Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

8500 that would just be awesome, goodbye ceramic wheels thou lol

At 7900 it still does sound smooth =)

:)

Motor RPM is not really relevant to the life of the ceramic wheel.

What kills the ceramic wheel is a combination of heat & RPM, these are directly related to the tune and boost pressure used.

Not a hell of a lot to do with RPM unfortunately, nice try though.

so will the rb25 head macthed with a bigger turbo able to flow good enough to still make power around 7400-7900??? i have heard good things about the rb20 making its way up to 8 or so but the 25???

The RB25 is not a RB20 - They are not the same motor so what one will happily do, has little to no bearing on what another will do.

For long term life of your motor, you apply sane RPM to the motor with stock rod bolts.

Sane RPM being 7000rpm.

IF you do not care how long your motor lasts, then spin it to 8500rpm for a while and enjoy the rebuild process.

Just pray that the rod(s) doesn't go outside the block... it does get a bit messy when that happens.

My GT-RS R33 is still limited to factory limiter. 6900-7000, around there. Power is still climbing at these revs, but its not worth the stress a few hundred RPM place on the engine.

I would love to raise it abit and squeeze a tiny bit more MPH in each gear, but I think the life of the standard rods are more important.

Edited by Granthem

I have my rev-limiter set at 7300rpm and pull 3 degrees of timing after 6800rpm so the car is sluggish, this way I never hit the rev limiter, except in 1st gear. What breaks things is actually rev bashing, which I still do LOL

Most aftermarket ECU's have a soft cut limiter and than a hard cut limiter to soften the blow a bit.

I have mine set to 7000 for soft and then 7300 for hard cut i think. I normally shift at 7000 or just before.

Used to have it set to 8000 after the head got built to give it a go, but didn't see the point due to the turbo not making more power that high up in my application.

Edited by PM-R33

My rev limiter is set to 7100 rpm with the power fc, and it feels like the engine is screaming for more revs with a gt 3582, etm manifold, plazmaman plenum etc. Even the tuner asked if he could set the limiter higher because the turbo still kicks in hard. I'm just afraid that the standard internals wont last, and when will the hydraulic lifters stop working so the rev limit is really an issue for me too. How would the engine last with rev limit set to 7500? Or should you change a better balancer first?

Your GTRS makes power past 7000rpm? Mine doesn't :(

You got a dyno graph?

EDIT: Don't worry just found your dyno graph :)

Yeh i just checked, i guess its fairly slowing down by 7000 isnt it haha.

Hadnt looked at it for a while

relative stress on a motor is roughly equal to power*rpm^2. so if you double the power you double the stress, but double the rpm and you quadruple the stress. hence why revving to 8k for the sake of it is stupid. 8000 puts 1.3 times more stress on the motor than 7000 at the same power level, thats the same as going from 300rwkw to 390rwkw at the same rpm. still sound good on stock internals?

Every comment in this post has something wrong with it... I would trust a monkey with a bomb before this guy.

8500 that would just be awesome, goodbye ceramic wheels thou lol

At 7900 it still does sound smooth =)

I dont get the Einstein licking a window lol

Oh and their is nothing wrong with Walbro.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well you could certainly buy or build an enclosure for a pod in that corner of the bay. It is absolutely vital that there is a nice big opening to let cold air in to it from the front or underside, otherwise it will just pull air in around the edges from the bay, and if that air is hot, you gain nothing from enclosing the pod. There is lots of good evidence around (including on here, see posts by @Kinkstaah for example) showing that pods pulling hot air from the bay is only a problem when you're static or slow in traffic, and that as soon as you get the car up and moving the air being grabbed by the pod cools down. Although that will obviously vary from car to car, whether there is a flow of cold air to the pod or if it all has to come through the radiator area, etc etc. Obviously, the whole exercise requires as much thought as anything else does. Doing the lazy thing will often end up being the dumb thing. The stock GTT airbox has a cold air snorkel to feed it from over the radiator. Shows that Nissan were thinking. The GT airbox is upside down compared to the turbo one, yeah? Inlet at the bottom, AFM/exit on the lid? That might make it harder to route the turbo inlet pipe using the GT airbox than a turbo one. That would probably be the main reason I'd consider not using it, not that it is too small and restrictive. I'm looking at a photo of one now and the inlet opening seems nice and large. Also seems to have the same type of snorkel that the turbo one has. Maybe all that's required is to make a less restrictive snorkel/cold air inlet, perhaps by punching down through the guard like I did.
    • Also seen this as an option 
    • I get you, we’ll see I’m aiming for 200ish kw now and hopefully 300rwkw down the line after some upgrades maybe like headstuds, E85 flex fuel etc  so trying to make it final for that now, I can get a GTT airbox for $280 so it’s not too bad but not sure if there’s better ways to spend that money. I seen online they say pod filter which isn’t enclosed isn’t good especially for a plus T.      hard to say what to do
    • Meh. How much power can you make from a +T anyway? I wouldn't have though it would be enough to challenge the airbox. It's not as if it's tiny compared with the turbo one. As to putting a pod in a stock airbox .... it's not the filter element that would be restrictive. It would be the air inlet to the box that would be the narrow point, which you could open up regardless of what element was inside. On my R32 I opened up the sort of triangular opening in the bottom front corner of the box, deformed (heated, moulded) some 4" stormwater pipe to fit to that opening and punched a 4" hole down through the inner guard to the spot where the stock intercooler used to be. This was purely in the search for a cold intake, but you could do something similar if you need to open up the inlet side of it. The AFM tube size is the same for both NA and turbo, so the outlet from the airbox is same same anyway. If you're going to do the right thing, then an aftermarket ECU won't care about the AFM (ie, you can get rid of it). But even if it was still there, people pull >300rwkW through them all day, and I suspect you won't be going there.
    • R34 RB25de Neo by the way ^ 
×
×
  • Create New...