Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey every one

Ok as you may know if you have read my last topic I have been having some issues most likely with my turbo and if it is out on its way I was looking at something else to get..

The reason the title states rb20 and 25, is because at the moment I have a rb20 however towards the end of this year/early next year I’m planning on putting a rb25 in my car, so what I’m asking for basically is what do you guys reckon would be a turbo that i could buy now and would suit the rb20 (don’t mind if there is a slight lag) and then also be optimum for a rb25 setup..

The power figures I’m aiming for in the rb25 is approx. 350-380 rwhp.

Also do you guys reckon I should buy a cheap r33 stock turbo for now and then when I buy a rb25 then buy a new bigger turbo, or would it be easier just buying a good one once that would work out on both engines..

Thanks Guys

Niran

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/282618-what-turbo-should-i-get/
Share on other sites

Hey guys let me edit the first post a bit even around 340 rwhp with the rb25 is fine, if that makes the turbo choice any easier ?

GT3076 should be good for that w/ correct supporting mods. Lag wouldn't much of an issue either.

the garett 3076 or even 3071 is a good option but if you want a cheaper option a hyper gear tr43i is a good option to ive been running one and am very happy with it so far and its half the prince.

the garett 3076 or even 3071 is a good option but if you want a cheaper option a hyper gear tr43i is a good option to ive been running one and am very happy with it so far and its half the prince.

hey man.. i will look into that more this week and see the prices of them, secondly i just had a question which was how much did the hyper gear tr41i cost you? ive checked the website however it says comming soon ?

Thanks every one for the help

Niran

The .63 TR43i is made to produce 300rwkws. For the RB20det engine .58 T3x ATR28G3 internally gated is a better option. They can make around 260rwkws on stock RB20det with excellent on road response. Price wise it cost $100 more. In Garrett range its some thing in between GT3071 and 76.

The .63 TR43i is made to produce 300rwkws. For the RB20det engine .58 T3x ATR28G3 internally gated is a better option. They can make around 260rwkws on stock RB20det with excellent on road response. Price wise it cost $100 more. In Garrett range its some thing in between GT3071 and 76.

Hey man

I was trying to get a T4R3i because i am planning on installing a rb25 later on.. if i did choose this turbo where abouts would full boost kick in with the rb20det engine? and how much is the turbo + shipping

Thanks

Hey man sorry i didnt mean the tr41i, i was ment to say the tr43i.

thanks

yeah it cost me 108o with the manifold to turbo gasket and oil lines and turbo, I really recomend it dont have power results myself for you yet since iam building it up since i have no lincese at the moment but with 550 cc injecors, nismo fuel pump, pwoer fc , upgraded clutch, fmic, full exhust z32 afm on my rb25 on prob bout 18 psi expecting sumtn around the 300 mark

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...