Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

How is the steering rack ("weight, effort, pressure", call it what you will...), solenoid triggered? Is it either open or closed, thus light or heavy, or does the ecu duty cycle it to give a linear steering effort change? Thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/298883-power-steering-rack-solenoid/
Share on other sites

What type of car?

Most car the sensor on the rack is only a sensor for the ecu so it knows to bump the idle up so as the motor dosnt stall from the load of the power steering pump

Interested in both R33 GTS-t and R33 GTR

The idle up is via a pressure switch in the pump high pressure line. The rack itself has a bypass bleed solenoid to vary rack assistance effort.

Interested in both R33 GTS-t and R33 GTR

The idle up is via a pressure switch in the pump high pressure line. The rack itself has a bypass bleed solenoid to vary rack assistance effort.

Ah yeah I know what you are talking about now.

It should be liniar. the ecu (or might be another modul) ajusted the efford compared to the speed the car is doing. E.g. more asisted at low speeds in car parks and less assisted at hight speed on the highway

I am pretty sure the hi-cas ecu in the boot controlls the unit, I am also interested in how it is operated.

My 33 gtst sometimes goes heavy and stays heavy. then next time i start it, it could be normal again.

Im looking at modding it.. possably removing it, would love to know how it is operated!

i am having a problems with my steering aswell feels like its controlled electronically when driving and makes the car viere from left to right slightly, so i could be driving down a straight bit of road and the car will just turn itself to one side slightly and start heading that way then turn back all of a sudden, its freaking annoying.

do u think replacing the hicas ecu will fix this problem?

as the hicas was also playing up, and was wiggling the arse end intermittently, so i removed it. maybe they are all related, and the hicas ecu is responsible.

found the info I was looking for.. in this thread.. http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Po...amp;hl=steering

look for the waveforms on post #29..

I haven't gotten any further into replacing the hicas module as mine is working.. after I fixed everything else.

  • 3 years later...

Major thread revival.

So i'm trying to find out what signal the Hicas unit gives the power steering solenoid in an R33 rack.

As the rack isn't actually in an R33 i can't just hook up a scope to the plug and see what its doing.

I need to know the duty cycle and frequency of the output is at say 0km/h and 100km/h. I assume it will be a linear line between those two points, above someone said its a square wave, thats a start.

The above link from heller44 does not work.

I looked in the R33 workshop manual which was no real help. It just stated that you should see approx 6-8V at 0km/h and around 2V? at 100km/h.

No actual duty cycle or frequency data is given in the manual.

What i'm trying to hopefully do is control the solenoid from my Link ECU in my R31. I previously have driven the car with the solenoid completely off and it did feel heavy at a stand still and low speeds.

Any help would be appreciated.

  • Like 1

Sweet, cheers for that mate.

That should be pretty easy to work out the duty cycle from then.

Locked at 123Hz across the board.

At 0km/h if the Solenoid is meant to be getting Approx 4.4 - 6.6V that is a rough 32 - 47% Duty cycle

At 100km/h if the Solenoid is meant to be getting Approx 1.5 - 2.2V that is a rough 11 - 16% Duty cycle.

Calculated on the basis of 14V.

After 100km/h do you know if the duty drops off to 0 eventually or it stays at approx 16% after 100km/h?

Looks like its just a case of doing a linear graph every 10km/h from 0 to 100 using those duty cycle's as the start and finish points.

  • Like 1
  • 6 years later...
On 3/19/2013 at 3:07 AM, kitto said:

Sweet, cheers for that mate.

That should be pretty easy to work out the duty cycle from then.

Locked at 123Hz across the board.

At 0km/h if the Solenoid is meant to be getting Approx 4.4 - 6.6V that is a rough 32 - 47% Duty cycle

At 100km/h if the Solenoid is meant to be getting Approx 1.5 - 2.2V that is a rough 11 - 16% Duty cycle.

Calculated on the basis of 14V.

After 100km/h do you know if the duty drops off to 0 eventually or it stays at approx 16% after 100km/h?

Looks like its just a case of doing a linear graph every 10km/h from 0 to 100 using those duty cycle's as the start and finish points.

Sorry to revive an old thread mate, wanted to know if there is a way to achieve this with some kind of dc converter? I got one of these racks with the solenoid in it but my r33 didn't have the solenoid type rack or wiring for it to begin with.

Edited by nicostar

What do you mean "DC converter"?

If you just want a fixed voltage at the rack, you could just blow away the extra volts with a suitably sized (ohms and watts) resistor.

If you wanted to go to the effort of using more electronics to achieve the same goal and waste a little less electricity, you could certainly put a DC-DC converter on there.

Or, you could build an Arduino to run a PWM output to an SSR. Choose a suitable frequency for the PWM (maybe 100Hz) and just punch out the pulsewidths required to get the voltage you want. It's pretty clear that it wants somewhere around 6V to get max assist (at low speeds) and ~2V to get minimum assist at higher speeds. If you went to a little more effort you could connect an Arduino input to the VSS and give it full variable assist to the same extent that the HICAS CU would.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Here is the mess that I made. That filler there was successful in filling dents in that area. But in the middle area. I can feel dents. And I've gone ocer it multiple times with filler. And the filler is no longer there because i accidently sanded it away. I've chased my tail on this job but this is something else lol. So I'm gonna attempt filler one more time and if it doesn't work I'll just high fill primer the door and see where the issues are because guidecoat is of no use atm.
    • Ok, so I think I sort of figured out where I went wrong. So I definitely overthinked it, and I over sanded, which is probably a large part of the problem. to fix it, I ended up tapping some spots that were likely to be high, made them low, filled them in, and I tackled small sections at a time, and it feels a lot better.    I think what confused me as well is you have the bare metal, and some spots darker and some are lighter, and when I run my finger across it, it' would feel like it's a low spot, but I think it's just a transition in different texture from metal to body filler.    When your finger's sliding on the body filler, and crosses over to the bare metal, going back and forth, it feels like it's a low spot. So I kept putting filler there and sanding, but I think it was just a transition in texture, nothing to do with the low or high spot. But the panel's feels a lot better, and I'm just going to end up priming it, and then I'll block it after with guide coat.   Ended up wasting just about all of my filler on this damn door lol  
    • -10 is plenty for running to an oil cooler. When you look at oil feeds, like power steering feeds, they're much smaller, and then just a larger hose size to move volume in less pressure. No need for -12. Even on the race cars, like Duncans, and endurance cars, most of them are all running -10 and everything works perfectly fine, temps are under control, and there's no restrictions.
    • Update: O2 sensor in my downpipe turned out to be faulty when I plugged in to the Haltech software. Was getting a "open circuit" warning. Tons of carbon buildup on it, probably from when I was running rich for a while before getting it corrected. Replaced with new unit and test drove again. The shuffle still happens, albeit far less now. I am not able to replicate it as reliably and it no longer happens at the same RPM levels as before. The only time I was able to hear it was in 5th going uphill and another time in 5th where there was no noticeable incline but applying more throttle first sped it up and then cleared it. Then once in 4th when I slightly lifted the throttle going over a bump but cleared right after. My understanding is that with the O2 sensor out, the ECU relies entirely on the MAP tune and isn't able to make its small adjustments based on the sensors reading. All in all, a big improvement, though not the silver bullet. Will try validating the actuators are set up correctly, and potentially setting up shop time to tune the boost controller on closed loop rather than the open loop it is set to now. Think if it's set up on closed loop to take the O2 reading, that should deal with these last bits. Will try to update again as I go. 
    • More so GReddy oil relocation kits, sandwich plates, etc. all use 10AN fittings. And same, I've only used 10AN and my car sees track work (circuit, doing laps, not 10 sec squirt business).
×
×
  • Create New...