Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Did dyno run a few weeks ago and now wondering what it means and how much more can be gained. Setup is fairly stock, 3" turbo back, 12psi, superspark coils.

My limited knowledge of AFR's tells me this gets fairly rich, and by getting the WOT AFR closer to 12.5-13.2 I could squeeze more power from it? Can anyone estimate how much? And what would be the best method, haltech, safc, pfc (nothing wrong with future proofing :(

Only have the boost/afr part pic of the sheet with me at work, if the whole sheet is required then I'll upload once home. Also, what causes the 10. flat spot at the end of the run, injectors maxed/ecu?

post-63773-1257477377_thumb.jpg

Thanks!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/295126-yet-another-dyno-sheet-thread/
Share on other sites

I wouldn't really go leaner than 12:1 personally, the high 12/low 13 AFRs are ratios suited to NA cars... turbo cars like a fatter mixture but yes, the air fuel ratios you have are terrible. I'd consider checking to make sure you don't have an air leak somewhere.

here in nz we get 220-240kw on 12psi out of stock rb25det with front mount and 3" exhuast and a link ecu on dynapack hub dynos

standard injectors are maxed about 230kw although we have got 237kw on stock injectors.

safe and ideal af ratio for turbo car is between 11.6 and 12. 11.8 is the aim

getting an ecu that runs with out an afm is always good. depends on what your tuners in your area are familar with.

220-240rwkw out of a stock turbo is stupidly innacurate. your dyno is just plain wrong if its spitting out figures like that with a stock turbo, especially with a stock ecu

as said 12:1 is ideal under full load for a turbo car

220-240rwkw out of a stock turbo is stupidly innacurate. your dyno is just plain wrong if its spitting out figures like that with a stock turbo, especially with a stock ecu

as said 12:1 is ideal under full load for a turbo car

+1

From all what I have read, 200rwkw is about the max you can make with just 'basic mods' for the RB25DET. Moving beyond 200rwkw most likely need a aftermarket turbo or high flowed stock one & run more boost & also require the supporting mods.

For reference, my auto 33 made ~180rwkw with basic mods (3" turbo back exhuast, R34GTT SMIC, bleed valve +10psi setting & SAFC II)

220-240rwkw out of a stock turbo is stupidly innacurate. your dyno is just plain wrong if its spitting out figures like that with a stock turbo, especially with a stock ecu

as said 12:1 is ideal under full load for a turbo car

A hub dyno will always read higher KW figures over a roller dyno.

Their figures are quite accurate for the dynos they're being measured on. You can't compare, and this is why dynos are BULLSHIT.

if you read my post i had said Link ecu(i think its called vipec over there)

dynapack hub dynos are the most repeatable dynos out there, hence why nascars etc are tuned on them, as there is no crap like tyre slip etc

only thing they lack is a shootout mode for comparing against other dynos.

ie if you do 2 runs in a row. with out changing anything the runs will be within .2% of each other.

most people don't push stock turbos above 220kw.

here is the 2 that im talking about on this page. the first one is r34 neo rb25det(VVT isnt working), the 2nd is r33 rb25det. both with links, front mount and exhuast

http://www.skylinesdownunder.com/forums/sh...8244&page=2

my r33 with stock turbo, front mount, 3" exhuast made 220kw on 10psi on a basic road tune with a LINK ecu.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Greg speaks wisdom. These dirty old Datsuns are only value when they are cheap. When they are not cheap, there is no value. Sounds contradictory, but it's true. We are now 20 years past the hey day of modifying cheap 90s JDM cars for small amounts of money. This is a different world. If you are rich and can afford not to care about what is effectively wasting money on an old Datto shitter, then I have no reason to argue against it. But if you are wanting to experience what we all experienced back in 2005 (and I bought my car last century!) then there is no way to do it.
    • Short answer: No. Medium answer: No, because you still need to conjure the things out of thin air to bolt them to a NA to make it a NA+T. Long Answer: No - The things you need to conjure - meaning a turbo, intercooling, manifolds, exhaust, intake/manifold/piping, clutch, injectors, fuel pump, AFM (?), ECU + Wiring (woo, N/A loom fun) have to come from somewhere. You could have many scavenged these things from an OEM car that someone had upgraded from and use some of these. This will be cost prohibitive now, especially so in the USA. You'd probably pay the same for newer, upgraded components that are better than old OEM stuff from 25-30 years ago. None of these big ticket items are re-usable for the N/A car. Why not buy new and upgrade while you're there? The only real consideration is turbo and fuel sizing and determining whether you want to stay within the bounds of the OEM engine or get into rebuild territory. These limits ARE lower with a N/A motor and especially N/A gearbox at the starting point. And if you're gonna upgrade those then you may as well consider having them built to begin with. Because everyone here knows you're never far from that next engine rebuild once you start making the power you want... The cars you see on the internet and SAU etc have been built over decades. If you're really clued in... you would sell your US car to somebody for what you paid for it. You would then scour AU JDM pages or SAU and buy a car like Dose's on this forum with your powerful American Dollar. This will save you so much money in the long term. Importing it could be tricky. Or it might not because USA. I have long said the only reason 90's Japanese stuff took off was because a) Japanese people had Japanese cars so that is what they used b) Australians could import these cars to Australia with very minimal changes and use them on the road here c) Neither country had well-priced access to US or EU Sports Cars. I don't believe the JDM scene would have taken off in Australia at all if we had EU priced EU BMW M offerings, or more especially the AUS V8 Scene would never have existed if we had the multitude of US cars like Camaros, Mustangs, Corvettes at the prices you folks do. After all - Do the math. I would say put a V8 in your R34 and that's the smart way forward. It is. I did it. I know this from my own experience. But at that point there's no reason to simply not buy a C5 or C6? It would be simpler and easier and cheaper and bette-
    • Reading all this... hurts lol. I have an ENR34 5MT and I paid an inflated USA price for the car alone, had to do tons of preventative maintenance past that, and so I'm over $30K USD into the car already and haven't even touched power.  I wanted to +t it. Not even trying to make GTR numbers, I'd be happy with 250hp.  Can I get away with paying much less to make that happen?
    • Damn you’ve done well, definitely snapping necks.
    • Great weekend and event. Open fire at the caravan park, perfect weather all day and a great feed and a couple of drinks at at awesome country pub.
×
×
  • Create New...