Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

performance wise would the PM35 stag , keep up with the nm series turbo stag , i know power delivery would be different , but how much so ? :(

I guess as it is the VQ35DE it would have performance similar to a V35 but with a heavier body.

From what I have read the V35 coupe is doing about a 6.7-6.9 0-100 and the M35 is meant to be about 6.5 - 6.7 0-100.

So I would imagine it would be a tad slower than the Vq25DET.

I also saw today that the 2WD version of the PM35 has a slightly higher diff ration than that of the 4WD version. I guess this is because it would be putting a little more power to the driving wheels (2 only) than the 4WD equivalent.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/282150-pm35s/#findComment-4751807
Share on other sites

I guess as it is the VQ35DE it would have performance similar to a V35 but with a heavier body.

From what I have read the V35 coupe is doing about a 6.7-6.9 0-100 and the M35 is meant to be about 6.5 - 6.7 0-100.

So I would imagine it would be a tad slower than the Vq25DET.

I also saw today that the 2WD version of the PM35 has a slightly higher diff ration than that of the 4WD version. I guess this is because it would be putting a little more power to the driving wheels (2 only) than the 4WD equivalent.

cheers, that rests my case . stick with the nm35 , unless i can come up with the money to turbo the pm35 :( $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/282150-pm35s/#findComment-4752802
Share on other sites

Don't bag a PM35 unless you've driven one. I initially had my doubts as well but after driving one for 20 minutes, I was truly hooked.

Imo I reckon a PM35 2WD will go as good, if not better than a 4WD NM35. The gearbox is also improved as well in the later models so manual shifting feels a lot more crisp and responds better than the older NM35's.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/282150-pm35s/#findComment-4752867
Share on other sites

Don't bag a PM35 unless you've driven one. I initially had my doubts as well but after driving one for 20 minutes, I was truly hooked.

Imo I reckon a PM35 2WD will go as good, if not better than a 4WD NM35. The gearbox is also improved as well in the later models so manual shifting feels a lot more crisp and responds better than the older NM35's.

i'd love the current version , but i'd like awd, and i think the awd pm35 might be a bit sluggish, with the extra weight , but then again haven't driven so im being ignorant, might have to see if i can organise a side by side driving test , once compliance is finished with the pm35.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/282150-pm35s/#findComment-4752950
Share on other sites

The power delivery would be completely different. The NM35 has higher PEAK power and torque but I'd be willing to bet the PM35 has significantly more power and torque up to say 2200-ish rpm, possibly higher.

Dont just look at the power figures on paper, thats just the maximums. If they could quote you "average" torque figures, or if you could get hold of a dyno graph of each (showing power and torque), that might make it easier to compare.

This means that driving around town the PM35 would have a fair amount of get-up-and-go, more so than the turbo model. One extra Litre ought to make quite a difference to low-end torque.

The power delivery would be much more linear in the PM35. but no turbo, no fun - I say, although if you're not into turbos then this isn't likely to matter one bit.

The PM35 would also be better on fuel too. There are many things in its favour...but I'd miss the turbo. :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/282150-pm35s/#findComment-4753128
Share on other sites

The PM35 would also be better on fuel too. There are many things in its favour...but I'd miss the turbo. :P

You would think so... Official numbers state that the VQ35DE powered PM35 is worse on fuel than the VQ25DET powered NM35.

PM35 (VQ35DE) - 8.2km/L = 12.1L/100kms

NM35 (VQ25DET) - 8.9km/L = 11.1L/100kms

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/282150-pm35s/#findComment-4753143
Share on other sites

You would think so... Official numbers state that the VQ35DE powered PM35 is worse on fuel than the VQ25DET powered NM35.

PM35 (VQ35DE) - 8.2km/L = 12.1L/100kms

NM35 (VQ25DET) - 8.9km/L = 11.1L/100kms

That's could just be the Nissan factory tunes getting worse and worse!

Most people I've spoken to who have been dynoing Nissan vehicles (including imports) have said most of the models just run way too rich, they mainly put it down to bad tuning. Who know's, maybe the fuel companies have a handshake agreement with Nissan :down:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/282150-pm35s/#findComment-4753587
Share on other sites

That's could just be the Nissan factory tunes getting worse and worse!

Most people I've spoken to who have been dynoing Nissan vehicles (including imports) have said most of the models just run way too rich, they mainly put it down to bad tuning. Who know's, maybe the fuel companies have a handshake agreement with Nissan ;)

So a tuner thinks that Nissan make a bad tune for a car they build from the ground up, meaning the tuner can do better?

Being that Nissan program the ECU from scratch to have the car appeal to wide audience (more sales), with high reliability...

That is probably not a statement the tuner can back up.

Having said that, I will be in line (eventually) to have my ECU re-mapped.

It's not really bad tuning. The cars run rich so that it reduces the chances of an engine failure.
:)

That's what I heard as well.. Better to be too rich and use a bit more fuel than the lean out and grenade the engine...

:stupid: 's

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/282150-pm35s/#findComment-4754330
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...