Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i am also gonna change mine too...my stillen sway bars (F + R) and front strut brace arrived last week...along with my stillen catback exhaust...

did u have to get a customs broker to clear the items? it was a very costly exercise for me...customs, GST, clearance, fees, delivery costed me almost $800 alone!!!

i am also gonna change mine too...my stillen sway bars (F + R) and front strut brace arrived last week...along with my stillen catback exhaust...

did u have to get a customs broker to clear the items? it was a very costly exercise for me...customs, GST, clearance, fees, delivery costed me almost $800 alone!!!

Next time ask the seller to mark the value as less than $1000.

Works every time.

You will get screwed on insurance if they get lost or damaged tho.

hehe you know black beauty right! :blink:

(i sounded bias again just then) :down: hehe

don't blame you man, like I said before your v35 changed my opinion on owning a black car :blink:

as for shipping Siu Loong Bao I'm guessing you had all your stuff arrive at once? I only had to pay for the shipping and swaybars to the vendor and arrived via fedex 3 months later

so the value of goods would've been well under $500 anyway

  • 3 weeks later...

update exhaust is on just in time for Oran Park too!

Fujistubo Legalis R

I'm organising a dyno run soon but the by the butt dyno I could feel a noticable increase in the midrange, top end feels a bit looser now to get too and low down feels the same

This exhaust is sooo quiet it's awesome, it reminds me of my old HKS hi-power silent that I had on my GTT as the idle note wasn't any louder but had a meaner tone to it and when I put my foot down it sounds aggressive without any drone, in fact there's no drone at all, which is exactly what I wanted from it so overall I'm very happy

I feel that this is how the car should have sounded stock as it's not obnoxious at all would still be quiet enough for people who would buy the car for cruising/daily driving

DSCF1731.jpg

DSCF1733.jpg

DSCF1736.jpg

DSC05876.jpg

for shuts and guggles eh bro

th_DSCF1734.jpg

th_DSCF1738.jpg

Yes/No?

sany0058s.jpg

sany0062p.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...