Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello,

I am looking for an electronic boost controller but have no idea what to look for.

It will be used on my GTST with (at the moment) standard turbo.

I'd like the unit to:

  1. Display boost
  2. Display max reached boost
  3. overboost / scramble mode
  4. reliable operation

From the looks of it I fancy the Blitz, since it displays a boost curve and all kind of other stuff.

However I'm afraid it might be a bit too small to be of real use.

I could get my hands on any of these one:

http://www.blitz.co.jp/products/electonic/..._ctr/sbc_id.htm

http://www.hks-power.co.jp/products/electr...oost/evc_s.html

And the other ones I have attached.

Thanks for any hint/advice ...

post-33912-1250251892_thumb.jpg

post-33912-1250251907.jpg

Edited by Torques
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/283423-is-this-a-good-boost-controller/
Share on other sites

how much do you want to spend

boost controllers are basically set and forget

once you set it properly

and you floor it, guess what, you reach max boost

so any electronic controller is really suitable

i mean you spend $800+ on a boost controller

for 3 bar boost and scramble and display etc

but what on earth for ???

scramble is pointless, if you can run 12psi safely, then run it all the time, if you can 21psi safely, run it all the time etc

if you want all the fandangle crap get the apexi aVC-R but be prepared to pay $$$ for it

and be prepared to spend time setting it up properly and tuning it

ive got the powerfc boost control kit which is the same parts as the AVCR but without the screen and its fine

its an add-on kit to the apexi PFC stand alone ECU so it works and plugs in no mess no fuss

i had an old 2nd hand HKS EVC III and it worked awesome ,cheap simple, electronic, overboost protection

no fancy screen, no fandangle, nice and cheap, set and forget

the main difference with the older EVC was price and the basic control unit, no fancy screen

you are paying premium $ for the screen

Hi there ...

Thanks for the input, much appreciated.

I thought of the scramble/overboost feature as a way of going shortly over the limit with the standard turbo charger.

In addition I thought it would be nice driving with lower boost in rain/snow conditions.

So a unit with different settings would come in handy.

But I agree you definably don't need all the gimmicks, especially when the display is as tiny as with the blitz.

I'll have a look at the HKS, it looks quite functional ... maybe just what I need?

B4RSK_094.JPG

I had the greddy profec B specII on my old R34 and it did the job that was required of it and It was one of the cheaper options at the time, personally one of the nicer looking ones to me also

once I got the settings right I pretty much left it alone to do it's thing, where I installed it was easy to keep out of sight

post-29425-1250266865_thumb.jpg

Gizzmo MS-IBC. Took me about 1 hour to hook it up, and set the boost.

Holds it rock steady! Has 6 boost levels and a scramble as well.

I like it because it JUST controls boost whenever i put my foot down. Personally, i dont like the extra functions of the other ebc's.. eg gear selective boosting etc as when you have problems, you will have more places to look at, whcih means more headaches, but thats just my opinion.

For the stock turbo, any ebc should do the trick. Its only when you have a big turbo setup that you need more precise control, eg dual solenoid controllers, etc.

It really comes down to how much you want to spend.

Google the top brands and look for comparisons, cos thats what i did.

there are issues by going shortly over the limit of the standard turbocharger

the first is it wont make any more power past 12psi, and it just throws out tons of heat

and second is it puts the turbocharger and engine at great risk, the shaft speed can cause it to fail

and the excessive heat can cause the exhaust wheel to fail (as its ceramic)

so you dont get any extra power and you put it all at great risk for the sake of having a "scramble" or "high boost" mode

you are far better off having the car and controller set at whatever safe limit you can run, 11psi is prefect on the stock turbo.

when you drive in the rain or snow, just drive like a normal person does, don't floor it and drive easily

the turbocharger will only wind up and put out power if you stomp on the accel pedal

so guess what, if you floor it, its going to come on boost and give you some power, so dont when its when or just go easy

^^ I have this installed in my car. It is a nice no BS unit and comes with a boost gauage (bit bright at night though).

Yo Yo: was it easy running the wiring into that compartment? I only found that hidey spot last week, thought it was fuse location, so never bothered to look lol :huh: Would like to get my controller unit out sight of the fuzz.

^^ I have this installed in my car. It is a nice no BS unit and comes with a boost gauage (bit bright at night though).

Yo Yo: was it easy running the wiring into that compartment? I only found that hidey spot last week, thought it was fuse location, so never bothered to look lol :huh: Would like to get my controller unit out sight of the fuzz.

yeah this unit luks good to hide sumwhere and adjust it den just worry about the rest off the gauge i like how has a digital reading on it aswell handy when wanting to check the boost when foot down.

Does anyone know what the deal is with the solenoid? I get that the excessive amount for gimmicks and screens is not worth it but doesn't some of these more expensive EBS have dual solenoids etc?

I run an IDIII, it has all the fruit but I mainly got it believing that the dual solenoids ensure accurate boost holding.

Any light?

I use the greddy profecB spec II. Works a treat and wasn't difficult to tune either. If you really want to you could rig up a momentary switch for it to switch Hi-Low mode but what the heck for?

I ditched my boost gauge and just use the profec as the boost display.

Hi Paul,

Thanks for the advice ... I thought it might be 'safe' going a few seconds over the limit.

But maybe I'm just looking for an excuse buying a larger turbo :(

If 11PSI is fine, I should be running 11PSI all the way.

Do you have any idea how many RPMs the turbo needs for 11PSI?

I have placed a bid on the following attached HKS.

If it's not working out I'll go for a Profec I guess.

there are issues by going shortly over the limit of the standard turbocharger

the first is it wont make any more power past 12psi, and it just throws out tons of heat

and second is it puts the turbocharger and engine at great risk, the shaft speed can cause it to fail

and the excessive heat can cause the exhaust wheel to fail (as its ceramic)

so you dont get any extra power and you put it all at great risk for the sake of having a "scramble" or "high boost" mode

you are far better off having the car and controller set at whatever safe limit you can run, 11psi is prefect on the stock turbo.

when you drive in the rain or snow, just drive like a normal person does, don't floor it and drive easily

the turbocharger will only wind up and put out power if you stomp on the accel pedal

so guess what, if you floor it, its going to come on boost and give you some power, so dont when its when or just go easy

post-33912-1250334133_thumb.jpg

Edited by Torques

Hi there ...

What's the difference dual solenoid compared to single?

And I like the Blitz as well, though I think it's too tiny a display.

Hmm ... decisions, decisions ... :(

Blitz dual solenoid beats all the others hands down. This is the 13th post down and I thought this was VERY common knowledge.

The latest iteration is the SBC i-D Spec R

http://translate.google.com/translate?prev...history_state0=

Yo Yo: was it easy running the wiring into that compartment? I only found that hidey spot last week, thought it was fuse location, so never bothered to look lol :P Would like to get my controller unit out sight of the fuzz.

oh you mean the coin slot? :/ I always kept spare change in the ashtray anyway so it was a logical choice to put something else, you have to be careful not to damage the tabs that hold it in place if you wanna take it out, I also had to cut the back of the coin slot out enough to fit the wires through

wiring wasn't too bad, didn't have any issues with wire/tube length for the profec B specII. All I did was run the wiring underneath the bottom of the dash piece and tucked it on the inside, held in place using plastic tabs and double sided tape

running the wires through the firewall grommet was a bit of a pita as expected :(

there are issues by going shortly over the limit of the standard turbocharger

the first is it wont make any more power past 12psi, and it just throws out tons of heat

and second is it puts the turbocharger and engine at great risk, the shaft speed can cause it to fail

and the excessive heat can cause the exhaust wheel to fail (as its ceramic)

so you dont get any extra power and you put it all at great risk for the sake of having a "scramble" or "high boost" mode

you are far better off having the car and controller set at whatever safe limit you can run, 11psi is prefect on the stock turbo.

when you drive in the rain or snow, just drive like a normal person does, don't floor it and drive easily

the turbocharger will only wind up and put out power if you stomp on the accel pedal

so guess what, if you floor it, its going to come on boost and give you some power, so dont when its when or just go easy

i am really getting sick of hearing this. the stock turbo WILL make more power above 12psi. i have personally seen it done on back to back dyno runs all the way up to 16psi. there is about a 15kw difference between 13 and 16psi. also i was running 14psi on my 33 and it felt much more powerful than on 11psi. and i know other people running 13 and 14psi who have also seen power gains from the higher boost.

so the turbo will make more power, it just isn't that safe to do it.

so believe me or not, but i know what i saw. and most of the people who say it won't make power over 12psi have never tried it.

the stock turbo WILL make more power above 12psi.

so the turbo will make more power, it just isn't that safe to do it.

I agree with what you said,

the way I look at it, while the stock turbo will continue to produce more power past 12 psi, the efficiency of the power increase however, will decrease as you raise the boost past 11-12psi

ie; the extra power gains to be had by pushing past 12psi are not worth the risk of added strain on the stock turbo.

All cars are different though, some guys on here will boast about having 14psi+ on stock snails and still going strong, if a turbo is gonna die it will die eventually, but adding extra fuel to the fire isn't going to help the situation imo

hi flow or bolt on replacement ftw if you want to chase the dragons :)

Hi there ...

What's the difference dual solenoid compared to single?

And I like the Blitz as well, though I think it's too tiny a display.

Hmm ... decisions, decisions ... :)

The dual solenoid controls pressure smoother and more accurately compared to others that sorta end up more 'pulsey'

The SBC i-D series boost controllers have a fairly large screen compared to most others. I'm not referring to the old one (dual-sbc) which does have a very small screen.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...