Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 14.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

lol good luck with that whole not going to jail reasonable force argument Ben

i almost guarantee if you shiv someone who is stealing your car that wouldn't count as reasonable force hence you loose and we visit you in the big house

and if it really was a "shiv" that would show prior intent to do somebody harm and you may end up on murder but probably dropped to manslaughter with a good QC

a) being on someone elses property is a caveat in itself

b) a flathead screwdriver, conveniently placed in a cars garage, makes a very good shiv. and theres no way in hell you can prove 'murder' when someone unknown to you comes to your own house, with intent to steal. manslaughter, sure. murder no.

c) reasonable force depends on one thing - the amount of fear you have for your own life - which nobody can argue otherwise. I suggest you both look at the wording of the law on this matter. Its pretty biased towards the home owner. Remember, this came about after a man killed a kid who broke into his place and faced a manslaughter conviction. The public outrage alone is what forced rann to implement those home invasion laws.

d) if eugene mcgee can get off with a good lawyer, after running a bloke down, and then lying to the crown, then anyone who kills a man on his own land in defence of his own property, will most certainly get off. on this case, public opinion will be on the side of the defendant.

e) a good lawyer is worth more than words alone. i could point to many other cases than mcgee.

I find it very ironic that some of the very people who say that justice is never served, or that the system is completely biased towards repeat offenders, are now saying that a custodial sentence is inevitable in these circumstances. It is not. Defence of ones property is the same as defence of ones own person, and this isnt my opinion, it just happens to be written down in black and white. You guys better make your mind up whether or not the justice system works or not. If you think it works, quit bitching when someone gets off. The circumstances of each and every case are complex and that is why we have informed magistrates and judges to keep society working, and with the exception of a few fringe cases, the judicial system works perfectly. All it takes is the media in this state (which we know to be biased) to amp up any issue they feel is necessary to sell some more copies, or get more ratings...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-defence_%28Australia%29 is a good start, but if you're interested in common law then a visit to the state library would be on the agenda, as the books that contain the statutes are very big and heavy.

-D

Edit for the lazy ;

Under South Australian law, the general defence appears in s15(1) Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA) for defending a person's life, and s15A(1) for defending property, subject to a hybrid test, i.e. the defendant honestly believed the threat to be imminent and made an objectively reasonable and proportionate response to the circumstances as the accused subjectively perceived them.

And that, my friends, is why lawyers exist.

oh sorry wiki's say's so, so it must be true

you do make good argument for the amount of danger you perceive yourself to be in

well it might come from wiki, but it does refer to our actual, bona fide liber legis, but i guess thats beyond your comprehension

nice work trying to discredit that information too on the basis that it links to something innocuous...if you think a wiki is wrong, do some research and check the edit log... *sigh*

newtons law says that every action results in an equal and opposite reaction.

try this on for size

a) perpetrator comes into property owners yard, attempts to abscond with

b) victim (by definition the recipient of hostile actions from a perpetrator) confronts perpetrator

a) perpetrator is confronted, available decisions are fight or flee (most will flee)

b) if perpetrator decides to fight, on hostile ground, against one who is defending their own property, then perp. is capable of any hostile action

Also, in all legal statutes, the home of a person is sacrosanct, which is why warrants are required for property searches.

Illegal searches are the bane of any law enforcement agency, because it means tonnes of paperwork, depositions, court dates and hearings, and this costs them a LOT. I only quote that fact to reinforce the fact that the home is protected by an entire subset of laws.

-D

c) reasonable force depends on one thing - the amount of fear you have for your own life - which nobody can argue otherwise. I suggest you both look at the wording of the law on this matter. Its pretty biased towards the home owner. Remember, this came about after a man killed a kid who broke into his place and faced a manslaughter conviction. The public outrage alone is what forced rann to implement those home invasion laws.

I find it very ironic that some of the very people who say that justice is never served, or that the system is completely biased towards repeat offenders, are now saying that a custodial sentence is inevitable in these circumstances. It is not. Defence of ones property is the same as defence of ones own person, and this isnt my opinion, it just happens to be written down in black and white. You guys better make your mind up whether or not the justice system works or not. If you think it works, quit bitching when someone gets off. The circumstances of each and every case are complex and that is why we have informed magistrates and judges to keep society working, and with the exception of a few fringe cases, the judicial system works perfectly. All it takes is the media in this state (which we know to be biased) to amp up any issue they feel is necessary to sell some more copies, or get more ratings...

no probs with the other stuff Ben but the invasion laws came about not because of the kid that was killed (although that incident may have helped) but because of an 81 year old woman who had a home invasion and led a massive protest in front of parliament house with a petitions holding 1000's of signatures on it.....her name was Ivey and is no longer with us.

And the home invasion law applies to someone inside your house at an unreasonable hour where you are allowed to perceive a life threatening situation (unlike before where equal or lesser force was the go) and therefore put the guy out of his misery.....the home invasion laws do not cover your property in your yard or shed, equal or lesser force applies here and I don't care what wiki says.

Edit for the lazy ;

Under South Australian law, the general defence appears in a nissan s15(1) Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA) for defending a person's life, and s15A(1) for defending property, subject to a hybrid test, i.e. the defendant honestly believed the threat to be imminent and made an objectively reasonable and proportionate response to the circumstances as the accused subjectively perceived them.

And that, my friends, is why lawyers exist.

couldnt read it all, was a bit boring but i had to edit this

bbbbaaaaahhhhhaaaaaa

no probs with the other stuff Ben but the invasion laws came about not because of the kid that was killed (although that incident may have helped) but because of an 81 year old woman who had a home invasion and led a massive protest in front of parliament house with a petitions holding 1000's of signatures on it.....her name was Ivey and is no longer with us.

And the home invasion law applies to someone inside your house at an unreasonable hour where you are allowed to perceive a life threatening situation (unlike before where equal or lesser force was the go) and therefore put the guy out of his misery.....the home invasion laws do not cover your property in your yard or shed, equal or lesser force applies here and I don't care what wiki says.

Thats fine Pete. You'll notice the wiki refers to the guidelines of criminal law, which existed before Mike Rann was ever in government. It is a general guideline for all Magistrates. The home invasion law is a subset of these which seeks define a very narrow qualifying category (as you rightly pointed out), however that does not change the fact that such things are weighed up by a magistrate and they almost unerringly favor the defendant (when the defendant is the home owner, defender, ie not the assailant - defendant being a relative term from case to case)

-D

and you know why Ben? (re the last part of your paragraph) cause our prisons are full and they don't get rehabilitated in there anyway, so judges do everything in their power to keep the crooks out......ship em to Christmas Island I reckon :D

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...