Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok guys ...

clearing out some space to make way for new useless junk :(

There may be more shiet that i find that isnt listed, but whatever is here, ill throw your way free of charge ;)

For just 1.5k flat you will get the following and then some:

[referring to OEM factory stock r34 vspec 2 parts - all in perfect working order no issues guaranteed]

- shocks and springs

- cam cover

- cam gears

- pulleys

- camshafts

- injectors

- front and rear camber arms

- fuel pump

- gtr engine plaque

- fmic + bovs + all piping / hosing

- radiator

- tail lights

- turbos

Random

- brand new trust air filter.

- twin trust filters

- nismo gear knob

Thats all i can think of for now. As i said, if theres anything else i find, ill throw it your way.

Any questions, dont hesitate to PM me

Most PMs have been replied to ... have some kind of 5 minute limit to reply between each pm ...

Would prefer to sell everything but see how things goes ..

Also just found

- nismo oil cap

- vspec 2 ecu

- oem single din pocket

- the turbos have the stock dump pipes attached

- hks ssqv brand new purple fin

- project mu brake pads front and rear with about 80-90% pad left

- random hoses + pipes

pics will be up tonight

All that plus the original post for just 1.5k!!!

Edited by Phantom Snail
are the tail lights complete? (including outer plastic housings)

no they dont have the outter plastic, thats still on the car.

Basically i removed these to fit nismo ones .. so its the light and the wires .. not the housing on the car

mate im keen on the nismo oil cap, are willing to seperate?? is it genuine, pics?

I may separate depending on the interest i get on all parts .. it seems positive and likely at this stage that i may separate ... will wait for further replies to confirm

Yes it is genuine, pictures of most of the stuff will be up tonight

how much for the ssqv??? and where are you at?

Its just the purple fin, not the actual bov.

Im located in Sydney, Fairfield East. Pick up is not a problem.

Ok guys ... as promised, the pictures of most of the items

Please disregard the boxes/packaging that you may see the items in, they are the items i had upgraded to, and the standard oem parts were placed back in the corresponding packages

IMG_1274.jpg

IMG_1275.jpg

IMG_1276.jpg

IMG_1277.jpg

IMG_1278.jpg

IMG_1279.jpg

IMG_1280.jpg

IMG_1281.jpg

IMG_1282.jpg

IMG_1283.jpg

IMG_1284.jpg

IMG_1285.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...