Jump to content
SAU Community

Car Has Fried 2 Ignitor Modules!

BoostedBarge

By BoostedBarge,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

Swiper the Fox Grand Master

Swiper the Fox

Posted
Posted (edited)
Ah yeah, good point. Haha

you may have to measure the base current with an ocilloscope using a current probe (similar to a tong ammeter). The transistor requires a 0.6V signal to be applied to the base to switch it on but if for some reason the circuit resistance may be too low, this will increase the current. This current (base emitter) and the current from the coil (collector emitter), flow through the transistor emitter to ground. Coupled with the fact you are running wasted spark which in theory will double the current may increase the problem a small rise in the base current can have. The ecu should have current limiting resistors fitted to the ignition driver outputs to limit this. Proper testing with the right equipment will be required to prove each circuit is correct.

We run the same ecu/coil/igniter/dwell in our circuit car and have not had an issue.

Edited by DiRTgarage
  • 2 weeks later...
BoostedBarge Rising Star

BoostedBarge

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Quick update: I'm back at work in New Caledonia now. Before I left I cut open another ignitor that the car had fried. It also had a dead ground connection. This time it was not the track that was burnt out, but the little piece of wire that connects the PCB to the terminal. I soldered a bit of wire in its place, so now I have a spare ignitor. Fingers crossed, the car doesn't play up on my wife while I'm away.

Swiper the Fox Grand Master

Swiper the Fox

Posted
Posted (edited)
Quick update: I'm back at work in New Caledonia now. Before I left I cut open another ignitor that the car had fried. It also had a dead ground connection. This time it was not the track that was burnt out, but the little piece of wire that connects the PCB to the terminal. I soldered a bit of wire in its place, so now I have a spare ignitor. Fingers crossed, the wife doesn't play up while I'm away.

fixed :)

Edited by DiRTgarage
BoostedBarge Rising Star

BoostedBarge

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I'm running a Vipec, but hundreds of people are running this or a Link without a problem, so very strange... I had the Vipec on the car for 7 months without a problem and then the car fried 3 modules in 4 months, so I don't think the ECU is to blame. I've emailed Ray Hall (Vipec) all the details and he was quite helpful. He asked his engineers to look into it and they couldn't see any problem from their end. He's even offered a replacement ECU free of charge, just in case, but he's quite confident it's not an ECU issue.

I've now disabled overrun fuel cut, just in case this was causing the issue. As I mentioned above, I believe that all 3 times the module failed during similar circumstances (coasting down a hill). It's probably just coincidence. Ray doesn't think overrun is an issue and many Vipec users have it enabled without any problems.

Now I've got a thick piece of wire in the ground circuit of the ignitor, so with any luck it won't blow again. Well it may not be the ground connection that fails next time, but perhaps something else will fail... Time will tell

  • 3 weeks later...
BoostedBarge Rising Star

BoostedBarge

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Quick update: It has been running fine with the fixed ignitor module. I swapped in the 2nd module that I fixed and that one runs fine, too :)

Ray Hall sent down a new ECU last week and I swapped that in with no problems. It was bloody good of them to send a replacement even though they don't think it's an ECU problem. Now just keeping fingers crossed...

  • 1 year later...
Chris Wilson Proficient

Chris Wilson

Posted
Posted (edited)

I am not an electronics guru at all, but this may help, or not, but I shall post it anyway :thumbsup:

I have an RB26 engine running a Motec M800 ecu here in the UK. It runs the coils individually, as stock, not in wasted spark format. It started eating stock igniter boxes nearly straight away, and all were new ones. The symptoms were it would be fine until I took it on track, and after say 6 laps it would start to miss. By the time I got it back to the pits it would have dropped at least one cylinder. Let it cool, or fit another igniter it was OK again. I got through 3 new genuine boxes, and the cost was getting ridiculous. My mapper, an ex Motec Australia guy called Dave Rowe, took some dwell out and it seemed to fix things, but I never felt it ran as strongly through peak torque. I got two Bosch triple igniter modules. I chose those beacause I could borrow them off my Volvo V90 road car, it has two for its straight six lump, and because Motec had the pinouts for them. I extended the wiring away from the ludicrous place Nissan put the stock igniter, over to the RH inner wing and mounted the Bosch igniters on a nice big alloy heat sink, bolted in turn to the inner wing sheet metal. I turned the dwell back up and the car has done lots of track days and many hours trouble free running, The Bosch igniters barely get warm. I would use these igniter boxes on any other RB engines I build now, they are cheap, have readily available new connector shells and contacts, and they fixed my issues. I am now toying with having a look inside one of my stock Nissan boxes, but my problem was heat related and intermittent. Could a burnt track act that way?

Great forum by the way, some serious technical issues are addressed and usually soundly beaten :)

Edited by Chris Wilson
Scooby Veteran

Scooby

Posted
Posted

Chris

The igniter failures that BoostedBarge and I (documented here http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Vi...0&start=20) have experienced have been when coasting to a stop to negotiate a junction or similar, and always sudden and final as once the earth cct is gone, nothing works. No missing etc to indicate a problem. Sounds to me like one of the relays in yours is failing, hence the miss.

ARTZ Grand Master

ARTZ

Posted
Posted (edited)

Does it get real hot? I had an ignitor kept getting really hot, though it never blew like yours, tried earthing but made very little differnece. It turned out to be a tiny bent pin in the ecu giving low voltage.

Luckily I had a smart bloke on the job cause I doubt I ever would of figured it out.

Not sure if this is related but just thought Id share..

Edited by Arthur T3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • GTSBoy
      DeAgostini 1/8 scale BNR32 Nissan Skyline GT-R Nismo

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      That's hilariously putrid!
    • GTSBoy
      R33 Fuel Pump & Brakes after alarm swap

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...