Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

the track does look great! theres grass and everything

shits on bahrain

Track-wise they could have made the in-field a little more interesting though.. Also, anyone else pick out that the kink/sweeper thingy at turn 2/3/4 looks a lot like the last section of the Yeongam circuit??? I think Hermann is definitely running out of ideas!

  • Replies 3.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

they need to find a small mountain and build a circuit all over the hills and valleys

the whole reason this U.S circuit looks so promising is coz it's a new track that finally isn't flatter than a freshly milled cylinder head

Theyve thrown old Darryl beattie in the deep end, he is struggling hosting the show lol.

Tell you what I miss neil cromptons input, its gone downhill since he left, although craid baird isnt too bad, better then mcconville :)

Well...iys been nice :) Unless Alonso gets it on with Vettel :yes:

Webber has sucked in the second sector all weekend....there straights for gods sakes? Something isnt right. Webz is meant to have the freshest engine...but he and the car have no pace

Alonso can walk it from here :cool:

Yeah, Webs doesn't deserve WDC on that sort of performance, I'm afraid. Even BUTTON was faster... And you can't blame the car, Vettel put it on pole.

I'm afraid Webs choked. It's Alonso's to lose now. :)

Edited by acediac
Theyve thrown old Darryl beattie in the deep end, he is struggling hosting the show lol.

Tell you what I miss neil cromptons input, its gone downhill since he left, although craid baird isnt too bad, better then mcconville :)

Cromps and Baird would make a good combo, just anything other than Rusty.. Heck, I'd rather Daryl Eastlake!!

I dont think of Mark as a choker though...i would back him to throw it into the wall before choking and being slow. I look forward to reading a bit more from around the traps. I know on Friday all Marks running was testing new wings....so you woudl think thats a good thing. Love to know if he is running them or whether they went back to old spec bits

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
×
×
  • Create New...