Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Whenever I fill up my r33 with a full tank of fuel the car feels like it has way more power / response. Whenever the fuel starts to get below half a tank the car gets 'doughier' and keeps getting worse the lower the fuel reading is. Last night I still had a quarter of a tank and was driving like a slug, when I filled up, BANG, response is back and car feels like it has an extra couple of kw atw lol.

For the record, I have a 400hp fuel pump and am only running 170kw atw, and this problem has been happening even on the stock fuel pump before the mods.

Can anyone explain this?

Cheers,

Adz.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/302176-less-petrol-less-power-response/
Share on other sites

You would need to prove it on a dyno and log the AFR's. What you are describing could be symptomatic of a fuel pressure problem. This could indicate issues with the fuel pump, or an issue with the charcoal canister. Is your charcoal canister still connected?

I have no idea mate, I'm not a very mechanically minded person. I had it dynod a few weeks back when I had some work done and apparently the AFRs were all good, it's just something that I notice ,being that I drive the car on a daily basis. I imagine the charcoal canister is still connected as I got the car 100% stock and have only changed the basics.

Thank you for your reply, it is much appreciated.

yeah the amount of fuel in the tank and how much you put in wont have an effect

even running empty has no effect, as the pump sucks from the bottom all the time anyhoo

your likely causes as ash said, given you dont have the stock pump

is poor pump install - its probably floating around, and when go lower than half full, it lays on it side or something silly

check the basics

look inside the fuel tank and find the pump

it should be slotted into the hook / latch thing on the roof of the tank, so that it goes all the way to bottom and doesnt slide / move around

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...