Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys, my tuner disconnected the o2 sensor whilst tuning and forgot to connect it back after he was done with it.

I have since connected it back up and now the car idles funny when warm & backfires alot.

Would this have caused any issues because he tuned it when the o2 sensor was disconnected or would it be a totally unrelated problem ?

He also tuned it without a bov (blocked it off) but i got a GTR bov on there atm but i dont have the correct plumb back pipe so he blocked it, after i plumb it all up and get it running, would this affect the tune/cars drivebility & idle in anyway?

any help much appreciatyed.

Cheers

What ECU are you using?

you should be always tuning with the O2 switched off!

if its a powerFC, go into the settings menu, and disable it see how you go, if not enable it if it's disabled see how you go

i believe that the O2 sensor only trims the mixtures at cruise.

when tuning you turn the sensor off or you could unplug it. this allows the computer to not trim the mixtures and you get a true readout of what air fuel ratio you have.

but when youre under load the O2 sensor does nothing.

i am not running any at the moment in my GTR, still waiting on Nissan to get some in. the car runs fine, chews through a little more fuel than it should when cruising but other than that no difference.

its normal to turn off 02 feedback during tuning

but it should be re-enabled, the powerfc faq in my sig covers how to enable and check it

the blocked bov would make it stall and run like ass, fix that

im running a emanage ultimate.

oh ok fair enough, well its strange how the car idles funny when warm after connecting the 02 back up lol

ill get the bov sorted this weekend and see how it goes.

thanks guys :D

you cant turn feedback off with the ultimate so he may have tuned "around" it, leave it disconnected and run a tank through the car if your economy is fine leave it disconnected. I have on occasions had to do the same thing when a crook 02 sensor keeps 'pulling' the mixtures out of whack.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • LOL.... a good amount of people (not all) on that continent seem to know everything and like to measure things in bananas, football fields, statue of liberties instead of the metric system lol.
    • I assume the modules are similar enough, so if you've had no issues I don't see why I would. I have tried to find a wiring diagram for the FPCM / fuel pump circuit, but I can't find it anywhere. Otherwise, I would just do some wire cutting and joining at the FPCM and give the 12 V supplied to the FPCM directly to the pump instead. If you know anyone that could help with wiring diagrams, I'd be very happy  
    • If it dies, then bypass. The task isn't difficult. I have one running on a standard R32 FPCM. That's after nearly 20 years of it running an 040, which pull substantially more current than the Walbro. They're not the same module, but I'd hope it indicates that the R33 one should be man enough for the job. I think people kill them when putting proper sized pumps on them, not these little toy pumps we're talking about here.
    • Silicone spray won't hurt anything. And if it does, that's an opportunity to put some solid steel spherical bushings in, so you can really learn what suspension noise sounds like, If you're going to try it, just spray one bush at a time, so you can work out which one is actually noisy. My best guess is that if the noise started only since putting the coilovers in, then it is just noise being transmitted up through the top mounts of the struts, and not necessarily "new" noise from bushes. But it's almost impossible to know.
    • Are you saying the 34 is SUV height, and not that we're talking about an SUV here? (because if we're talking about an SUV, you don't fix them. You just replace them when something breaks. Not worth establishing sufficient emotional connection with an SUV to warrant doing any work on one). I wouldn't jack my car up on a short little loop of 10mm steel rod poking out through a hole in the bumper bar, front or rear end. I realise that we're probably not talking about that type of loop at the front, being the one under/behind the bar on a Skyline.... but even for that one, trying to jack up on what amounts to a thin piece of steel, designed purely for withstanding a horizontal tension force, not a vertical compressive force (and so would be prone to buckling/crushing) and, my most particular bitch about it - located RIGHT AT THE EXTREME FRONT OF THE CAR, applying a load up through the radiator support panel, etc, with almost the entire mass of the car cantilevered between there and the rear wheels? Nope. Not doing that. Not on the regular. That structure out there in front of the front crossmember is not designed to carry load in the vertical direction. Not really designed to carry any load at all, really. The chassis rail that the tow point is connected to would be fine loaded in tension, as per towing. Not intended to carry the mass of the whole car, especially loaded all on one rail, with twisting and all sorts of shitty load distribution going on. No, I will happily drive up on some pieces of wood, thanks. That can only happen on driven wheels, and they are at the other end of the car, and this problem does not exist at that end of the car. And even then, I have been known to drive up on at least 1x piece of 2x8 each side at the rear, simply to reduce the amount of jack pumping necessary to get the car up high enough for the jack stands. What really really shits me about Skylines is the lack of decent places for chassis stands at either end of the car. You'd think they'd be designed into the crossmembers.
×
×
  • Create New...