Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi,

just after some info on the gtr r33 abs system and if i should still run it?

looking at upgrading to some quite larger brakes also having the the rears on a hydralic hand brake setup.

so should i run with the abs or do away with it and if i keep how will i go setting up a hydralic hand brake system?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/296741-r33-gtr-abs-or-no-abs-race-car/
Share on other sites

Please take this the right way Travis, but it depends on how good a driver you are. If you know how to modulate the brake pedal, have a feel for imminent lock up, take the time to learn the skill of maximising the braking effort, then there is no doubt no ABS is the way to go. Plus save 20 kgs or so at the same time. A good circuit race driver will always be better than the factory ABS. But if you are not so skilled then stick with the ABS, it will save your ass and $some in not flat spotting tyres.

What's the hydraulic hand brake for? GTR's are already too heavy, why add even more weight?

Cheers

Gary

car is used for hillclimbs and found at 1 event it has a hair pin at top and im losing alot of time without a decent hand brake as the std one wont lock up slicks.

yes i was thinking about weight loss also by deleting the abs setup. i dont have much doubt in my driving ability and shall be extending it to the track very soon and into tarmac rallys, hense the brake upgrade as the std brembos are just ok for hillclimbs but wont hold up on the track.

i would like to keep abs but the hydralic hand brake is a must, also was thinking with the bigger brake upgrade will deleting the abs have side affects to the brake bias? and have any negative affects?

here is a clip of the top runner 1st place around the hair pin

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2TxsoyXomLQ

this is me

im a second slower, and that second can be made up easly with car setup

how can i stop my wheels lifting also in tight corners?

post-51272-1258515971_thumb.jpg

post-51272-1258516038_thumb.jpg

have you tried just upgrading the handbrake shoes? Made a big difference on my car

I'm not a huge fan of the ABS system, I never had ABS on the GTSt and just learnt to live without it... the GTR ABS cuts in fairly late and if it does you have already overcooked the corner so no point to it I reckon... is your car Vspec? I think they have different ABS to standard? mine is regular GTR and the ABS is fairly crude, not anywhere near as sophisticated as modern systems

mine tripods too, not sure how to get rid of that though... more travel in rear suspension, softer rears... dunno, SK should be able to shed light

Its a relatively cheap mod you may as well try it first, before you go hydraulic... I've got the Project Mu ones... they seem to do the job for the guys running semis at Deca... some of the courses require a few handbrake turns and they don't seem to fade... not an issue for you as you'll only be using it once in the run by the looks of it...

nice video too, looks like a fun hill climb:)

Let me start off with some track observations, that is one painful artificial hairpin. It’s not normal to find such a drastic U turn in a normal hillclimb. Hairpins yes, but carpark U turns no. The set up for that track would be quite different to most of the hillclimb tracks around. I can only assume it’s there to slow the cars for the right hander which would have a very high speed entry if not for the U turn.

Back to the question at hand, it’s amazing how a little more information makes the question so much easier to answer;

I'd lose the ABS and at the same time save the weight over the front which is always the weakest link in setting up a GTR. Anytime you can save weight in the front do it. Anytime you can transfer weight from the front to the back, do it.

When you remove the ABS you will have to reroute the hydraulic brake lines. So that’s a good time to change the split from diagonal to front and rear and then you can add a simple rear brake bias adjuster. I generally use the Tilton, lever style.

For hillclimbs I use quite different brake pad compounds front and rear, than I do for circuit racing. I would use something like a Hawk HT10 in the front and a HTC70 in the rear. That will give you faster initial bight in the rear, added to the ability to adjust the bias and you should be able to control the rear on corner entry.

The major problem I see is geometry set up, for the lower speed hillclimbs (with tight corners) I use a lot of toe out on the rear of GTRs. It makes them nice and nervous under brakes. I have used up to 3 mm each side.

It’s hard to tell from the video but it looks like you might not have enough caster, that’s maybe also be why it’s lazy on turn in. The reality is you can’t have too much caster on GTRs, they could always do with more than is physically possible. I don’t know how much you have now but I’d try and get some more.

For hillclimbs I run very little rear camber, around 1 degree negative is usually enough. It helps get off the line and it means the camber curve goes positive under brakes. This also helps on the turn in.

I don’t know what shocks and springs you are running but they don’t appear to have sufficient droop for hillclimbing. Plus the front spring and/or bump damper rates are possibly too high or maybe the front anti roll is too high.

Hopefully that is of some help. If you want to go deeper into it, I will need the current alignment settings, including ride heights (centre of wheel to guard of course) plus spring rates and swaybar rates.

Cheers

Gary

yes i was thinking about weight loss also by deleting the abs setup. i dont have much doubt in my driving ability and shall be extending it to the track very soon and into tarmac rallys, hense the brake upgrade as the std brembos are just ok for hillclimbs but wont hold up on the track.

If you are going to be driving the car in hill climbs and tarmac rallies then my 2c is you are mad to delete the ABS, no matter how good a driver you think you are. On changeable roads, where there is moss, dirt, loose gravel etc on certain corners etc then i think the ABS will make you more consistant and quicker overall.

On a pure circuit car i can see the sense in deleting the ABS, but not a tarmac rally car.

+1 for handbrake shoes, grab some drift ones. I know plenty of people using them for motorkhana work, two people actually went away from the hydraulic setups they had in their cars and went to URAS shoes

I'm 100% with Roy. pound for pound there is nothing as valuable in tarmac rally than ABS. In fact I'd rather remove the turbo first to save weight.

You just *cannot* get every stop perfect in unknown conditions or unknown tarmac in unknown weather conditions with changing car weight, tyre grip, surface and even driver attention on a long day. Even if you are a champion and only need in 1 time in 100 it will still be worth the trouble.

save potato farmer's fences. vote 1 ABS.

abs is staying in i guess.

and i went with the whiteline suspention aligment setup they have on there site.

Race Pack

Settings only acheivable with Whiteline alignment kits

front Camber -2.25 to -4

front Caster - max

front Toe - -0.5

rear Camber -2 -1.5 to -2.5

rear Caster - n/a

rear Toe - 0.5

abs is staying in i guess.

and i went with the whiteline suspention aligment setup they have on there site.

Race Pack

Settings only acheivable with Whiteline alignment kits

front Camber -2.25 to -4

front Caster - max

front Toe - -0.5

rear Camber -2 -1.5 to -2.5

rear Caster - n/a

rear Toe - 0.5

Since I wrote those specs for Whiteline I can hardly argue with them :P

But it is worth keeping in mind that they are only a point at which to start from. I would run very different settings for hillclimbs and circuit races, let alone tarmac rallies. On that subject I agree with the guys, for tarmac rallies stick with the ABS, but for hillclimbs and circuit racing I would run no ABS. It's all part of the compromises when you run such different events.

Cheers

Gary

Since I wrote those specs for Whiteline I can hardly argue with them :P

But it is worth keeping in mind that they are only a point at which to start from. I would run very different settings for hillclimbs and circuit races, let alone tarmac rallies. On that subject I agree with the guys, for tarmac rallies stick with the ABS, but for hillclimbs and circuit racing I would run no ABS. It's all part of the compromises when you run such different events.

Cheers

Gary

sounds good then but i had those specs with std caster rods, guess i have to get some then

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For fuelling the Haltechs have O2WB fuel controllers. Very useful for helping tuning VE and correcting for *small* mistakes. Of course if your injector/cam/trigger/sensor data is just wrong (or for a GTT which is not a GT) then you will get impossible reactions to things. I am sure you know this already but the reason people don't typically put haltechs (or any Aftermarket ECU) on GT's is because there's practically no real gains to be had - So this knowledge won't be commonplace.
    • Can someone tell me if the cracks seen in the rear sway bar bushings in these photo's is unacceptable from a roadworthy point of view?  
    • Shouldn't need a "base map" for anything other than guidance to ignition tuning. You just need the engine capacity right, the injector size right, and something, almost anything, for a VE map. On an NA engine, fuelling is almost completely a function of load signal & rpm. It should run and drive with a completely flat fuel map. It will be too lean under load, but that's easily fixed. We used to tune all ECUs without any base map. There were no such things (until someone had tuned a near stock engine on one, and then they had a "base map".
    • What did you actually buy/how much did it cost? When I got mine in like.. 2017...? 2019? the aim was to run Torque for gauges via ODB2 and things like Track Addict/Laptimers/Dashcam/Reversecam/Spotify etc. Mine never broke, but I wonder if you've got the same needs (it sounds like it). Cause I liked the idea of being able to do anything with it. That said, yours also cost 3x the cost of what I spent so... food for thought.  
    • For me there is a massive difference in manufacturer or big brand crippled android (Sony, Kenwood etc) vs the sort of thing I've installed here, which is basically just a tablet in DIN form factor with open Android, and the other model of course is mirroring - Android Auto/Carplay. I hate the locked down manufacturer and AA options where they decide what apps I'm allowed to install, including the Launcher but also importantly things like Ecutek (for this car) or Real Dash (Stagea) are not supported. Plus those crippled versions tend to be slower due to both overheads and lower spec hardware. On the other hand, when this breaks I'll likely be in trouble for support....but how is that different to owning an Infiniti anyway
×
×
  • Create New...