Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

D:Documents and SettingsAdministratorMy DocumentsMy PicturesStagea Folder

D:Documents and SettingsAdministratorMy DocumentsMy PicturesStagea Folder

So it'd be a NISMO RS260 innit, since Autech n Nismo are rival companies?

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

So it'd be a NISMO RS260 innit, since Autech n Nismo are rival companies?

meh, **** off! lol

well its nismo, and it has an rb26 (im guessing)

hell, my colt is nismo to! and so is the datsun nismo forklift at work

shut up already!

there maybe a bit of nissan in your colt but there's nothing motorsport related in it... unless you managed to fit Richard Lyons in the driver seat...

So it'd be a NISMO RS260 innit, since Autech n Nismo are rival companies?

What he said...^^^^^^

I wouldn't say Nismo and Autech were "rival" companies though, just two companies modifying some of the same vehicles to be aimed at different market segments...

true, nismo creates motorsport inspired vehicles that look the part wheras I've noticed autech make motorsport inspired vehicles in family car disguises... they're like the ultimate sleeper factory.

Is it true that most of these are automatic?

T.

Yes, it's true... only the 260RS, the 2.5 25t RS FOUR S, and the Type B come in MT... all the rest are AT.

It's all good though, because the 260RS and the 25t RS FOUR S are the only ones worth getting anyway.

As I mentioned before, I have ordered a black Autech 260RS Stagea. These have the same mechanicals as a R33 GTR VSPEC, but I have been told they are over 310BHP as Autech have tweeked them over a standard GTR. Having seen a Stagea up close they are nothing special to look at, 1993 Volvo wagon would be the closest thing I could compare it with. BUT they are very quick and a true sleeper. I wanted a 4 door GTR but due to the changes in the import rules, they most likely will not be imported, so the next choice was the 260RS.

I will also setup a website dedicated to the 260RS to give Engrish people true info on these awsome cars.

P.S the 260RS is only available in manual.

Mal

haha didn't say I was buying it....just test driving it! I didn't expect to be able to drive one before I bought it.

Re Autos, out of the 150 odd that went to auction in the last 3 days there were 5 manuals (including 1 260rs)

If you've driven a Skyline, you'd driven a Stagea.

Of course a 260 would be pretty much like a GT-R.

But look at it this way...

A standard Stagea has the Skyline floorplan and similar suspension.

But it weights 150kg more.

It has the same brakes off the N/A model.

Distribution is a bit off.

Obviously you will need 33/34 GTSt/GTt parts to be able to bring it up to the same spec as the turbo coupe.

T.

Yes i know 280s a pretty extreme speed is an extrame speed and right now i dont have time to look for a pic to prove it to you.. But i can tell from what i know ... example...

I malaysia most of the crazy driver like me drive 200 km/h almost every week on freeway ( I drive it almost everyday for 10 minute) can't be fu*K of driving 110 for 20 minute.. if i get a fine only cost me max of $150. Hope this give some picture.. so therefore the cop on the freeway petrol have to drive a power full car to chase us if we have reach to 200KM/h passing by. So therefore Volvo T5 they use and every drive saw a T5 stop beside even if we are driving 220 or 230km.h... we will need to stop cause we know 270 or 280 the car can reach... if the car can't 280 do you think i will stop and wait for them to fine me??? forget it ..... that is in malaysia from my pass experience... but then is my pass.

I strongly doubt the T5 can reach 280k.

The 2.3 turbo five does something like 250hp and 330Nm. With the blunt dynamics it'll take much more pressure to hit 280.

I don't think a stock 32/33/34 GT-R will reach 280 and these are bullets compared to the T5.

T.

  • 6 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...