Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all, first of all I did search for this, but I got mixed results.

How much power does the N/A RB25 make stock standard in a r33 or r34?

From what I understand, I've heard things from 90kW all the way to 150kW... I'm guessing its around 120kW?

Cheers, Jimbo

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/304077-rb25de-power/
Share on other sites

Are you sure you searched properly? lol this question is everywere.

r33 - 140kw@fly

VCT - 147kw@fly (series 2 NA) or type s variants

r34 - 147kw@fly

I think even some rare r32s came with a NA rb25 which was about 130kw@fly?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/304077-rb25de-power/#findComment-5037059
Share on other sites

My RB25DE in my R32 dyno'd @ 115rwkw. Your mum's magna/verada or whatever is heavier, handles like crap, looks like crap and is FWD. I wouldn't even compare the two.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/304077-rb25de-power/#findComment-5037195
Share on other sites

My RB25DE in my R32 dyno'd @ 115rwkw. Your mum's magna/verada or whatever is heavier, handles like crap, looks like crap and is FWD. I wouldn't even compare the two.

Yes I agree with you; it looks like crap and FWD is a downside. But, it doesn't handle like crap... http://www.autoweb.com.au/cms/A_1781/title...TV/article.html

I would have thought that 163kW was pretty good for an N/A, but no, I would never own one..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/304077-rb25de-power/#findComment-5037219
Share on other sites

My RB25DE in my R32 dyno'd @ 115rwkw. Your mum's magna/verada or whatever is heavier, handles like crap, looks like crap and is FWD. I wouldn't even compare the two.

i disagree after owning 2 v6 magna's. sure they might not handle quite as well, but they aren't that much heavier and have much more torque to make up for the extra weight. the on;y model that is sluggish is the 4 speed auto (5 speed auto is fine) and that is because it has ridiculously tall gearing. i'm talking 150kmh in second. seriously, people take these to the drags and can cross the line redlining second gear.

as for fwd being a bad thing, that is a highly uneducated response that gets thrown around way too often these days. basically it is said because you can't be some fuli hektic drifta wannabe in a fwd car, but who really cares?

Jimbo

There is a difference between power at the fly and power at the wheels, dont get confused.

yeah, as a very rough rule, flywheel kw = hp at the wheels (then divide by 1.34 to get kw at the wheels). but as i said, it's a rough rule and doesn't work for everything

A verada would be quicker then an N/A line anyway. Honestly if you're buying a car to "beat other cars" an N/A Skyline shouldn't be your choice.

+1. my manual 3.5L magna with just a catback ran a 14.8 at willowbank. also outright power doesn't mean you are going to beat something with similar power. so many other things come into play. i'd put money on my 88fwkw pulsar keeping up or beating half of the skylines on here that are making more power, for the simple fact that it weighs about 200kg less.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/304077-rb25de-power/#findComment-5037626
Share on other sites

i disagree after owning 2 v6 magna's. sure they might not handle quite as well, but they aren't that much heavier and have much more torque to make up for the extra weight. the on;y model that is sluggish is the 4 speed auto (5 speed auto is fine) and that is because it has ridiculously tall gearing. i'm talking 150kmh in second. seriously, people take these to the drags and can cross the line redlining second gear.

as for fwd being a bad thing, that is a highly uneducated response that gets thrown around way too often these days. basically it is said because you can't be some fuli hektic drifta wannabe in a fwd car, but who really cares?

yeah, as a very rough rule, flywheel kw = hp at the wheels (then divide by 1.34 to get kw at the wheels). but as i said, it's a rough rule and doesn't work for everything

+1. my manual 3.5L magna with just a catback ran a 14.8 at willowbank. also outright power doesn't mean you are going to beat something with similar power. so many other things come into play. i'd put money on my 88fwkw pulsar keeping up or beating half of the skylines on here that are making more power, for the simple fact that it weighs about 200kg less.

Would you agree that if you want a "fast street NA" you'd be better off dropping your unsprung mass and upgrading your tyres rather than chasing pitiful NA power mods?

P plater Falcodores pull up beside me all the time with 4 people in their car, monster subs rumbling in the boot AND 20" solid chromies and rev their engine at me. Do they assume that all Commodore/Falcons are automatic drag cars?

I'd love to see a little pulsar with a lightened flywheel, 6kg rims, all unneccesary weight removed and grippy tyres take off one day. I reckon it'd put quite a few cars to shame.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/304077-rb25de-power/#findComment-5037874
Share on other sites

Would you agree that if you want a "fast street NA" you'd be better off dropping your unsprung mass and upgrading your tyres rather than chasing pitiful NA power mods?

P plater Falcodores pull up beside me all the time with 4 people in their car, monster subs rumbling in the boot AND 20" solid chromies and rev their engine at me. Do they assume that all Commodore/Falcons are automatic drag cars?

I'd love to see a little pulsar with a lightened flywheel, 6kg rims, all unneccesary weight removed and grippy tyres take off one day. I reckon it'd put quite a few cars to shame.

Pulsars aren't all that spectacular, a mates pulsar has exhaust,extractors,cams,NIStune, light rims, l/w flywheel, hd clutch and my car and a mates commodore are still a lot quicker then his. I know for a fact that a 25DE R33 with catback and pod can edge out a stock VX V6. Peak HP and power/weight ratio aren't everything, gearing & torque are IMO more important and then the driver comes into play.....hell i know people with WRX's that wouldnt be able to beat an excel from how shit they drive.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/304077-rb25de-power/#findComment-5037894
Share on other sites

Would you agree that if you want a "fast street NA" you'd be better off dropping your unsprung mass and upgrading your tyres rather than chasing pitiful NA power mods?

P plater Falcodores pull up beside me all the time with 4 people in their car, monster subs rumbling in the boot AND 20" solid chromies and rev their engine at me. Do they assume that all Commodore/Falcons are automatic drag cars?

I'd love to see a little pulsar with a lightened flywheel, 6kg rims, all unneccesary weight removed and grippy tyres take off one day. I reckon it'd put quite a few cars to shame.

yes i would agree.

Pulsars aren't all that spectacular, a mates pulsar has exhaust,extractors,cams,NIStune, light rims, l/w flywheel, hd clutch and my car and a mates commodore are still a lot quicker then his. I know for a fact that a 25DE R33 with catback and pod can edge out a stock VX V6. Peak HP and power/weight ratio aren't everything, gearing & torque are IMO more important and then the driver comes into play.....hell i know people with WRX's that wouldnt be able to beat an excel from how shit they drive.

well then your mates pulsar is crap (more than likely the tune), unless of course it is either the 1.6L or an old 1.8L, because a sr20 with nistune, poncams, and full exhaust should be putting out around 110kw at the wheels (which has little to do with the cams as they only give about 4kw up top but give 7 or 8kw to the low and middle), and able to run mid 14's with slicks. there is even 1 or 2 into the 13's that are still natro and just have headwork ontop of the cams, exhaust and nistune. there are a few into the 14's with street tyres and plenty running very low 15's still on stock ecu and cams on street tyres.

and from my experience, with my pulsar putting out about 88kw at the wheels from just full exhaust and panel filter, it can adequately keep up with commodores or NA skylines. and if the skyline is an auto it will do more than keep up.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/304077-rb25de-power/#findComment-5039309
Share on other sites

All your comments are all true, but at the end of the day I will be on my P-Plates, and I don't want to lose my license. So until then, I'm sure 120kW's will be more than enough. There's something about Japanese cars that I love, and I just can't see myself driving a Magnafalcodore..!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/304077-rb25de-power/#findComment-5047749
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...