boost line to the ecu.

Both Power FC and Nistune also cannot read trigger like all others at high RPM....its just a case of a disc with 360 slots spinning so fast it blurrs to the point that the ecu see's it as one big open slot. Thats why big horsepower.rpm cars run aftermarket trigger set-up...its to avoid this issue. The Nissan 360deg optical CAS was never designed with big RPM in mind and is simply not up to the task. My car's logging showed on one run that the engine was spinning at 22500rpm...it wasn't doing that of course, more like 10000 but the ecu couldn't work out what rpm because of the trigger wheels speed and gave a false reading.

Edited by Swiper the Fox
The Nistune "chip" from what I understand just facilitates live programming of the existing hardware inside the ECU's it works with (r32 gtr, z32 etc). These ECU's could always be flashed with new maps, just not on the fly - so you would need to adjust the map, flash the ECU, run on the dyno, flash the map and so on - not very nice.

All the hardware you use to achieve a certain power level - AFM's, injectors, fuel pumps etc all run on pretty standard voltages, so as long as they are within the ranges that the ECU can read or output, there is nothing to say that you can't achieve 2gagillion kilowatts

Where the ViPec and other full replacements come in with is additional features and flexibility. Quite often though this comes with incompatibilities / quirks with standard components - CAS for example as discussed above. ViPec from what I have seen are trying hard to make it as plug and play as possible so kudos to them - no doubt the issue discussed above will be corrected with a software update at some point soon.

I personally really don't like having to chop / splice and add / remove sensors from an engine where a plug and play alternative is available.

Nistune is real time tuning, Old daughter board is what you are thinking about.

really only adding one sensor to the vi-pec if its a GTS-t...and thats air inlet temp. This is something that none of the other two (Nistune and Power FC) have. Air inlet temp correction is important in cars that see track duty...ive known of a car that ran perfectly for quite some time on the street with an ecu with no AIT sensor that melted a piston the first time it saw track duty.

Right - yeah I have always wondered how relevant AIT was with tuning. I installed a Microtech LT8 on one of my old ET pulsars, added an AIT sensor but never needed to add any correction as inlet temps never got too out of control despite the relatively huge amount of boost I was running.

Both Power FC and Nistune also cannot read trigger like all others at high RPM....its just a case of a disc with 360 slots spinning so fast it blurrs to the point that the ecu see's it as one big open slot. Thats why big horsepower.rpm cars run aftermarket trigger set-up...its to avoid this issue. The Nissan 360deg optical CAS was never designed with big RPM in mind and is simply not up to the task. My car's logging showed on one run that the engine was spinning at 22500rpm...it wasn't doing that of course, more like 10000 but the ecu couldn't work out what rpm because of the trigger wheels speed and gave a false reading.

Right so does the standard GTR CAS just contain an 360 optical trigger disc & photo diode?

What is different about the chopper disc - 6 slot? (edit; just looked it up yeah cool - simlar to what the pulsar had a slot for each cylinder inside the dizzy)

Nistune is real time tuning, Old daughter board is what you are thinking about.

Sorry I thought that is what I said?

"facilitates live programming of the existing hardware" and "These ECU's could always be flashed with new maps, just not on the fly"

Is it something different altogether - i.e. complete replacement for some of the existing ECU hardware?

  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even more fun, leave all the ADAS stuff plugged in, but in different locations, hopefully avoid any codes!   And honestly, all these new cars with their weird electronics. Pull all the electronics out Duncan, and just shove an aftermarket ECU and if needed a trans controller in, along with a PDM. Make it run basic but race car styled!
    • To follow up a question from earlier too since I had the front bar off again (fking!) This is what is between the bumper and the drivers side wheel And this is the navigator side, only one thing but its a biggy! So basically....no putting coolers in the wheel arches without a lot of moving other stuff. Assuming I move to properly race prepping this car I'll take that job on and see how the computers respond to removing a whole bunch of ADAS modules
    • So I prepped the car for another track day on Wednesday (will be interesting to see coolant temps post flushing out and the larger reservoir, with a forecast of 3-14 being 20o cooler than last time I took it out). Couple of things to mention; since I am just driving the car and not taking a support vehicle, I took the rear seats out and just loaded the back up Team Trackday style. Look at all that space! To cover off removing the rear seat....it is weird (note the hybrid is probably different because it wouldn't have folding rear seats) Basically, you remove the lower seat base, very similar to a r series but it is a clip that pulls forward to release the base rather than it being bolted down. Easy Then, you need to remove the side section of the rear seat on each side. There is a 14mm head nut at the bottom of the side piece, the it slides upwards off a hook at the top to release; you also need to unhook the seatbelt from the loop at the top. Then the centre piece is weird. You need to release/fold the seats forward with the tab in the boot on each side From there, there are 2,x12mm headed bolts holding the rear of each seat to the folding bracket, under the trim between the rear seat and the boot (4x christmas tree clips there, they suck). The seat is out but you can see where the bolts attach to the bracket
    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
×
×
  • Create New...