Jump to content
SAU Community

What Can I Modify Without Approval?.... And Im240 Update.


Recommended Posts

And the list is out on what mods you can make without DPI approval including SUNVISORS and STEREO SYSTEMS.

One thing though the part just on exhausts is actually quite easy to understand, so more thought has been put into this. LINK to Modified exhaust systems

LINK to What can I modify without approval?

Many minor vehicle modifications can be carried out without specific approval. However, they are still subject to compliance with the Road Traffic (Vehicle Standards) Regulations 2002, Road Traffic (Vehicle Standards) Rules 2002 and the Australian Design Rules (for date of manufacture and vehicle category).

Please note: This isn't an exhaustive list of modifications that don't require approval. Please contact us to check the status of your particular modification.

LINK TO Visit our When Is Approval Required? section for details on other common modifications which do require approval.

Modifications you can make without approval include:

* Tyre size and aspect ratio

* Additional lighting

* Single tone air horns

* Air conditioners

* Air shock absorbers

* Alarm systems

* Badge bars

* Gearbox (pre 1976)

* Mud spats and pebble guards

* mesh stone shields for wind screens and lamps

* Body markings and speed striping

* Rear-view mirrors

* Roof racks

* Radio and stereo systems

* Sunvisors

* Optional manufacturer seating

* seat belts for pre 1969 cars (no full harness types)

* Stabilise bars

* Torque rods and traction bars (not semi-tramp types)

* Venetian blinds and other internal screening systems are allowed subject to a clear view to the rear

Remember, generally, no modification may be carried out if it :

* reduces the strength of the vehicle body

* reduces the controllability of the vehicle

* reduces the safety of the vehicle

LINK TO Emission Testing of Light Vehicles in WA.

The Department of Transport has introduced a moratorium on IM240 emissions testing. The purpose of the moratorium is to allow existing requirements to be reviewed to address industry stakeholder concerns. During this period, a temporary modification permit, valid for six months, will be issued for vehicles that may require IM240 testing under the revised policy.

Vehicles with modifications likely to affect emissions will need to be assessed by the Transport's Vehicle Safety and Standards Section (VSSS).

Engineering reports, other information and checklists that demonstrate the vehicle complies with standards will still be requested.

Until the new IM240 testing policy is introduced, the requirement to submit evidence of emission testing will be deferred for a limited period of six (6) months only. The Department may require a five gas analyser test as assurance that the vehicle does not have extremely high levels of emissions.

Providing all other criteria are met, a modification permit valid for six (6) months will be issued.

A second, permanent modification permit will be issued after the six month period expires, provided that the vehicle passes any emission testing required under the new policy.

Which modifications are affected?

In general, the following modifications are likely to have an effect on emissions and are dealt with under this policy:

o

Engines modified by the fitment of a supercharger or turbocharger

o

Individually constructed vehicles (ICVs)

o

Engines that have been significantly modified to enhance performance (e.g. with the fitment of a high performance camshaft)

o

When there is reprogramming of the electronic control unit (ECU, the engine management computer), or a chip swap

o

Major modifications to the exhaust systems - where the catalytic converter has been replaced with one that may not be fit for purpose or where the operation of the catalytic converter may be affected by aftermarket modifications (such as extractors) or significant relocation from the original position

NB: Certain minor modifications of the exhaust system may be deemed unlikely to impact significantly upon vehicle emissions. In this case, the owner will be issued with a permanent modification permit and will not be required to undertake future IM240 testing for the modification(s) in question.

IMPORTANT

The IM240 emission test is still a valid test. Should you choose to undertake the test and consequently pass it, then you will satisfy the policy requirements.

I'm doing coil-overs, POD, and 'zaust at the moment.

My instinct is to 'fcuk it' and not bother with permit BS and the costly emissions test.

I'm worried I'll void my insurance though?

Im sure as long as u mention all your mods to insurance its all valid

Mmm im pretty sure for insurance to be valid, the mods need to be legal, as they may claim it was your modification that caused the car to crash or sustain or inflict heavy damage. Permits will counter any claims the insurance may have that your mods are not safe. If it were me i would rather know they were legal, pits and engineers will not usually give you a hard time as long as your mods are actually safe and legal. Cops on the other hand would love you to not have permits

Im pretty sure coilovers, pod and exhaust wont affect insurance

almost all skylines have pod and exhaust and if they didnt cause the accident

insurance has no excuse to not pay out

It would be pretty hard for insurance to prove a pod or exhaust casued the accident (why not call your insurnace up and asK?)

Yes permits would serve a better piece of mind

but its not like an engine conversion or a huge f**k off T88 turbo

Im pretty sure coilovers, pod and exhaust wont affect insurance

almost all skylines have pod and exhaust and if they didnt cause the accident

insurance has no excuse to not pay out

It would be pretty hard for insurance to prove a pod or exhaust casued the accident (why not call your insurnace up and asK?)

Yes permits would serve a better piece of mind

but its not like an engine conversion or a huge f**k off T88 turbo

Yeh no, fair call, i wasn't really being specific to his mods, was just saying insurance will require legal mods. Those mods won't have any dramas, just saying that if you were to be doing a mod that may be considered illegal, then you had best get it done legally to avoid trouble

my tein super streets jap specs on my 32 are permitted, also my bride brix II seats are too.

what about gauges, always getting told off because obstucting view (when its on the A piller), have you seen other peeps with their big arse gps right in the middle of the windscreen

also why do cops say you need permits for just about everything you have changed in your car where only a small percentage of the mods need permits

on my 32 on my form i filled it out for, rb26, brides, coilovers, pods, oil cooler, front mount, strut braces, steering wheel, exhaust.

and all that need appoval was, the rb26, seats and coilovers well thats all that was said on my permits.

what about gauges, always getting told off because obstucting view (when its on the A piller), have you seen other peeps with their big arse gps right in the middle of the windscreen

The other explanation I got was aftermarket boost gauges can distract u from driving but a GPS won't... some how :P

mate went over today and just passed, kosteci's said that the test is being trialed for the next 6 months as is, then they will do improvements to it :)

cost him 750 the first time and 850 the second time through. he put the car back to stock (vy commo) and only just passed. and get this, one of the costs was to tie down to the dyno and warm up his car, cost *** $230***. WTF :D

mate went over today and just passed, kosteci's said that the test is being trialed for the next 6 months as is, then they will do improvements to it :down:

cost him 750 the first time and 850 the second time through. he put the car back to stock (vy commo) and only just passed. and get this, one of the costs was to tie down to the dyno and warm up his car, cost *** $230***. WTF :P

So in other words Kosteci is still running the monopoly? :down:

mate went over today and just passed, kosteci's said that the test is being trialed for the next 6 months as is, then they will do improvements to it ;)

cost him 750 the first time and 850 the second time through. he put the car back to stock (vy commo) and only just passed. and get this, one of the costs was to tie down to the dyno and warm up his car, cost *** $230***. WTF :P

Wait, what!? Didnt the first post of this thread detail there was a moratorium on this bullshit IM240 test for six months? Why is your mate bothering to get the test at Kosteci's, and why are they still charging like wounded bulls when their practices are obviously under the microscope??

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks for the response. This is an 04 EP3 Type R. JDM spec. Fairly certain they're just basic BC racing coils. I do plan to keep as the ride quality on stock I've been told is pretty meh given Sydney roads. If I were to go down that avenue, does NSW require them to be a certain spec (close to original) etc?
    • Should have asked what is the car?
    • I've had two super conflicting experiences with blue slips. My 30 year old E39 waltzed through with no issues but my brother in law was knocked back on 12 y/o 3 series due to wiper blades and some cracking in a control arm bush.  What kind of coil overs? Do you want to keep them after?  If it was me I'd get some dirt cheap shocks and springs from eBay or scumtree. Not ideal but will get you over the line and might even be less than $1k.
    • Hey guys,  Way back when (about 15yrs plus), I picked up a beautiful set of Tein 'Super Racing Spec Circuit Master RE' coilovers from Russman. I have legit never fitted them to my car, as it was garaged indefinitely while i bought a house Yada Yada. They look brand new! Anyway its time to pick up where I left off, and have started doing some khanacross and am booked in for a hill climb next month. The car has some hard af Nismo shocks in ATM, which has me wanting to upgrade again, and now I am left wondering if it's worth having these teins rebuilt? I think they where an ok shock back then, but how do they compare to what's on the market now?  Shockworks/mca are 2800+, and I am sure they are great. But if I can have these rebuilt and be better than, say, a set of bc's for around the cost of bc's, I would be happy with the performance v cost trade off.  If they are considered outdated and rubbish these days, so be it, I'll put them on the shelf and be happy to look at the pretty green colour while I save for the SW/MCA option. Grateful for your thoughts on the matter, and suggestions on who could do the rebuild if it's a worthwhile pursuit.  cheers, Rowdy. 
    • I can't speak for the US, but for Canada as I mentioned above, all fuel gases contain ethanol. We have regulations for E5/E10/E15. Each province handles it differently but basically any fuel gases sold must be E10 and slowly increasing to E15 by a certain year. 
×
×
  • Create New...