Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I've been experimenting with my new f/2.8 100mm Macro lens, a makeshift and very simple "studio" and tethered shooting over the past few days, here's what I've come up with. Not all shots are with the Macro lens, though. I think I'll need another Macro with a shorter focal length for some of these style shots in the future.

IMG_0002_4v2.jpg

IMG_0004_2v2.jpg

IMG_0009_2v2.jpg

IMG_0003_1v2.jpg

And a few of my limited edition DJ Shadow and Cut Chemist "The Hard Sell Tour Juke-Bot..."

IMG_5566v2.jpg

IMG_5575v2.jpg

damn jelous of the shed!

heres a pic i took before trying out a flash setup. holding camera in my hand lol so not the best of end results. can see the flash in my glasses too, but i think it tuned out alright for a $10 flash bracket setup!!

IMG_5509_DxO_raw.jpg

Looks like december has been a little quite..

Some amazing pics in here.. I like those drift pics..

heres a pic i took before trying out a flash setup. holding camera in my hand lol so not the best of end results. can see the flash in my glasses too, but i think it tuned out alright for a $10 flash bracket setup!!

man i like it actually..

Few baby photos i took at a friends wedding: Photos taken with only 1 lens: 70-200.. Thats all i own!!

Pics from wedding here: http://www.sidd-rishi.com/gallery/nish/

IMG_5359_resize.jpg

IMG_5355_resize.jpg

IMG_5430_resize.jpg

Edited by siddr20
Heres a couple from me, any cc would be appreciated..

toy31.jpg

some nice pics guys!

did you specifically try and make that 1st one look like a tilt shift?

That's exactly what I was thinking!

That's exactly what I was thinking!

yeah guys i did, i found a really good cs4 tutorial website so have been playing around with my photos lately, i like that one that you guys quoted, gives the car a kind of model car feel i reckon..

thanks for your comments guys..

heres another one.. :(

Picture111.jpg

Edited by iadore4door34s

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...