Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

What: 1992 R32 Gtst (Manual)

Where: Brisbane

How Much: $7250ono

Info:

1992 R32 Gtst – Manual, factory turbo – Originally auto but has been converted at some stage throughout its life. Has been fitted with a high flow turbo using rb25 housings (see turbo photos for housing numbers).

I have spent a great deal of time tracking down factory recirc lines, air box, bov ect. Everything is now back to factory – No idle issues that skylines suffer when this has been removed, no idle drop pulling up to traffic lights ect. Air con (everything) has been removed, still has a working heater.

AFM has been replaced (receipts provided to buyer).

3inch cat back exhaust and a GFB T Peace boost controller (currently still on stock) and a huge thermo fan – Performance wise everything else is as per factory.

Basic Tein coilovers, they are what they are, Option1 90% shimmed diff, Option1 caster rods, R33 Gtst rims with 80% tread left. Sound system is what you would call basic.. No rear speakers, aftermarket door speakers of some kind, plus a basic MP3 player head unit.

I have not washed or cleaned this car in nearly 5 months, nor do I plan to for inspections. This R32 is what it is. It is not a show car, it is un-tidy. It has been a daily driver that gets thrown around from time to time. In saying that the car is uber reliable and cracks a mean flame :happy:

Bad points:

Who knows what the true kays are. The cluster has been changed – it reads 45,000kms, which is obviously so far from the truth it’s not funny. Steering wheel is a wrecker replacement, wear is not indicative of true kays, however general condition of the car would suggest over 150,000kms

Some clown at one stage made an attempt to break into the car via the sunroof, the mounting pegs (little legs from roof glass to rail) were broken. Although the sunroof could still be operational, as the pegs were broken I have sealed up the roof with “sickaflex”.

No the roof didn’t leak, yes like all sunroof R32’s is smelt like a wet dog when it rained. As the roof is now sealed it does not weep or smell when wet. This can be removed and if you replaced the broken pegs/legs so you could have a working sunroof.

Like all R32’s the left hand side air con vent is missing, the gear stick boot is also not in the car. I have the leather section but I am just missing the plastic section to hold it in, door speaker covers are also missing (might be in a box, if they are you can have them). Most of the boot trim is not in the car, what I have of it, will be included.

The body speaks for its self, car park dings and markings – It’s a daily. Guards have been rolled and mildly pulled to accommodate 18x11inch wheels, which are not included in the sale. Guards obviously show signs of wear and tear due to the mild pull.

Overall the car is a fun little unit that is easy and enjoyable to throw around. It’s un-tidy but reliable.

Not really interested in swaps and I’m well aware of what Skylines are bought and sold for, so hilarious low balls will be ignored. Happy trolling :mad:

01012007564.jpg

01012007566.jpg

01012007565.jpg

01012007567.jpg

01012007570.jpg

01012007571.jpg

01012007573.jpg

10062009547.jpg

10062009546.jpg

10062009545.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/282492-1992-r32-gtst/
Share on other sites



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...