Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hope you get it sorted and can finally view your ps3 in hd

Off topic on that note i noticed alot of your comments in the past about the ps3 having far superior graphics to the xbox 360. I find it odd that you could have a such a strong opinion when you werent even playing in HD 1080p or at least 720p.

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

hope you get it sorted and can finally view your ps3 in hd

Off topic on that note i noticed alot of your comments in the past about the ps3 having far superior graphics to the xbox 360. I find it odd that you could have a such a strong opinion when you werent even playing in HD 1080p or at least 720p.

Thanks, i hope so too, will update it as soon as i have news.

I have played it in HD before, just not my own, and it has been sometime since i have last played in HD, hence i cannot remember what kind of visual difference it has, no doubt im biased to Sony more so than Microsoft, but i try and be as open as possible, that said, i don't want this thread to turn into some fan boy rant between consoles as i can appreciate each for what they are, and personally prefer the PS3.

Alright, for those interested,

I took the cable back today and tested it, sure enough the cable didn't work,

I was given another free of charge, took it home, plugged it in, and presto, PS3 picked it up right away, had to reset the Display settings by holding in the 'On' button when turning the system on (for those who didn't know about that)

Now just have to get the lady off the tv so i can play some Fight Night round 4 :/

Cheers for all of the input guys

hey, i had this problem too but it was because i had my audio coming from optical and my video through hdmi and becuase of this it defaults the playstation to component output

Hold down the on button for a good 10 seconds, until the PS3 beeps again.

This will reset the Picture to 560i - then you can change the settings in the display menu.

I work at acegamestore and we get this all the time.

had the same issue

bought a sony HDMI cable from EB games and my problem was solved.

took apart the old cables head to find that over time. the cheaper $25 cables core just eroded

dont know how but it just did

Monster HDMI cable for the win. Those cheap HDMI cables are shit, motion scenes never look as sharp due to the low speed transfer rate. When you spend big money on a 1080P hi-def TV i don't understand why people let it down with a cheap cable.

What are you talking about low transfer rate?

All cables meet a minimum requirement, otherwise they could not send 1080p

HDMI uses checksum as its digital - you do not nee some $150 cable with gold plating, super titanium insulation and any other marketing bullshit etc etc.

$20, all you need for a cable. All i spent, my picture is perfect.

What are you talking about low transfer rate?

All cables meet a minimum requirement, otherwise they could not send 1080p

HDMI uses checksum as its digital - you do not nee some $150 cable with gold plating, super titanium insulation and any other marketing bullshit etc etc.

$20, all you need for a cable. All i spent, my picture is perfect.

+1 my cheapie cable does the job perfectly fine

Put the same TV (a good quality 50"+ 1080P) side by side with a cheap cable and a decent HDMI cable and you will see a difference. Speaking from experience here, not "marketing bullshit". My parents have a 52" XBR and i have a 52" Sharp, both improved in picture quality from getting a better cable than what we had which was a cheap shit $10 cable. Not saying you need to spend top dollar, but not all those cheap cables are good.

Start reading if you wish http://www.monstercable.com/HDMI/the_facts_on_hdmi.asp

It's a digital signal.

It's either on or off. There is no degredation of the picture thats associated with analog signals like RCA.

As for your source of this information...Linking a monster cable self promotion page, is like asking a barber if you need a haircut.

I would like to see identical model TV's and everything else the same.

Having the same size screen means nothing when it comes to relevant evidence or "experience".

It's a digital signal.

It's either on or off. There is no degredation of the picture thats associated with analog signals like RCA.

As for your source of this information...Linking a monster cable self promotion page, is like asking a barber if you need a haircut.

I would like to see identical model TV's and everything else the same.

Having the same size screen means nothing when it comes to relevant evidence or "experience".

I couldn't have said it better.

FYI PM-R33 - I have a 55" Samsung Series 9, their flagship. There is no difference :)

Monster have good promotion and marketing, but it is far from fact.

Over 5-7 meters i can see advantages of better shielded cabling etc if you run past big hi-fi and similar. However large portions of people are 5m or less.

It also makes me laugh you need the "super dooper" cable for 120Hz - The fken TV is putting 120Hz refresh rates out, not the player. What a load of shit.

And for the record, the naked eye can only see a tad over 60 FPS anyway. (you'll see now the latest TV marketing crap is 240Hz Refresh, load of crap)

More from me later - gotta work. However i'll come with loads more info :ph34r:

Fact: I had some cheap no brand shit HDMI cable and while playing blurays on high motion scenes it looked out of focus, blurry if you may. Did this on both TV's.

Fact: Replaced the cheap cable with a Monster one and what do you know, it wasn't blurry any more and stayed in focus.

Take from it what you want, maybe the cables we had were bad, still doesnt change the fact that the monster one was better. There are 100's of different shit cables on the market, all im saying is pay a little bit more and you know its a good cable for a TV that cost 100 times more than the cable in the first place. God you love arguing over the simplest shit Ash, its a $100 cable compared to a $20-$30 cable....Ohhh look out, going to have to get a bank loan for that one.

Edited by PM-R33

The point is does it get you from point A to point B in the same time? Yep. But sure, it looks cool.

Do you know if the cable was damaged or not?

Sure sounds like it was to me as that is the symptoms of any damaged cable.

You're the one that is arguing actually, quoting some rubbish propaganda from a website soley created to promote its own product.

Probably a bit hurt over the fact you got stung $100 for a piece of cable.

But then those that don't reseach what they are buying, and then find out they paid way over price, are understanably jaded.

The point is does it get you from point A to point B in the same time? Yep. But sure, it looks cool.

Saying something like that on a car forum where people modify their cars to go fast and look good, including you, is a bit irrelevent isn't it? I don't see you driving a Prius do I.

Do you know if the cable was damaged or not?

Sure sounds like it was to me as that is the symptoms of any damaged cable.

It could possibly have been. It could have also just been some shit cable, who knows. However this is my point, the cable might have been fine originally, but cheap shit usually breaks or stops working hence why i bought something that is good quality so i know it works fine. If my mate was here im sure he could throw some technical shit back at you regarding cabling since he lives the stuff however is that going to change your mind, probably not. This is the same reason you personally don't recommend cheap chinese ebay turbo's to people, sure they might work just as well as others, but none the less, they are cheap for a reason.

You're the one that is arguing actually, quoting some rubbish propaganda from a website soley created to promote its own product.

Probably a bit hurt over the fact you got stung $100 for a piece of cable.

But then those that don't reseach what they are buying, and then find out they paid way over price, are understanably jaded.

Lol i aint hurt, i aint cheap to be cut over $100 on a cable for TV's that cost a few thousand dollars each for a home cinema worth even more. If i was worried about spending coin i wouldn't be driving a skyline.

Dude let's just let it go, this is going no where.

Edited by PM-R33
Saying something like that on a car forum where people modify their cars to go fast and look good, including you, is a bit irrelevent isn't it? I don't see you driving a Prius do I.

It could possibly have been. It could have also just been some shit cable, who knows. However this is my point, the cable might have been fine originally, but cheap shit usually breaks or stops working hence why i bought something that is good quality so i know it works fine. If my mate was here im sure he could throw some technical shit back at you regarding cabling since he lives the stuff however is that going to change your mind, probably not. This is the same reason you personally don't recommend cheap chinese ebay turbo's to people, sure they might work just as well as others, but none the less, they are cheap for a reason.

Lol i aint hurt, i aint cheap to be cut over $100 on a cable for TV's that cost a few thousand dollars each for a home cinema worth even more. If i was worried about spending coin i wouldn't be driving a skyline.

Dude let's just let it go, this is going no where.

I really didn't want to jump on board with this, but you are now simply contradicting yourself, re-read that statement that i highlighted in bold, then re-read what your initial posts said, initially it was that an expensive cable is better and will deliver better 'quality', now it is that the cheapie cable may have been fine originally but you bought an expensive one just to be sure that it will work.

So it's either, the expensive cable is better because it provides a better quality of image and sound, or it's better because you think that it is less likely to break/get damaged.

I think the general consensus with most things is that you pay more as you expect to get better build quality, but for something that is put under minimal stress at best, for the wider market, a cheap cable will do the job, and an equal level of quality.

Comparing HDMI cables to Turbos is ridiculous, totally different kettle of fish.

Here are just a few of the many results that turn up in google when looking for a comparison between and expensive and a cheap HDMI cable, there is not a lot of support for the big name big price cables to be found.

http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index...03162558AAaTtpp

http://stuff.tv/forums/thread/33821.aspx

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology...de/4235717.html

http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index...14075037AAq9seT

http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index...08144553AAjU9Fy

At any rate, the cheapie cable that i am using now works brilliant, delivers beautiful picture and audio.

Use what you feel works best, but for the record, there is no substantial evidence that i can find that proves an expensive cable to be any better than a cheap one.

Sorry, when i ment it worked originally i ment maybe some time when it was made, it never worked good for me.

But fair enough, i'll agree with what has been said. However in my situation the cheap cable didn't work well and frustrated the hell out of me with having such expensive TV's not looking perfect. Got a good one, problem was fixed :) Maybe it was interference with another part of the home theatre and the better cable shielded from it better. Who knows.

If they work fine for you guys well there you go.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been being VERY quiet about what you're alluding to, as it is something that ticks me off... The number of cars from factory that run coil overs is HUGE! Most of them these days do... The other part that annoys me, is people saying "Well all the incabin adjustable suspension is illegal by blah blah blah"... If that's the case, then why can I buy a car brand new that can do it if, FULL STOP in cabin adjustable suspension is illegal...   Also, I could just chuck some aftermarket shocks in my car, throw the stock springs on, after my blue slip, dump my super low springs back in. Same shock and spring style setup... Hell, they could also be the same colour springs etc.     I'm voting, BlueSlipper didn't want to touch the above car for some reason. Whether it be some sort of bias against the car, the owner, them maybe having previously done dodgy shit and now they're being super careful in case they get slapped in the face by the Gumbyment again... Find a new blueslip place.   And can confirm as you had said, yes there are holy bibles of vehicle heights, and all sorts of other suspension stuff. Heck your run of the mill mechanic, and tyre shop has access to all of that stuff. It's how they do wheel alignments...
    • Funny story Heading to Sydney this morning on the HWY there was some slow traffic, so I gave it the beans and midway through my overtaking "power run" I lost all power It seems that I missed a hose clamp,  and the MAF and filter went WiFi To make this more problematic, the little tool kit that lives in the boot, is sitting in the sun room at Goulburn......LOL Luckily for me I found a bit of steel on the side of the road that could be used like a rusty and bent flat head screw driver to tighten it up enough that it got me into Sydney, it is now all tight like a tiger with the aid of a 8mm socket Note to self: Use my brain and double check stuff, and always keep that little tool kit in the car for when I have a brain fart
    • Oh, and as for everyone with their fuel economy changes, I switch between E10 and 98 in the company car. Even do when I had personal cars that could run on E10. You know what changed my fuel economy in any noticeable way? How I drove, and where I drove. Otherwise, say on full tanks of just back and forth from work only (So same trips, same sort of traffic), couldn't notice a difference that I can correlate to the type of fuel in use. In the current vehicle, that's over 42L of USABLE fuel. While 98 is all "more energy dense", it also has higher knock resistance as it takes more energy to get it to ignite too. The longer hydrocarbons, typically more tightly bound. So running the same ignition map, can also produce less power, if there isn't enough time to get it all burnt through properly, as yep, the flame propagation speed is different from lower octane fuel to higher (Higher has a lower flame propagation, due to the more tightly bound and harder to self ignite funs. This is also typically where, a vehicle that is designed purely to run on 91 (Whether it be E10 or normal 91) usually sees absolutely no real world difference in fuel economy for the normal man, woman, or dog.
    • We've got some servos around me that have 91 with E10, 91 (no E10), 95, and 98. At those stations the change from 91 E10 to 91, is typically around 8c/L.   But lets not get started on the price of fuel in Oz. It's ridiculous. All the service stations around me, bar one, the price of fuel has been over the $2 mark per litre for the cheapest, 98 being around $2.45. That one service station is a CostCo, fuel from it comes from the same refineries, and makes no pitstops, it runs great, including the 98. In fact, I've had no issues on CostCo fuel, but plenty of issues at other stations!. The CostCo fuel, was $1.65 roughly this week for 94 with E10. $1.88 for 98. Servos directly across from it, $2.10 for 91 E10, and $2.48 for 98. The part I had to laugh at? If I drive multiple HOURS away from Brisbane, say out near Nanango, or Kingaroy, or even out to Goondiwindi, the price of their fuel, is the same as what it is at the CostCo... Oh, and that BP servo at Goondiwindi is HUGE and goes through epic turnover of fuel, so it's not sitting there for weeks going to shit. And what blows me away, my mate is one of the people who drives the Fuel Tanker all around QLD, delivering to all those places. At the same company his previous role was doing the "local haul" deliveries... Same truck, same driver, same pickup point it all comes from. So you tell me, how the hell it is 60c/L CHEAPER for fuel, when nearly all else is equal, except they require a B-Double to drive half a day out of Brisbane, and half a day back, every second day, compared to the delivery that can be under 30 minutes drive from the fuel pickup point... Not to mention, go five blocks down the road, and Ampol to Ampol will vary 30c/L... And I've had this conversation with my mate... The way it's priced, is just typical, pure and utter rubbish... He also does runs from Brisbane, to all over QLD, down to Newcastle, Sydney, Nowra, Melbourne, Geelong, and even out to parts of the NT depending on the companies needs. His main stuff is all the longer distance away from home for a few days at a time, then when he's back, he loves to just pickup extra shifts wherever he can in whichever truck, hence all the weird different places.   Oh, as for getting E10 into all the fuels in Australia... It was very quickly highlighted, that we don't have enough biomass available to use to make E10 sustainably like they require, and it would dramatically cut into our, and the worlds food chain supply...   I vote we all just start running on liquid methane gas... Plenty of that just getting tapped off at tips from underground decay... (Note, this is pure just stupid commenting. I could very easily highlight the reasons its not a good idea especially on scale...)
    • Am I correct in assuming that the R35's are getting the classic skyline haircut off the odometer?  Quick search on carsales, there are 33 08 and 09 GTR's for sale, only 2 of them have more then 100,000km's on them (116,075 and 110,000 respectively).  And somehow there are about 25 for sale with around 60,000kms? Looks like the classic skyline haircut to me =/
×
×
  • Create New...